User talk:Jpatt/2009

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search



JPatt, I know in the past I have immaturely vandalized this site, but this whole Climategate scandal has really opened my mind. I would like to ask you to help me expand my article on Climategate--CarlMcK 15:00, 27 November 2009 (EST)

Welcome back but you know I have to show you the door. Newly converted soul, watch this video on ClimateGate Hide The Decline

Editing my user page?

I don't mean to pick a fight with a Sysop, but it is legal for you to delete things from my user page. Isn't on of the rule "we don't censor"? Just wondering. Until then I will revert my user page, if you have a problem with that, feel free to undo any of my actions. Also, I have some Hebrew on my user page, please be careful not to mess it up. --JewishConservative 17:58, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Sysops have the power here, regardless if your page. Mentioning those rats is forbidden here, it will have to be removed. Don't take personally, it is a rule.--Jpatt 22:44, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

I apologize, but can you please post a link to show me where this rule is? I'm not questioning weather it is there or not, I just won't be 100% happy with this closure until i find that rule.--JewishConservative 23:06, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Unspoken rule, no rats ever, no mentioning rats, no rat pages allowed. Don't take my word for it, go straight to the top. user:Aschlafly --Jpatt 23:13, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
Let me help everyone out here. Check out Conservapedia:Administrators: "Administrators and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Hope that helps..we do want you to be happy. --₮K/Admin/Talk 13:12, 26 May 2009 (EDT)
Thanks for clearing that up T to the K.--Jpatt 17:15, 26 May 2009 (EDT)

Baghdad story

Did you even follow through on reading the actual article that all of those blogs referred to? The figures given [2] were for all of Iraq not Baghdad and only totaled the number of American soldiers not total war related deaths which include civilians. Factoring in those we get 7,496 which includes civilians and security forces.--Lynus 23:19, 8 January 2009 (EST)

--Thanks for pointing out that tiny error.--Jpatt 23:26, 8 January 2009 (EST)

Tiny error? Seems like a pretty big one considering that you simply went off a headline on a blog and mixed up a city from a country and the fact that the figures are off by a factor of 10.--Lynus 23:34, 8 January 2009 (EST)
Whatever. --Jpatt 23:49, 8 January 2009 (EST)
BTW, the headline is still incorrect and refers to Baghdad.--Lynus 23:54, 8 January 2009 (EST)
Still a true statement. --Jpatt 23:57, 8 January 2009 (EST)
Well if we exclude black people then the headline, "No black people were killed on 9/11" is a true statement.--Lynus 00:07, 9 January 2009 (EST)
You are better than me, big deal. Another sysop corrected already.--Jpatt 00:08, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Satan/ Democratic Party

I'm sorry, I'm new here, could you tell me what I did wrong?--SamSnith Febuary 2

What was wrong is you took a serious article here and made nonsensical insertions. Granted that Planned Parenthood is as evil as they get but it is not for the Satan article. Plus you added factless assertion that most people don't worship Satan. I would disagree, if most people put money before God, that is Satan calling.--Jpatt 02:03, 2 February 2009 (EST)

News project

Jp, how would you like to be co-project leader of the news project? In recognition of your contributions to the news project and your recent promotion to sysop, I would appreciate your assistance in leading the news project. --DeanStalk 01:19, 3 January 2009 (EST)

What do my duties entail? Yes, I am interested. --Jpatt 01:20, 3 January 2009 (EST)
1. Posting news suggestions and wanted page links to the news page. 2. Archiving completed wanted pages. 3. Recruiting new members to the project. 4. Encouraging current members to contribute. 5. Suggest improvements to the project. --DeanStalk 01:28, 3 January 2009 (EST)

Congratulations on your first news post to the Main Page using Template:Mainpageright‎. --DeanStalk 12:46, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks Dean--Jpatt 12:48, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Jp, We currently have 80 Wanted pages. Any ideas on motivating our project members to make progress on this list? --DeanStalk 00:57, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Jp, as the news co-project leader, I would appreciate your input to my recommendation to delete the news suggestions section of the project. --DeanStalk 11:20, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Thanks Dean, I say delete however Talk:Mainpage is the location for this type of information. How do we associate with? --jpatt 17:58, 9 February 2009 (EST)
What do you mean "How do we associate with?" --DeanStalk 19:36, 9 February 2009 (EST)
Well, Talk:Mainpage is essentially comprised of questions regarding Wikiproject:News items. I count eight Headlines that say "News" and the rest comment on a News item. I suggest instead of News/Suggestions we should make Talk:Mainpage a part of WikiProject:News, possibly by template.--jpatt 21:53, 9 February 2009 (EST)
Ok, I understand. I don't think we need to make Talk:Mainpage a part of WikiProject:News; I think it should remain as it is, but we can be on the lookout for possible news items. --DeanStalk 22:36, 9 February 2009 (EST)


Congratulations on your promotion! --DinsdaleP 13:15, 4 January 2009 (EST)

