Last modified on May 21, 2009, at 05:55

User talk:Gnosis

Return to "Gnosis" page.


Hello, Gnosis, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Gnosis!

₮K/Admin/Talk 18:46, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

Reverting AdministratorsEdit

Please avail youself of the links above, and read them before you continue to edit, okay? Conservapedia doesn't operate on a deceitful mobocracy basis. Thanks. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:46, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

Sorry, what? --Gnosis 18:48, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
Don't revert, not ever, the content added by a Conservapedia Administrator. Is that clearly stated? You reverted as "weasel words" text added by the Site Owner. Like I suggested above, try reading the links provided. Thanks, your cooperation is appreciated. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:51, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
That's fine. I got the message. I'm just not sure what you meant about "deceitful mobocracy." --Gnosis 18:54, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
See How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia for specifics, and our Editors guide. Any additional questions, please just let me know...happy to answer. --₮K/Admin/Talk 18:58, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
Interesting read. And thanks for the offer - I may take you up on it in the future. I apologize for the bad start we got off to. --Gnosis 19:06, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

Final warning....Edit

You are certainly busy, Geosis. However fair warning about inserting, or debating, or asking for relativist information to be inserted: It will not fly here. For "facts" of that kind, might I suggest Wikipedia? But here at Conservapedia moral equivelancy that liberals try to inject into arguments, such as Black/Gay is rejected. Totally. Perhaps I am just misunderstanding the semantics of it all, your thinking. Perhaps not... --₮K/Admin/Talk 00:30, 20 May 2009 (EDT)

I understand where you're coming from on the "homosexuality is a choice" issue, and I think you might want to re-read the comment I left on Ed Poor's talk page. I was acknowledging that as part of the premise of the argument before making a suggestion on how to improve the argument. As I stated, "Both lifestyles [Homosexuality and Judaism] are choices and both groups have been persecuted for their lifestyles." --Gnosis 13:34, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
Thanks, Gnois. --₮K/Admin/Talk 01:55, 21 May 2009 (EDT)