Difference between revisions of "User talk:JLauttamus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Malik last quote)
(→‎New Users)
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 16:05, 22 May 2008 (EDT)}}
+
Archive:
 +
[[/1|1]]
  
−
== Creation science ==
+
== Marking pages as spam ==
  
−
I see you have reverted my edit in the second sentence without discussion.  You appear to have missed the point.  I made that particular change because I understand the the 6000 year figure was not necessarily used by all religions.  Do Hindus for example agree on that figure? --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:03, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
+
Thanks for your work! In the future, though, you can just replace the text of spam pages with the template <nowiki>{{spam}}</nowiki>.  Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] 09:12, 11 October 2012 (EDT)
−
:I disagree with the point that the entire sentence is making.  I don't think that most advocates of creation science believe that the earth is 6,000 years old.  I'm not very well-versed on Hindu views.  However, as I said in the edit summary, there are other advocates of YEC.  I don't think it is correct or fair to single out Christians in that statement.  If you're going for specificity, then you should qualify with all 3 Abrahamic religions.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:07, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
+
−
::You make a valid point.  Perhaps the introduction should first of all make some distinction between the creation science views of various religious groups before going on to nominate the 6000 year period for Christians (and whoever else uses it).  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:11, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
+
−
:::I don't touch the religious articles.  I stick to politics and medicine.  Your point is valid and well-taken.  It's definitely something you should bring up on the talk page.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:14, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
+
  
−
== Award ==
+
== Good to see your edits again ==
  
−
Thanks for the award, but could you double-check the template? My reply to you seems to be rendering inside the blue box no matter what I do. Thanks again for the recognition :-) -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
+
Good to see your always-intelligent edits again!  I look forward to reading what you just wrote about [[Counterexamples to String Theory]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:14, 14 December 2012 (EST)
  
−
==Local==
+
:Thanks, Andy. I've been following the site since I went on hiatus (on a limited basis -- my wife and I are now the proud parents of a healthy 9-month old, so free time isn't always there!) and am glad to contribute what little bit that I can. --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:18, 14 December 2012 (EST)
−
Hello, I'm from the Pittsburgh area as well.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 11:55, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
:Oh, wow. Good to meet another Burgh Boy!  I actually live in Northern WV, but I work in Pittsburgh.  I'm about 15 miles west of the city.  Which end of the city do you live on?  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 11:57, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
::I'm southeast, near Monroeville.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 11:59, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
:::Yeah, I'm kind of foreign to that area.  I work up by the zoo in Aspinwall, though a good friend of mine lives on the South Side.  The only time I ever really make it into the city is for sports games (Pens, Stillers, Pirates).  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 12:02, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
:::And I see you're a Social D fan.  Quite the punk scene here in Pittsburgh.  I got to see Antiflag when they were here last April up at Mr. Smalls.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 12:04, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
::::Yes, I live for Social D.  There is a pretty decent punk scene here.  The Misfits were just in town on Friday, also at Mr. Smalls.  Monroeville is just a short trip West on the parkway (I-376) to Pittsburgh.  Sporting events are usually my only reason for downtown travel as well, because it is one of the toughest cities to navigate.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 14:21, 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
−
==Ted==
+
−
Ted didn't make the edit to add User:Human as you stared on his talk page.  That edit was made by [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Body&diff=prev&oldid=517535 Sideways].  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 13:45, 12 January 2009 (EST)
+
−
:Thanks, Wesley (Wes?).  I made sure to strike out the comment.  I feel like a real jerk...looks like I need to be more careful!  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:51, 12 January 2009 (EST)
+
−
::Just happened to catch it.  And, yes, Wes is fine.  Everyone calls me that!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 14:04, 12 January 2009 (EST)
+
  
−
==Please don't==
 
−
What I have written is accurate despite what you say. Please leave the article on SMON alone. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 15:50, 12 January 2009 (EST)
 
−
:You have yet to provide evidence that every administration of the drug causes SMON.  I concede that it is neurotoxic in high doses, and also concede that it was a mistaken diagnosis.  However, not every administration of clioquinol resulted in neuro-degeneterive effects, let alone SMON.  SOME did, and I concede that point as well.  All the evidence I could find supports that high doses of clioquinol cause SMON; I cannot find evidence that every administration has.  Please show your sources for your claim and I will not alter the statement.  I'm merely after accuracy and trustworthiness. [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 15:57, 12 January 2009 (EST)
 
  
−
==vandal revert==
+
== You are posting comments with different user names ==
−
Thank you , I am monitoring from my mobile phone and it would have time consuming to had reverted all those, thanks again. --jpatt
+
  
−
==I got a feeling...==
 
−
..that Pittsburgh is going to get it's sixth Super Bowl win!  Go Steelers!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 22:40, 18 January 2009 (EST)
 
  
−
==Vending machines==
+
You just used 2 names to post comments on the main page - RyanFT & DGalore.
−
I thought the liberal machine had gotten rid of all the cigarette vending machines, when they started disappearing in the late 80s or early 90s. Nice factoid about there still being some states -- those holdouts die hard, don't they? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:41, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
+
−
:There's still cigarette vending machines in Pennsylvania, as well.  Of course they charge an arm and a leg (some as high as $8.00 per pack).  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 17:43, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
+
−
::(EC) Yeah, I was really suprised to still find one, but then I found another one in Ohio!  I think it may be illegal to have them in some public places, but I know of at least 5 bars in the tri-state area (WV, PA, and OH) that still have them!  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:44, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
+
−
:::With those keen skills at finding hidden beasts, you should switch careers and start leading safaris. :-) -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:58, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
+
  
 +
comments posted by RyanFT
  
 +
'Another shooting?
  
