Difference between revisions of "User talk:HenryS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by MrF (Talk); changed back to last version by DeanS)
(Reply to Ames)
Line 121: Line 121:
 
Hi!  So, yes, Bohdan, it was mean, but it was also accurate.  The gaybashing this man trumps up is significantly worse - but comparable to - the lies he puts up about evolution and liberals.  He's an embarrassment who's afraid of conflict, because he'll be proved wrong.-[[User:TJefferson|TJefferson]] 19:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
Hi!  So, yes, Bohdan, it was mean, but it was also accurate.  The gaybashing this man trumps up is significantly worse - but comparable to - the lies he puts up about evolution and liberals.  He's an embarrassment who's afraid of conflict, because he'll be proved wrong.-[[User:TJefferson|TJefferson]] 19:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
:Did you just call me a "but"?  You really are ''very'' unkind. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]]
 
:Did you just call me a "but"?  You really are ''very'' unkind. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]]
 +
 +
== Reply to Ames ==
 +
 +
No, your examples are not true. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:09, 8 May 2008

Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, HenryS, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, HenryS!


₮K/Talk 23:59, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Now I see that you are back. Great. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 21:08, 1 November 2007 (EDT)

Welcome back!--Aschlafly 22:14, 11 January 2008 (EST)

Are you back? --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)

My vandal counter

It's there, but I had to hide it, because it attracted too many Bohdans vandals. HelpJazz 00:03, 5 February 2008 (EST)

Could you have a read of Holodomor denial. Thanks.--Bandurist 12:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Sysop

Welcome back to your Sysop status, Bohdan! We've missed you, and your expertise about Eastern Europe.--Aschlafly 14:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks! But I might not be very active... Nevertheles, I will try to help. Bohdan 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)
Congratulations Bohdan. Absentismens 01:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Question

Is there a place I can ask the community as a whole something?--FellowChristian16 16:36, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

I also have a question. Currently there are three broken redirects. Should I delete the redirects and request deletion of the page? or just name the pages and allow a sysop to delete them? DrCB 21:35, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

Really random

I was taking a nap today and you were in my dream. I had a dream that my real life cat (who's name is Jazz... my secret's out) was actually a housefly, and not a cat. And then my cousin found out that she was actually a unicorn and she was flying around the house trying to catch and eat my pet fly. And then it wasn't my pet cat/fly named Jazz, it was my pet cat/fly named Bohdan. I was all like "oh no, cousin! Don't eat Bohdan, I will be sad!"

I have strange dreams. HelpJazz 22:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

I am so honored :) Bohdan 22:39, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

deletion of lawyer values

Dear Bohdan,

Could you please explain why you deleted this article?

thanks--JBuscombe 16:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT) also what is this WP:POINT?--JBuscombe 16:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

It was unencyclopedic, and obviously just a response to professor values. If you have a problem with that article, go to the talk page. Please do not create unencyclopedic articles to make a point. It is disruptive. Thanks, Bohdan 16:51, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

WP:POINT is a policy on wikipedia. [1] Bohdan 16:52, 28 March 2008 (EDT)


Dear Bohdan

How can you say Lawyer values is unencyclopedic and disruptive while Professor values are not? It was not just a response to the Professor values, but was inspired by it! I do not believe it was in any way disruptive. I am sure the public opinion about lawyers are more in line with what I wrote while the public still respect Professors. --JBuscombe 17:04, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

I point you to the newly-created tu quoque. You don't have to show that professor values is right to show that lawyer values is wrong. HelpJazz 21:35, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
I actually never said I consider professor values to be encyclopedic. But the author of that article is the owner of the site, and he has said before that it won't be deleted. Please take any issues you have with professor values to its talk page. Thanks, Bohdan 17:57, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that doesn't exist on this site? --Gulik5 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
No. Please read the above discussion, especially where I say it was unencyclopedic. Bohdan 20:51, 29 March 2008 (EDT)

The CP Commandments demand the truth. Bohdan was right, IMO. However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --₮K/Talk 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Request

Dear Bohdan, I am currently trying to get night edit rights so that I can better contribute to Conservapedia. As a sysop who has had experience working with me, I would like to ask for your support. If you feel that I deserve edit rights, please say so here. If you do not think I deserve them, I fully understand and I thank you anyway. Sincerely, HelpJazz 01:19, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

EdBot

I had a feeling that letting it sleep only 6 seconds between edits would trigger something. Thanks for the unblock. --Ed Poor Talk 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

I will keep an eye on this guard dog. He will regret the next time he messes with Edbot. Bohdan 20:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

