User talk:Geo.plrd
Current messages Contents
LinusThank you. I had missed the page of his parole. Leopeo 05:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT) P.S. Thank you also for deleting the page I had created by mistake! Leopeo 07:20, 16 May 2007 (EDT) NoticePlease read this: New Sysops Training Page Conservative 21:25, 17 May 2007 (EDT) You're not conservativeHow come you are on here, your political compass indicates that you are center to center-left. I didn't think other moderates were allowed on here. --UncleJalapeno 10:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
PleistoceneI see that you gave this a definition coming from "evolution". I would have put it down as a term from "geology". I don't want to edit it in case you think I pushing a POV. I would like to know what you think. BrianCo 12:23, 18 May 2007 (EDT) Sci-TolIt's not possible - the article has been put in a deleted articles category or something to prevent subsequent re-creation. Dunno why, I guess they have their reasons.Fantomas 12:52, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
testGeo.Site Sheriff 14:08, 18 May 2007 (EDT) Site Sheriff(Sysop)Geo. 14:10, 18 May 2007 (EDT) FelicitacionesGRACIAS Your template(s)Hello Geo.plrd.
You were the creator of the {{ClayPin}} template, and perhaps others also. Since late May 2007, Conservapedia requires that all templates be properly documented. Please see Creating templates for instructions on this. If the template(s) are not documented, they will be deleted. Thank you for your co-operation in this. Alternatively, if a particular template is no longer required, please delete it.Thanks for that.
Philip J. Rayment 05:58, 2 June 2007 (EDT)
Geo, thanks for putting them on the template list, but they also need to be documented on each template's page. I've done {{ClayPin}} for you as an example, although I'm not sure of a couple of points, so please review that one as well. Philip J. Rayment 22:56, 4 June 2007 (EDT) AIM?Aim! Please message. Read my posts there. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 13:33, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
blah--Geo.Complain! 17:49, 18 June 2007 (EDT)Moon and the TimesThis fact is clearly stated in our entry for the paper - why shouldn't it be in the Moon entry? Guitarplayer 21:02, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
UncyclopediaLook, can you unlock the Uncyclopedia article? There's hardly anything on there and more is needed, but we can't edit it because you've protected it! Why did you protect it for? There's no reason to. Please unprotect ScorpionVote for Pedro 18:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT) When and if you make it back, Scorpion, Geo might be able to answer you, or not. This isn't WP. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:13, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
Uncyclopedia, despite being a parody of Wikipedia, supports much of the same material that Wikipedia does. They take an obviously liberal stance, and much of their humor is directed at Christian and Conservative values. In particular, their article on Conservapedia is composed mostly of hate speech, labelling Conservatives as "retards". In addition, they attack creationism via a "pro-creationist" article, which mocks creationism by phrases like "evolution will get you sent straight to hell" and "Darwin was a **** Satanist". At any rate, it is clear that Uncyclopedia hates Christians and creationism, and aims to destroy Conservativism. ScorpionVote for Pedro 09:50, 29 June 2007 (EDT) ScorpioUser:Scorpio has been blocked for one week for twice removing discussion page comments from RSchlafly'es page. http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&diff=217145&oldid=216629 http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&diff=prev&oldid=217848
Geoffrey, you can begin examination of the facts right here, and determine if User:Scorpio has become a meatpuppet of TK. TK offered to block Scorpio on the discussion list (available in the Search engine) and privately. Since the Conley email, it appears TK contacted Scorpio, and TK has further intiated other actions that have no transparency. In the meantime, I await you forwarding me any and all transcripts of discussions on processes. Scorpio will remain blocked for information destruction from RSchlafly's page. RobS 19:41, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
Greetings, fellow judge!Hi, Geo. I have accepted the team captains' appointment as a judge. Thus far, I've put in for the consideration of having our own namespace so that we can "retire to chambers" as we weigh the "evidence."--TerryHTalk 09:31, 9 July 2007 (EDT) Welcome, Geo, as a Judge! I've created a new namespace that only Judges can access. I can't even access it. You might create a page in it like Judges:Contest (note that I cannot even create that page).--Aschlafly 12:36, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
McCarthy mediationGeo, I invite you over to the McCarthy Discussion page for a mediation issue that I'm hoping you can resolve. Thank you. Scorpio 22:56, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
Geoff, thanks for making the change but there is an extra "period" in the new sentence so I'm going have to fix that. Also, I don't think there was a need for a new section for the "Moynihan" info since it's essentially related to the Venona info and should be included in that parapraph. Would you mind terribly if I simply reverted back to the latest changes which you authorized me to do last night? It would make the flow of the article more concise. I would appreciate that. Please let me know. Thank you. Scorpio 10:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Full IP address?I am concerned about the publishing of the full IP address of users. Does this conflict with Conservapedia:Privacy policy. Is Conservapedia:Shame in conflict with sharing private information with the world? I am not sure if that page is what is being used to report vandalism to the authorities. --Mtur 17:54, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
contestWho is winning at this time? Or are you not allowed to say? Bohdan 01:12, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
Hahaha! But I can unblock myself! :P --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 01:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT) ScoresJust wondering if you know and could tell me the final scores of Team1 and Team2...Aschlafly and I are trying to figure out how close we came, and it would be a lot easier to just have the final numbers! Thanks, DeborahB. 17:42, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
categorizing articlesHi! :) Thanks for adding a new article. Please, though, categorize your articles when you create them; while there are those of us who will go through and clean-up the uncategorized articles, you know your subject better than we do. For a list of categories, go here: Special:Categories. To add a category to your article, type two open brackets, then "category:" followed by the category you want. Just add two closed brackets and you're done! You can add as many categories as you feel are appropriate. Thanks! Aziraphale 20:41, 16 August 2007 (EDT)
Well, "accidents" do happen..... --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 22:19, 17 August 2007 (EDT) New McCarthy article blockGeo, is there any way that you can arrange it so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthhy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. Scorpio 10:30, 2 September 2007 (EDT) |