−
== Sorry ==
+
Is Facebook or a computer game at fault this time? Or maybe it's just too easy.'
  
−
Sorry, I didn't realize you'd made a substantial change to the article. I was reverting what the guy before you did. I remedied it and re-entered your section. I'm really sorry for the mix up. [[User:ChuckR|ChuckR]] 19:15, 5 November 2009 (EST)
+
comments posted by DGalore
−
:Oh, no worries man.  I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't messing up something that you had put a lot of time into, that's all.  No apologies necessary!  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:27, 5 November 2009 (EST)
+
  
−
== Malik last quote ==
+
'Grand Theft Auto features "mall rampages"
  
−
Please do not delete that fundamental quote. It is important to understand this horror. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 19:18, 6 November 2009 (EST)
+
No it doesn't. It features various sorts of criminal violence but nothing involving a shopping mall or resembling this kind of incident. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DGalore (talk)'
−
:I didn't delete the quote. It's in the paragraph right above where you had it. I italicized it to make it stand out a bit better. I thought it looked awkward having it stand by itself. I wouldn't remove important article content, my friend. That I can assure you. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:21, 6 November 2009 (EST)
+
 
 +
Both posts were made under your user name. Please explain yourself. [[User:EJamesW|EJamesW]] 15:10, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:EJamesW, if you look under the history for the talk page, both editors you've listed show up with edits. I believe you've misread the situation. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:13, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
::I didn't post the comments; look at the edit history. I added the ''<nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki>'' tag to the posts, as they were (obviously) unsigned. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 16:01, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
::http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1023158&oldid=1023156
 +
::http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1023159&oldid=1023158
 +
::Edit history for what you're describing. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 16:29, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Sorry JLauttamus, It seems I messed up! I hope you accept my apology. 17:56, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:No problems, mate. It was in good faith. Ironically enough you didn't sign that post. ;-) -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:57, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== New Users ==
 +
 
 +
If a New user is a spammer there is not much point in welcoming them as the account is just a ''pump and dump'' account operated by some slave in communist China. Please look at what they have posted before issueing them with welcome notices. The <nowiki> {{warning}} </nowiki> template is also useful. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 19:29, 14 December 2012 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:All I saw was line break HTML tags; I didn't even look at the content of the page. I wasn't aware that "spamming" was an issue here. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:31, 14 December 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:31, December 15, 2012

Archive: 1

Marking pages as spam

Thanks for your work! In the future, though, you can just replace the text of spam pages with the template {{spam}}. Thanks, GregG 09:12, 11 October 2012 (EDT)

Good to see your edits again

Good to see your always-intelligent edits again! I look forward to reading what you just wrote about Counterexamples to String Theory.--Andy Schlafly 14:14, 14 December 2012 (EST)

Thanks, Andy. I've been following the site since I went on hiatus (on a limited basis -- my wife and I are now the proud parents of a healthy 9-month old, so free time isn't always there!) and am glad to contribute what little bit that I can. --Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 14:18, 14 December 2012 (EST)


You are posting comments with different user names

You just used 2 names to post comments on the main page - RyanFT & DGalore.

comments posted by RyanFT

'Another shooting?

Is Facebook or a computer game at fault this time? Or maybe it's just too easy.'

comments posted by DGalore

'Grand Theft Auto features "mall rampages"

No it doesn't. It features various sorts of criminal violence but nothing involving a shopping mall or resembling this kind of incident. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DGalore (talk)'

Both posts were made under your user name. Please explain yourself. EJamesW 15:10, 14 December 2012 (EST)

EJamesW, if you look under the history for the talk page, both editors you've listed show up with edits. I believe you've misread the situation. SharonW 15:13, 14 December 2012 (EST)
I didn't post the comments; look at the edit history. I added the {{unsigned}} tag to the posts, as they were (obviously) unsigned. -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 16:01, 14 December 2012 (EST)
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1023158&oldid=1023156
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AMain_Page&action=historysubmit&diff=1023159&oldid=1023158
Edit history for what you're describing. -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 16:29, 14 December 2012 (EST)


Sorry JLauttamus, It seems I messed up! I hope you accept my apology. 17:56, 14 December 2012 (EST)

No problems, mate. It was in good faith. Ironically enough you didn't sign that post. ;-) -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 17:57, 14 December 2012 (EST)

New Users

If a New user is a spammer there is not much point in welcoming them as the account is just a pump and dump account operated by some slave in communist China. Please look at what they have posted before issueing them with welcome notices. The {{warning}} template is also useful. Dvergne 19:29, 14 December 2012 (EST)

All I saw was line break HTML tags; I didn't even look at the content of the page. I wasn't aware that "spamming" was an issue here. -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:31, 14 December 2012 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:JLauttamus&oldid=1023207"