--Thanks, much appreciated!--Jpatt 23:15, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Kamaunamauna fake article

Hi JPatt, thank you for deleting the "Kamaunamauna" nonsense article made by a parodist earlier today. Since the user who created the page has been blocked for inserting false info, do you think the user's page should be deleted as well? located here: - My concern in this is that when a page is deleted, it no longer appears in the users contribution history, so the user could ask for a review of the block, and someone who does not remember the fake/parody pages were deleted might not see the reason for the block. Thanks - Taj 20:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Thx, deleted.--Jpatt 22:25, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Thank you very much! :-) Taj 22:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)

The page is back. Can we delete/protect? WesleySHello! 09:46, 2 February 2009 (EST)


Hi JPatt, I don't think Obama should be included in the Prominent Muslim section as there is no definitive evidence that he is one. The basis for his inclusion there is based on circumstantial evidence. Therefore it is opinion not fact. This does not correspond with fair and balanced ethic of this wiki. -- unsigned user

BTW I am not an Obama supporter! -- unsigned user

Can you prove he isn't Liberalist! I thought not, so on behath of JPatt, be quiet! --Deadpool

So let's just put baseless claims on every left-winger's page...oh wait, we already have.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Jselin (talk)

I would debate you but.... the merits of the people involved and the network Obama NBC Channel combined, useless. I bet you think the TEA Party is baseless too! --Jpatt 19:13, 15 December 2009 (EST)

Population control

Wow, that's an insightful addition you just made to Essay:Best New Conservative Words!--Andy Schlafly 23:49, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Thank you, and thank you for creating this invaluable resource.--Jpatt 00:00, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks and Help

Thanks for the welcome.

I've ran into a few problems already, one being that accessing Conservapedia:Desk gives me "A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was: (SQL query hidden) from within function "MathRenderer::_recall". MySQL returned error "1267: Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation '=' (localhost)"."--Tyler 01:45, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Ok, I'll just have to wait then. My other problem is that I created a new page for Sean Hannity's new show Hannity and for some reason Hannity & Colmes links to Hannity, not Hannity and Colmes. Can you help on this? Thanks.--Tyler 01:50, 2 February 2009 (EST)
I'm having a lot more trouble, I can't access this site from home. I keep getting a "Forbidden" error and it says it couldn't find the 404 page, I can't access any part of the site. When I try from a proxy or my Blackberry (which I'm on) and it loads fine. I don't know what's up, if its the site or me. If you could please ask around to whoever runs the site and see if it could be on my end, it would be much appreiceated. You can email me using the email this user thing or at - thanks! - TylerG (can't sign on BB)

Also thanks for the welcome!WayneInNV 00:52, 11 April 2009 (EDT)

Reverted edits

I see you reverted my edits on plutonium and uranium. What was the problem? What does the "cutnpaste URL" in your edit descriptions mean? --Fairfieldrr 19:32, 12 February 2009 (EST)

I questioned your edits because they were word for word the same on other websites. Since the description of those items may not change much between sites, I may have been too hasty.--jpatt 20:28, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Actually, the version present before my edits was the copy/paste (a fact of which I hadn't been aware of until now). Should I erase everything in the current versions and start over, or should the articles first be deleted by an admin and then restarted? --Fairfieldrr 20:42, 12 February 2009 (EST)
If you can prove that the initial work came from elsewhere, feel free to remove. No need for a complete delete.--jpatt 20:58, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Please block vandal

Johnqpublic111 just signed up and added plagiarized material to Reagan. ReneeStJ 20:47, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Thanks ReneeStJ, done--jpatt 20:58, 12 February 2009 (EST)

L'Hopital's Rule

May I inquire as to why the article on L'Hopital's Rule was deleted? The content seemed far from "non-encyclopedic". --Economist 18:22, 13 February 2009 (EST)

We include English only pages here. If it's of importance or of value and you want to re-add without all the symbols, be my guest. --jpatt 18:26, 13 February 2009 (EST)
Perhaps I can recreate it and add some more clarification than it had, but I think that symbols are of key importance in an article on a mathematical topic. --Economist 18:29, 13 February 2009 (EST)

Survivors Article

Thanks for creating the article about the Abortion Survivors organization! It's real good. AddisonDM 20:27, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Good block

Good block of "Ed17"! An additionanl reason for blocking, which applied to Ed17, is an non-factual or snide remark in the edit summary.--Andy Schlafly 15:44, 20 February 2009 (EST)

Slow down on Taiwan blocks

Jpatt, the name of the government on the island of Taiwan is Republic of China. Even if a user was shrill about this, we might not have to remove them from the project. Better to teach them our ways. --Ed Poor Talk 16:16, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Reinstatement is in order, thanks.--jpatt 16:18, 22 February 2009 (EST)


Hello, Jpatt. I was wondering about the category redirect you placed in Category:Catholicism redirecting to Catholic Church. It makes it a bit difficult to get to the articles within the category. WesleySHello! 09:40, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

