User talk:Karajou

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conservative (Talk | contribs) at 12:59, 22 May 2016. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Done. Many thanks! Wschact 11:31, 3 September 2013 (EDT)

== Carajouuu!!!! Your fave troll is back! Continuing since 2009

User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 15:01, 7 September 2013 (EDT)

Where is the flag (and coat of arms) of Jamaica and Kiribati? I cannot find it.--JoeyJ 09:39, 9 September 2013 (EDT)
There is also no Coat of Arms of the Comoros.--JoeyJ 03:28, 3 October 2013 (EDT)

Here is the actual list: Need Flaggs: Lesotho, Kiribati Need Coat of Arms: Lesotho, Guinea-Bissau, Republic of China, Benin, Saint Lucia, Ireland, Fiji, Jamaica, Kiribati, Comoros.--JoeyJ 14:24, 5 January 2014 (EST)

So please uploud them.--JoeyJ 07:00, 6 January 2014 (EST)
Then sorry.--JoeyJ 10:09, 7 January 2014 (EST)
You're OK. I think I forgot two of them. Karajou 21:11, 7 January 2014 (EST)

Here is an actual list of wanted Flags and/or Coat of Arms: Comoros, Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Monaco, San Marino, Liechtenstein and Tuvalu.--JoeyJ 15:19, 18 September 2014 (EDT)

So... Will you upload them?--JoeyJ 15:15, 15 November 2014 (EST) Karajou 16:17, 15 November 2014 (EST)



I made a new section at Talk:Obamacare#"Obamacare fines to be seized from bank accounts?" article is false. GregG 22:51, 8 October 2013 (EDT)


I've just reverted this idiocy of his as well. TBH he seems to be a bit of a parodist imo. Davidspencer 10:32, 20 October 2013 (EDT)

Thanks for reverting it. He's going to explain his edits if he wants to continue here. Karajou 10:45, 20 October 2013 (EDT)


Can you please uploud these pictures for me? [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] I already asked Ed Poor but he didnt answer.--JoeyJ 13:06, 29 October 2013 (EDT)

Use the InstantCommons. Dhdidnac 10:25, 8 January 2014 (EST)

Kathleen Sebellius deletion

I saw you removed the section about Kathleen Sebelius‎'s Nazi symbols on her clothes from her article. This was featured on the main page, should we not add it to her article? I have readded it but I will remove it if you can give a good reason why this information shouldn't be featured in the article.

Thanks, --PhilE 17:45, 10 November 2013 (EST)

First, you're just a troll. Period.
Second, the pin was identified as being "similar" to a Nazi symbol, but that doesn't make Sibelious a Nazi, does it?
Third, it's her actions that identify her as to who and what she is, and if she can deny a twelve year-old girl a liver transplant with the haughty phrase "some people live, and some people die", that would make her of the same ideology as a Nazi, wouldn't it? What she did confirms the death panel accusation that is part of Obamacare; it confirms an ideological link between her and some tenants of Nazism...and based on your own silly little postings past and present, "PhilE", it means you're just like her, aren't you? Just a typical racist, bigoted liberal. Karajou 17:55, 10 November 2013 (EST)

Happy Veterans' Day!

Happy Veterans' Day, Karajou! DMorris 22:14, 11 November 2013 (EST)


Please look at the Category:Speedy deletion candidates and delete some articles.--JoeyJ 07:56, 15 November 2013 (EST)

Please delete the article International Democratic Union.--JoeyJ 08:30, 17 November 2013 (EST)

USS Liberty

Please take a look at USS Liberty images. --Joaquín Martínez 13:19, 24 November 2013 (EST)


Hi, I'm a new user here. Since I don't want to go by my real name, is it okay if I keep the name Atum? I use it and variations of it on many other sites. If it's not good, please tell me. Thank you! Atum 23:02, 14 December 2013 (EST)

Picture needs fixing

Picture needs fixing: Visible in Chrome/Opera browsers. Not visible in Firefox. Conservative 00:27, 15 December 2013 (EST)


Hey Karajou - I was going through the president articles we have - and I was wondering if maybe you could find and upload a good picture for Ronald Reagan. I think the one we have at the top is fine for in-article, but if you look at any of the presidents after him or before, we use these very official photographs/portraits (George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama) - so I can't help but feel that Reagan's looks a little goofy.--IDuan 22:14, 20 December 2013 (EST)

Awesome - great finds.--IDuan 23:59, 20 December 2013 (EST)
I agree, nice picture finds of US presidents for their articles. --JohnJustice 11:24, 21 December 2013 (EST)

Qing dynasty

CMOS says to lower case "dynasty" (§8.71). "Qing dynasty" is actually given in the book as an example. CMOS isn't online, but Grammar Exchange has a discussion. So I was wondering if you could move Qing Dynasty to Qing dynasty. PeterKa 00:25, 8 January 2014 (EST)

Hey, thanks. Could you move Japanese Dance to Japanese dance? I don't know what the logic for capitalizing "dance" might be. PeterKa 14:50, 8 January 2014 (EST)
Thanks, again. PeterKa 11:08, 10 January 2014 (EST)

User templates

I was stalking people to figure out what to put on my user page and noticed the Navy template. Thanks for your service. I may steal "This user knows the Declaration of Independence was written and signed by right-wing extremests" eventually that's okay. I love it! JohnBD 00:12, 10 January 2014 (EST)

Thank you. You can access the complete index from Conservapedia:Userboxes. Karajou 06:55, 10 January 2014 (EST)