Admin review

Speaking of regret, what do you think of my block on User:Adg2011? --Ed Poor Talk 22:00, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

I just logged in now. A quick look at his contribs reveals some POV edits, but mostly talk page complaining. I probably wouldn't have blocked him for what I saw, but I just glanced. Was there something specific he was blocked for? Bohdan 22:09, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
Almost in violation of 90/10, and too many reverts. Not an auspicious start. --Ed Poor Talk 22:12, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
agreed. Bohdan 22:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

I am sorry

I will never again forget to sign my posts. Nor will I press the tilde key one too many times. Nor will I sign on a mainspace page, then forget to sign on a talk page. Please accept my utmost apologies. ~~

PS: I saw when you unblocked me the other night. I was doing my work, then all the sudden I had this urge to stop working. I look at the recent changes and lo and behold, Bohdan unblocked me. ~

Subliminal messages

I don't know, but I feel somehow you want me to get in touch with you. Could it be a subliminal message of some kind? --Ed Poor Talk 15:10, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

If it will help......

I will be pleased to address you as Henry! --₮K/Talk 22:57, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Don't forget the "s". HenryS 00:09, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
There's more than one of you? That's confusing! HelpJazz 00:11, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
Sorry, HenryS, but my earlier post was made before the transmogrification was made from Henry to HenryS. ;-) I was just a bit ahead of you and Andy. --₮K/Talk 00:14, 9 April 2008 (EDT)

Contribution warning

I took ASchafly's warning about the 90/10 rule seriously, and have only posted a few brief questions (and a fact about superdelegates he acknowledged as helpful) since then, instead of engaging in long debates as I've done prior. I'm researching some articles to contribute, but if even this level of talk activity is a violation, then I'm not sure if this site is worth the effort. I may be verbose, but I've always felt that a thoughtful, respectful discussion about controversial issues can be as educational as the underlying articles themselves. --DinsdaleP 00:19, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

It less of a warning, more like friendly advice so there would be no warning. And while thoughtful and respectful discussion about issues is educational, it won't help the encyclopedia grow, nor benefit the article readers who have no interest in talk pages. HenryS 00:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

"taking out the trash"

You do know that you just completely confirmed that Conservative was talking about and to a site Conservapedia is apparently afraid of to the degree of putting its name into the spam filter, right?

But riddle me this: If sysops openly address that satellite in specifically created userspace articles, why is explicitly mentioning it apparently classified as "trash"? --MilesM 20:07, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Let it go, friend, let it go. HenryS 20:12, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
You tried to deceive me and another user when we asked a question, and then you labeled my comments (and those of others) as "trash". I'm sorry, but I don't think that this is a good basis to call someone "friend".
Also, the combination of "site name in spam filter + attempted to mislead users + wiping out any mention of the name" is basically telling people to most definitely go there. If so much work has been done to deny the existence of a site, then it just has to be extremely interesting.
But hey, I've seen the extremes you're willing to go to, so I won't bring the site name on this site here. --MilesM 20:26, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
Okay, online acquaintance. Go ahead and go there if you want. But here, please drop this and don't bring it up again. Thanks, HenryS 20:31, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
You got it, Long Feng. --MilesM 20:42, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

ThanksDalek

You can't be serious about calling HelpJazz "too liberal" on your userpage. That would be horrible thing to say about another contributor, (especially since a number of admins support him being granted night-editing rights)Dalek 16:23, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

Joke. I am one of the admins who supports him. HenryS 16:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

thanks

Thank you for that recent block you just made, I was looking for an admin to report it to. ^.^ --ITSAMEMARIO 21:37, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

You're welcome. HenryS 21:39, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

A major online conservative christian newspaper.....

A major online conservative christian newspaper is very interested in regards to Conservapedia's atheism article and the reporter said she would very likely do a story on it. She said her readers are VERY interested in the subject of atheism and the story that we are promoting our article and that some major Christian internet ministries have started to feature our article is a good story. I am making the conservapedia atheism article the article of the month which I think fits in nicely with the Expelled controversy. I have sent Andy an email on this matter and I am awaiting an answer. Conservative 14:45, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

Wow. Sounds exciting. Which newspaper is it? HenryS 16:02, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for the welcome. BUT.

Hi! So, yes, Bohdan, it was mean, but it was also accurate. The gaybashing this man trumps up is significantly worse - but comparable to - the lies he puts up about evolution and liberals. He's an embarrassment who's afraid of conflict, because he'll be proved wrong.-TJefferson 19:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

Did you just call me a "but"? You really are very unkind. HenryS

Reply to Ames

No, your examples are not true. HenryS 20:09, 8 May 2008 (EDT)