WesleyS, change how you see fit.--jpatt 12:20, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
Thanks, just thought I'd ask first! WesleySHello! 12:35, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

Muslim agenda of the Obama administration

Please take a look at my edits to Muslim agenda of the Obama administration and its talk page and let me know if it looks alright. Thanks. --SStaples 22:50, 2 April 2009 (EDT)

It's our wiki Staples, mine and yours. Improve on it is always the best option.--Jpatt 22:59, 2 April 2009 (EDT)

Fifth Great Awakening Essay

Take a look JPatt. I added five images, two of which I created myself. I'd like maybe one more, but how does it look? AddisonDM 02:04, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

Looks great, Miley is a bombshell.--Jpatt 00:09, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
I guess than can be taken as a good thing! :). Thanks. Wasn't sure about the Obama image, but I think it works. AddisonDM 13:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)

Your comments or suggestions

Christianity in Conservapedia ??? --Joaquín Martínez 23:30, 8 April 2009 (EDT)

I love it. I have been following your Christian Cross entry. Love to see saints/doctors of the church listed. --Jpatt 23:51, 8 April 2009 (EDT)

Great blocks

Great blocks, on Good Friday no less!--Andy Schlafly 22:13, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Thanks, Happy Easter! --Jpatt 22:16, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Block summary

I was looking through the recent logs and was disturbed to find a vulgar comment in a block made by you in which you made a rather distasteful accusation/joke about the user Susanrose. SimonAG 16:59, 11 April 2009 (EDT)

Sorry to hear you are disturbed, I guess innocent until proven guilty next time.--Jpatt 17:12, 11 April 2009 (EDT)
I think it was the hypocrisy of it more than anything. Looking through the list it appears a number of people are banned for having 'vulgar' names and yet you saw fit to make a rather vulgar comment yourself. SimonAG 18:14, 11 April 2009 (EDT)
  • Well, I think you are a moronic liberal troll, SimonAG. Do you consider that a "vulgar" comment? Perhaps you should stick with the less vulgar sites in the UK, and not continue to edit here. RobertWDP = SimonAG. Godspeed to you, bye! --₮K/Admin/Talk 22:37, 11 April 2009 (EDT)
Simon says, hehehehehe --Jpatt 22:43, 11 April 2009 (EDT)


Thanks for your help in reverting that vandalism. My word, do these people have no shame? JY23 19:54, 11 April 2009 (EDT)

No problem, it is the same brit vandal from the other day, deceit and not having a girlfriend keeps this dummy busy here. --Jpatt 20:00, 11 April 2009 (EDT)

Thank You!

I was starting to feel like it was a losing battle! --Benp 22:47, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

You're a good man Ben, thank you for your vigilance--Jpatt 22:53, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Happy Easter

I think that's everything, and if not, we're likely to trip over each other if we're both reverting. So I'll bid you a good night and a happy Easter. --Benp 22:52, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Telling me to not edit pages?

Who are you to tell me I can't edit pages? Are you really going to tell me conservapedia has all correct information? We put whatwe believe on this site.

Traditionalvalues12 11:44, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

Great block and revert

Great block and revert this morning!--Andy Schlafly 10:44, 19 April 2009 (EDT)

Andy you are welcome. You don't need to thank me, it is my duty to defend this great site. --Jpatt 10:49, 19 April 2009 (EDT)

Tillmann pics

Hey! So why don't we just put the pics vertically to the right of the awards? (I'll do this now so that you can see what I'm talking about, feel free to revert).--IDuan 16:15, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

Thanks Iduan, I was having trouble with pic formatting, looks good.--Jpatt 16:18, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

Google Android

Hey Jpatt! I was just wondering why Google Android shouldn't be in the category Category:Operating Systems.--IDuan 17:42, 27 April 2009 (EDT)

Ahh - nevermind! I see we agree :) - thanks anyway!--IDuan 17:48, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
Thanks again Iduan. First, it was listed category:Operating system, not working. Then tried category:Operating Systems, didn't work. Your solution worked category:Operating_Systems. The underscore should not have made a diff, but it did 4 some reason. --Jpatt 17:51, 27 April 2009 (EDT)

Newly Joined

Thanks for the greeting! Made an edit to the B-29 page since I worked on nuclear weapons and have researched nuke wpn accidents (published book). Anyway, learning the ropes and any help is appreciated. Mhmm 09:04, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

Mother's Day

Congratulations! Good work! --Joaquín Martínez 12:51, 10 May 2009 (EDT)

Josephus' Edits

I noticed you reverted Josephus' edit to the Mannerheim page. Forgive my impertinence, but you might want to look at deleting the whole page as it has been copied directly from Wikipedia in direct violation of the Commandments. I already had to undo another of his edits, and it might be worth looking at his other contributions. In faith, Trueblue 09:09, 29 May 2009 (EDT)

My apologies. I see you have already done this. In fath, Trueblue 09:10, 29 May 2009 (EDT)


Thanks for adding that photo to purity ring (I wrote that article). I could never find a good image! AddisonDM 18:09, 30 May 2009 (EDT)

Glad you liked.--Jpatt 22:39, 30 May 2009 (EDT)

merit pay

"Merit pay" is a superb addition to Essay:Best New Conservative Words. Also, your blocks are terrific!--Andy Schlafly 19:09, 8 June 2009 (EDT)

I'm new here

Yeah, I'm new here, and would love some help on any tips and tricks. I was first of all wondering if there's a way I could send messages to you, if you don't mind. That way, I can become a helpful contributor to this wonderful site! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by infinity8088 (talk)

The bottom of this page has 'E-mail this user'. Let me know if I can be of assistance. Chinese believe that 8 is the symbol of infinity. (no end or no beginning) Subsequently 10,000 Chinese couples were married on 08-08-08.--Jpatt 22:58, 8 June 2009 (EDT)

Nice work!

Nice work on the Essay:Best New Conservative Words! Now if there is a word in the 1700s that could be pulled out as fluff to fit the curve ....--Andy Schlafly 20:54, 11 June 2009 (EDT)

Thanks, I looked through 1700 and those words all seem justified--Jpatt 21:07, 11 June 2009 (EDT)

You are a mind reader!

I went to dispatch that sock of a vandal site user, and you had already taken care of it! Thanks! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 18:37, 19 June 2009 (EDT)

F4U Corsair

Do you think you could add a category to that page so it doesn't stay on the Uncategorized Pages? Thanks, JY23 16:08, 22 June 2009 (EDT)


Don't forget User:FlyingPieceOfCheese, he vandalized the Video game article as well.--OscarJ 15:35, 28 June 2009 (EDT)

Fantastic capstone!

Fantastic completion of the 1-2-4-8 layer in Essay:Best New Conservative Words. "Missionary" is a fitting word to perfect it!--Andy Schlafly 19:47, 29 June 2009 (EDT)

As you can tell I really enjoy this essay. Great to see that the world was, is, and will be Conservative. --Jpatt 19:51, 29 June 2009 (EDT)
I've learned a great deal helping building that Essay:Best New Conservative Words. I spent over an hour learning important information about "textualism" before adding it, which put the layer one term away from perfection. You then perfected it.--Andy Schlafly 20:45, 29 June 2009 (EDT)

Citation template

Hi! do you know what the template now being used for citation needed? The old one brings up this:

  Rob Smith 23:52, 29 June 2009 (EDT)

I had copied that from one of RJJensen's pages. I know nothing more.--Jpatt 00:46, 30 June 2009 (EDT)

Obama birth certificate lawsuits


I see that you are a primary contributer to the Obama birth certificate lawsuits article. I also see that editing of that article is prohibited. I would like to do some cleanup work in that article. I am not a vandal—I am a recently approved Wikipedia admin with about 22,000 WP edits under my belt. How can I get edit access to the article? Wtmitchell 08:33, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

Hi, that page is not protected and you may edit at anytime--Jpatt 08:36, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

9/12 Candidates

Now that I've added 9/12 Candidates, will it be acceptable to add pages of the candidates to this wiki? It's a bit of work, but provides an opportunity for this site to cover some of the ground into politcs that may need development on the site.

Your call.


Absolutely. Be sure to follow the rules here, like adding signatures to your posts. God bless --Jpatt 15:15, 7 July 2009 (EDT)

Very nice!

"Independence" ... was a specular way to perfect the geometric fit!!!!!--Andy Schlafly 23:57, 9 July 2009 (EDT)

Glad I could contribute.--Jpatt 00:06, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

Great clean-up

Great clean-up of the liberal scum!--Andy Schlafly 21:50, 13 July 2009 (EDT)

Public summer school just let out?

I think public summer school may have just let out. Thanks for your help in blocking!--Andy Schlafly 16:09, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

I would agree. We know them for their works, which are Godless--Jpatt 16:11, 17 July 2009 (EDT)
lol Andy! Jinx McHue 16:57, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

They're keeping you busy today, I see

What pitiful little lives they must lead that harassing this site is how they find meaning. You don't even give them a chance, though. Yet still they try. Jinx McHue

After getting their kicks with internet porn, they get bored and turn to vandalize this site.--Jpatt 20:36, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

Health Care coverage

Yu vil hab heilth inschuranz und ve vil tak it out uv yur schekkin account! [1]

Good job on covering the Health Care bill! Rob Smith 12:29, 23 July 2009 (EDT)


I know you are no fan of Obama and I think August could be an important month as far as future economic freedom in the USA as Obama does not want to be defeated on the health care issue which will cause him to lose political momentum.

Would you be interested in creating these articles:

Obama admistration deficit spending

Obama administration corporate bailouts

Obama administration fiscal policy

Obama admistration monetary policy

Please let me know if you are interested as your assistance would be appreciated.conservative 04:49, 6 August 2009 (EDT)


You objected my removal of your utilizing smear tactics by relating the antichrist to Obama by posting on my talk page:

"Eight years of the left demonizing Bush, it's nice to see someone else getting the association. Relevant."

I'd like to get a response to my question (seeing how I'm failing to get a reply on my talk page): "What is an example of the left demonizing Bush based on a word association on his name?"

Regardless of precedents, this is just plain silly. Translating and manipulating words until it sounds like it resembles something is not a logical argument, and is often used by proponents of Nostradamus' predictions. I don't support this tactic, regardless of beliefs or viewpoints. ATang 11:16, 6 August 2009 (EDT)

Administrators and Bureaucrats are the final authority as to policy and procedures. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. -- Conservapedia:Guidelines

--ṬK/Admin/Talk 11:57, 6 August 2009 (EDT)

Bye Tang, enjoy your cool summer in Canada. Word association, as John Stossel says "Give me a break".--Jpatt 12:22, 6 August 2009 (EDT)

vandalism spree

There is a vandalism spree going on. There's nothing I can do about it. I hope you get this alert.

I've seen many of these before, but always after the fact. This is the first one I've seen "live". All I can do is watch. It's a little like seeing an auto accident. Helpless. PatrickD 19:53, 7 August 2009 (EDT)


Thanks for your contributions to my urology article. I am new to this site and noticed that there weren't many articles on the medical field. I am an aspiring doctor and know a lot about medicine so I will be contributing more medically related articles in the future. Hopefully you can help me out again!--JordanA 14:44, 13 August 2009 (EDT)

Obama Poster

What needs to be corrected about the Obama poster?--Andy Schlafly 21:32, 17 August 2009 (EDT)

On my screen, the image is broken.--Jpatt 21:35, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
Really? It works on my computer.
Does it work for you at 100px rather than 200px? Can you see the file image itself?--Andy Schlafly 21:54, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
I cannot see the file image when viewing with Internet Explorer nor the Chrome browser. Gives the standard broken picture error at file level.--Jpatt 22:38, 17 August 2009 (EDT)

Fascinating posting

Fascinating posting on the Main Page. I learn enormously from your edits. Thank you.--Andy Schlafly 14:40, 30 August 2009 (EDT)--Andy Schlafly 14:40, 30 August 2009 (EDT)

Simple thanks

Hi Jpatt. I rarely edit talk pages for the sake of contributing substance and not being all talk, but I just wanted to take the chance to thank you for restoring my "Judas Priest and homosexuality" section, and also for adding an informative section yourself to the article in question. These are things that should really be known about that band.--RegMac 22:26, 14 September 2009 (EDT)

Glad to assist. I get suspicious of anybody who signs up specifically to change an edit. It should be noted that he embraces that lifestyle. You know kids look up to rock stars, maybe they won't look up to him now.--Jpatt 23:21, 14 September 2009 (EDT)

Superb headline

Superb headline on Global Warming! You've become a genius at headline-writing and I've learned a great deal from your insights. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly 12:33, 15 September 2009 (EDT)

You are too kind. I have yet to reach my potential but I am working hard. --Jpatt 12:49, 15 September 2009 (EDT)

Fantastic headline again!

Wow, what a great story you just posted about the Fox News ad! I enjoyed reading that one. Oh, how liberals insist on censorship!--Andy Schlafly 17:40, 18 September 2009 (EDT)

Thank you!

Good help! --Joaquín Martínez 18:28, 19 September 2009 (EDT)

You are welcome, anytime my friend. Thank you for all your wonderful contributions, the art work is amazing.--Jpatt 18:39, 19 September 2009 (EDT)

Redirected page to Sarah Palin

How could it be? --Joaquín Martínez 18:45, 22 September 2009 (EDT)

WFriedkin block

I created an account here last night under my real name, 'WFriedkin', and you blocked me for "inappropriate or vulgar name". Yet since I created my account, I see other accounts have been created with names like 'Russell Aviation' & 'Hey Trent'? What did you perceive to be wrong about my actual name, and does my new user name pass muster with you? WalterF 12:13, 23 September 2009 (EDT)

Sacred Cow?

Is there some sort of "in-joke" that's lost on us newbies? Wayne 13:07, 23 September 2009 (EDT)

It's technical related, this is just a counter measure for unauthorized bots. --Jpatt 13:43, 23 September 2009 (EDT)

More of your moving

From what I've noticed, I don't think moving the article matters too much because the new Bluetooth has been accessed more than 250k times anyway. I think when you move an article all the statistics move with it. (I could be wrong). TimH 21:59, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

When I moved Obama birth certificate lawsuits, the original count stayed 8,195 and now as Bluetooth totals 30,000. It is fact when you delete an article and restore, it resets the page count. I believe a move is different.--Jpatt 22:03, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Silly people

See the people standing there who disagree and never win and wonder why they don't get in my door. [3]

Thanks --Ed Poor Talk 15:20, 2 October 2009 (EDT)

Today's vandalism

It looks like CP may be in for a long night with all the blog posts about the Conservative Bible Project, and I see you're working hard to keep everything under control. I'll be around most of this evening -- let me know if there's any way a normal user can help out (editors whose posts need to be reverted, etc.). --MarkGall 19:24, 5 October 2009 (EDT)

Conservative Bible Project is the #59 ranked term on Google trends this hour, any help would be appreciated.--Jpatt 19:35, 5 October 2009 (EDT)


Thanks for fixing that. I missed the recreate option. DouglasA 21:09, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

Sadly gay

The reason Rev. Moon is against homosexuality is not so much that "God has forbidden it" but that it's a lifestyle that makes you miserable. The Bible says "Outside the city are the fornicators" not because some angel stands by the gate like a bouncer, but because fornication pulls us away from God.

They don't want to hear this message, so they attack the messenger. Too bad, because along with the diagnosis the doctor also has a cure in mind. --Ed Poor Talk 13:47, 9 October 2009 (EDT)


Will be our next choice, so any improvement is urgent. --Joaquín Martínez 21:14, 10 October 2009 (EDT)

For you, no problem Joaquín.--Jpatt 00:34, 11 October 2009 (EDT)

Christopher Columbus

You reverted the change I made on the Christopher Columbus article. If you follow the link for the picture of the ship in the section marked "Third Voyage", you'll see that it is a recreation of the Santa Maria, not a ship called the Isabbella. Thanks, SharonW

Thanks. It was my first edit here (I'm not very adventurous!) and I was a little bummed when you reverted it.


RafiqR is my friend from school. That is his first name and last initial. he emailed me to say he was blocked by you. Can you please unblock him? -- --Cambrian 22:54, 15 October 2009 (EDT) Thank you Jpatt. We're not sure we really need accounts because we're just using Conservapedia resources for a class but don't want to get in trouble here. Thanks again. Cambrian 23:11, 15 October 2009 (EDT)

Great block

Great block this evening! The Bible and Christianity really seems to bring out the bad guys. I guess that's been true for 2000 years!

By the way, has "Cambrian" explained his name? It looks suspect to me, though the edits by him that I've seen seem fine.--Andy Schlafly 23:34, 17 October 2009 (EDT)

Zero contributions since, either user. I will get additional details. --Jpatt 00:44, 18 October 2009 (EDT)

Any Wonder?

Pages are targeted by unauthorized bots. --Jpatt 01:22, 18 October 2009 (EDT)


I'm sorry, but why on earth have you moved Rush Limbaugh to Conservapedia's Law, and removed the apostrophe from the article's title? DouglasA 00:09, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

I have discussed this at length per, check your email. --Jpatt 00:17, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Jim Cramer

Thanks for the uploaded Jim Cramer image! Much appreciated. DerekE 13:40, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Thank you for making such high quality improvements. --Jpatt 13:57, 22 October 2009 (EDT)


Hey man, you should bring that one back. I know it wasn't a top-notch article, but nothing is after its first go. Besides, wasn't that picture freakin' hysterical? Its important that someone throw that picture up on this site somewhere. --ThomasGret 22:03, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Stupid question ...

Is there any page that lists how many edits you've completed? Not just the "my contributions" tag, the total number of edits? Found it. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:06, 27 October 2009 (EDT)

Name blocks

Asking theoretically, if I was to be blocked, how would you use my name? RandolfH 22:50, 30 October 2009 (EDT)

We will retire your name, theoretically. First name and last initial is not set in stone and RandolfH2 would suffice. --Jpatt 22:54, 30 October 2009 (EDT)


Dear friend

Evan Williams co-founded Pyra Labs, which developed Blogger software for blogging, eventually sold to Google. [4]

--Joaquín Martínez 17:52, 2 November 2009 (EST)

My mistake, thank Joaquín --Jpatt 17:58, 2 November 2009 (EST)


You recently blocked me for 'too many reverts'. However, I had, and up to this moment in time, have, only reverted once on Conservapedia. So I was wondering how exactly it could be said that this was too many? DWiggins 08:59, 3 November 2009 (EST)

Your edits have been disruptive, please contribute in a responsible manner.--Jpatt 09:28, 3 November 2009 (EST)
Okay, first of all that was not the block reason, so I would kindly request that you answer the very reasonable question I have asked concerning the issue of the number of reverts. Secondly, may I ask in what way any of my edits have been disruptive? Simply because another user has misunderstood a concept does not mean I am in the wrong. DWiggins 10:07, 3 November 2009 (EST)
May I kindly reiterate my request for an answer? DWiggins 19:45, 5 November 2009 (EST)
I responded by email, maybe you didn't get it. I side with contributors here over the people who make just edits. The math project is important and you were disrupting a user that contributes. --Jpatt 19:52, 5 November 2009 (EST)


To be a RINO, one must be moderate or liberal overall. The article itself says "politicians who claim to be Republican but are in fact liberal, and therefore generally debase the winning conservative coalition base of the Republican Party." Hagel and Graham are hardly liberals; they merely disagree with conservatives on one issue each (Hagel especially). As Ronald Reagan said, "Your 80% friend is not your 20% enemy." And Reagan raised taxes; is he a RINO? ChuckR 18:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)

Sorry, it's not just one issue. --Jpatt 18:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)
Mind giving sources then? Especially on Hagel. To my knowledge, he's only ever broke with Republicans on Iraq. His 2008 ACU score was 83.70; in 2007, it was 79. His lifetime rating is 84.67. ChuckR 22:28, 5 November 2009 (EST)
Hagel source- earmarks . The more I look at his record I am now rethinking his RINO status. --Jpatt 22:57, 5 November 2009 (EST)
Yeah, let me know what conclusion you come to. He's pretty conservative. ChuckR 18:33, 6 November 2009 (EST)

For your efforts and awesomeness...

I think user awards and barnstars are fun and cool. It's always nice to get an award or to receive some form of compliment from other people, especially when it's out of the blue and unexpected. You went out of your way to help me out, and I cannot thank you enough for it. So I posted this to my user page and want to present it to you ... just because!

This user supports Jpatt as the rightful leader of Conservapedia.
DerekE 12:54, 6 November 2009 (EST)

Pshaw. Everyone knows that This guy is the rightful leader of Conservapedia! -- Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 12:57, 6 November 2009 (EST)
Haha... but when has JLauttamus gone out of his way to help me? Because there are no barnstars or other awards that I could give to Jpatt, I just picked the one that seemed to fit the closest. Jpatt rocks! If not for him I'd be stirring mud on Wikipedia, or in a dumpster somewhere on a useless website, longing for Conservapedia... DerekE 13:17, 6 November 2009 (EST)

Block question

Who can block a person's ability to email other users from here? I don't see that option available to me now (Andy gave me blocking rights only to help out with the Colbert zombies) and I don't remember if I had it when I was a siteadmin. Just curious. Jinx McHue 22:34, 13 November 2009 (EST)


Hi Jpatt,

Since Andy has his talk page locked, I will ask you my question. What makes you so sure your religion is right? I mean, if you had been born in a country where Christianity is a minority religion, I'm sure you would not be Christian. How, then, can you be so sure that your religion is right when choosing a religion is largely a function of what you grew up believing. If you are indoctrinated at an early age, it is nearly impossible to change your beliefs. Thanks. LindseyE 22:50, 13 November 2009 (EST)

I noticed you didn't make it here past 24 hours. I will leave your good question for others. As for my religion being right and somebody else religion wrong, I don't see it that way. The three biggest religions practiced by much of the world-- all have the same God. Since we are all flawed individuals, getting life just right seems out of reach. You believe in one true God or you are an apostate. I heard that even as an apostate, a humble confession on your death bed may grant you purgatory (final stop, Heaven guaranteed) through his unknowing Mercy.
One percent of America is bonafide atheist. It takes some ego and some will power to fight the truth that 99% of America disagrees with atheist logic. That is tough, so much so, atheists have to battle daily to keep all that is good from seeping into their minds. By the way, the mind was built for knowledge. All that is good comes from God, because of God. The light of knowledge of the Lord is not placed underneath the table where it cannot shine. It is placed on top of the table for all to see. --Jpatt 16:04, 14 November 2009 (EST)

math templates

I'm really sorry to bother you with this, but I've just discovered some simple grammatical errors in the math level templates

{{Template:Math-e}} {{Template:Math-m}} {{Template:Math-a}}

Could you please unlock them for me? (Or change "concept" to "concepts"?) I have to admit to being more of a nuisance about this than I should be, because Andy unlocked them for me a few weeks ago, and I didn't catch these errors. But his talk page is locked.

By the way, speaking of bothering you, I may want you to indulge me for some more image uploads by email.

Thanks a lot. PatrickD 16:19, 14 November 2009 (EST)

Done. No problem with email pics.--Jpatt 16:23, 14 November 2009 (EST)


(Sorry. Couldn't resist.)

I see you repeatedly dealing with the trolls/vandals and I realize it's a pain in the butt, so I just wanted to pass on a word of encouragement to you. Your dedication is valued and appreciated by everyone here.

"We also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us."

Jinx McHue 23:24, 17 November 2009 (EST)

Thanks Jinx. Liberals that post here are like cockroaches. You hate to see them but you never let them go free, you stomp on them. They'll post nonsense and I'll revert, ohhh the humanity. This plays over and over yet, we are growing and they can't stop us no matter what childish pranks they pull.--Jpatt 23:29, 17 November 2009 (EST)

Jpatt is the man! Without him, Conservapedia wouldn't be the same; I take comfort knowing there are people like Jpatt editing and helping in the same community that I enjoy so much. Glad to see others feel the same way I do! DerekE



I am deeply disappointed in your characterization of KSorenson's posting as "childish". None of her behavior here has been the least bit childish.

I have had a number of email communications with you, and I know that you are a gentleman, and that that kind of characterization of other people is not the way you think, at least in private communications.

PatrickD 00:07, 18 November 2009 (EST)

I am sorry to see you go, hopefully you'll change your mind. What is so special about KSorenson? She left a parting shot, she said she was retiring. I wasn't going to let her comment about Larry Johnson and her characterization of ASchlafly stay on her page. The critics said two years ago that we are finished. Yet we are still here bigger than ever. I respect both you and Mark but will not lose any sleep that you dissatisfied. We have had good people come and go. This will not change. --Jpatt 00:23, 18 November 2009 (EST)

John: You are forgetting something. Please read your email message from me a few days ago. There's something you need to do. You know what it is, and why I am not going into details in public. I'm trying to help, or at least do no harm. PatrickD 17:09, 22 November 2009 (EST)

I figured out what was being referred to. It wasn't hard, I just looked a few sections up on this page. I've made the changes, and left edit comments requesting a re-protect. So now someone will surely fix that. Patrick was apparently trying to fix a (minor) security breach. Was that what the email was about?
But why did you block him and delete his pages? "Hopefully you'll change your mind"? Huh? Do you want him back, or not?
SaraT 08:49, 23 November 2009 (EST)
I didn't block him. He was a contributor that deserves to come back if he corrects his view of this project.--Jpatt 19:00, 23 November 2009 (EST)


Can you explain me how to write on conservapedia?--LeonardoMargiotta 10:15, 20 November 2009 (EST)

Sure, can you add Rome information and photos. --Jpatt 10:30, 20 November 2009 (EST)

Great headline!

Your "happy birthday Conservapedia" headline is very much appreciated! Well done!!!--Andy Schlafly 01:04, 21 November 2009 (EST)

I think Joaquín did something similar last year, he is on vacation. Andy I can't thank you enough. I estimate 3-years from now-- 400 million page views! --Jpatt 01:25, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Welcome to Conservapedia banner

Hi Jpatt, I noticed in the mainpageright template there's a "Welcome to Conservapedia" banner, which can also been seen when viewing the source; however, when I go to the main page as well as its source the banner is no longer showing. I think it's a great banner! It's somewhat in line with New Welcome Banner proposal that I brought up awhile ago, which I updated here:

Do you know if this is something still being considered? Thanks for the update in advance! DerekE 16:50, 21 November 2009 (EST)

Hi DerekE, yes I saw your template. I agree if this has benefits beyond appearance, such as SEO related, I would support. Big changes in appearance are typical a slow-go process. Upper management will let you know when a decision is made. Continue to tweak when you feel it is necessary.--Jpatt 19:00, 23 November 2009 (EST)
When I have some more time, I'll be sure and make more changes to it. No worries about the appearance change being a slow process, I understand such a change can take time. In terms of SEO, adding the banner would be one of many beneficial practices, the other important edit would be to the meta-description that shows up in Google results. But again, these are two practices from a list of many that goes into improvements for Search Engine Optimization - some of which Conservapedia cannot control and are influenced by external links from related, high-authority web sites linking to Conservapedia. There's a lot that goes into it, so this is just one of many changes that would benefit in the long-term. DerekE 20:07, 23 November 2009 (EST)

Reminded by your news headline

Have you ever read Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language"? It's an incredibly prescient attack on just that sort of thing - politicians modifying language to hide their intent. DouglasA 20:21, 23 November 2009 (EST)

Thanks, I'll look into it. Orwell seems to have seen the writing on the wall.--Jpatt 20:31, 23 November 2009 (EST)


I just wanted to thank you for sorting out that misunderstanding. DWiggins 11:16, 24 November 2009 (EST)


I think the term you're looking for is feticide, or alternately foeticide (deriving from the noun rather than the adjective). Is the term fetalcide used elsewhere? DouglasA 20:03, 24 November 2009 (EST)

Thanks, I'll add as a redirect. This is a part of the Personhood movement.

Thank you

Thank you for your warm welcome on my user page! Bless you, --FatherJoseph 20:40, 3 December 2009 (EST)

And another thank you for investigating my situation and allowing me to return to Conservapedia! I greatly appreciate your time and effort. --FatherJoseph 18:06, 9 December 2009 (EST)

"We don't use cite tags, we discuss on talk pages. Please do not delete content that doesn't fit your point-of-view.--Jpatt 17:31, 15 December 2009 (EST) " Yet you can put in and take out things that fit yours? Talk about your double standards. And it wasn't a matter of opinion, I was editing out the bias. How can this site claim to be trustworthy and open-minded, yet at the same time, only allow one point of view to be heard? This, is propaganda at its finest.--Jselin 00:22, 16 December 2009 (EST)

Thank you!

for the image uploads! I'd been waiting on those for a long time, very much appreciated! JacobB 16:29, 23 December 2009 (EST)