Hey Karajou! Long time no... type. Thanks for undeleting my pages. HelpJazz 10:01, 10 January 2014 (EST)

You're welcome...and welcome back! Karajou 10:59, 10 January 2014 (EST)

2 requests

I have two more requests, if you don't mind. Can you move dark ages to Dark Ages? When it refers to the period of European history, it should be capitalized, per Merriam Webster. Also, something needs to be done about {{bibleverse}}. The University of Sydney site isn't working any more. Wikipedia uses Bible Gateway, so perhaps we can switch to that site. In any case, it seems pointless to protect the template when it is not working. PeterKa 11:07, 10 January 2014 (EST)

I'll look into the Bibleverse template; perhaps it's something that should also be addressed to ASchlafly. As to the Dark Ages, it's corrected in a second... Karajou
Thanks. Could you also move Viet Cong to Vietcong, per Merriam-Webster? PeterKa 10:31, 11 January 2014 (EST)


Could you move Genus Homo to Homo? I don't see anyone else calling it "genus Homo." Homo is currently a redirect to Genus Homo. Both Britannica or Merriam-Webster give this classification as simply Homo. PeterKa 02:20, 15 January 2014 (EST)


Could you move Republic of Ireland to Ireland, and Ireland to Ireland (island)? I give my reasons here. The short version is that if you look up "Ireland" in Britannica and other reference works, you get an article that focuses on the modern state. PeterKa 04:20, 22 January 2014 (EST)

OK, but here's the thing. There has to be two separate articles on the governments of Ireland: the one for the republic, the other for Northern Ireland. The one you propose should be about the island as a whole, describing geography, people, etc. Karajou 09:37, 22 January 2014 (EST)
I see you've already moved it. But if someone objects that "Ireland" should be the island, I am fine with Ireland (state). My point is that the title "Republic of Ireland" is misleading. This is neither the common name nor the official name. PeterKa 11:00, 22 January 2014 (EST)
I was more concerned with the two particular governments on the island. But please do what you think is best. Karajou 11:22, 22 January 2014 (EST)

Chinese dynasties

I was going through the Chinese dynasties and I noticed that User:Wuhao1911 gave them incorrect, and sometimes ridiculous, Chinese character names back in 2009. He's already been blocked, so I guess there's not much you do about it at this point. PeterKa 04:33, 2 February 2014 (EST)

Please make any corrections as you see fit. Karajou 16:51, 2 February 2014 (EST)
  • I created People's Republic of China, which includes the material I trimmed earlier from History of China. The other historic eras already had their own articles, so I think it's logical. Of course PRC usually just means China. But someone who goes to the trouble of typing in all those extra letters is probably looking specifically for the PRC. PeterKa 05:21, 24 February 2014 (EST)

I have to edit via proxy.

My IP seems to be banned from even seeing the site. Any chance of fixing that? EddyJ 15:04, 1 March 2014 (EST)Coun

Requested Move: Great Library

Could you move Great Library to Library of Alexandria? I think this is what pretty much everyone calls it. See Britannica and Wikipedia. PeterKa 01:43, 16 March 2014 (EDT)

Excuse me, Sir.

What are some of the "unspoken rules" of this wiki? I just joined, and there doesn't seem to be a guide page, so I've decided to come to you, open of the site's well-loved sysops(and someone who presumably knows the ins-and-outs of conservapedia) and resident solider. Could you help me out a bit?

Sincerely, Patrick Anderson Ruargh! 21:17, 28 March 2014 (EDT)

Use this as a guide to writing articles; follow this page for overall conduct. Karajou 22:18, 28 March 2014 (EDT)

John Wilkes Booth

Why did you remove the category for conservatives on John Wilkes Booth?

Because he's not a conservative.

I thought he loved his country.

Booth's "country" was the Confederacy, a place run by Democrats; a place where Democrats enforced slavery, and created Jim Crow and segregation and the Ku Klux Klan after they lost the war. Booth supported slavery, and voted for those who enabled it. Karajou 22:37, 9 May 2014 (EDT)

5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated

Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself.

There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done:

1. De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages.

2. Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years. And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.

There is a list of editors/users here:

If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted.

You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: and

3. Delete the templates that are never being used.

4. Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words. Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles.

5. Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report:

Alternatively, using this Firefox tool or this chrome tool these dead links can be found.

I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles.

I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. Conservative 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)

Automating some of these tasks

I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like User:EdBot. Conservative 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)

Can you get in contact with Ed Poor to see if he can write some code to automate some of the maintenance tasks?

Can you get in contact with Ed Poor to see if he can write some code to automate some of the maintenance tasks? I believe he wrote the code for User:EdBot. Conservative 14:04, 20 June 2014 (EDT)


Okay, thanks for getting him. I was about to contact someone. Atum 23:51, 7 July 2014 (EDT)

Unprotect request

Could you unprotect Qin Shi Huang? PeterKa 06:32, 30 July 2014 (EDT)

Move request

Could you move Three Years of Disasters back to Great Leap Forward? This move was made by a user who was blocked years ago.[8] PeterKa 23:34, 2 August 2014 (EDT)


You have reverted some edits I made. You obviously know what you're doing, but are you actually supposed to revert edits made on talk pages? By which I mean, doesn't that take away the purpose of a page used to log everyone's suggestions on the accompanying article? I'm going to revert your reverts on the talk pages on the assumption that you weren't happy with my edits and only reverted my talk page comments automatically.--Monbuoy 21:15, 17 October 2014 (EDT)

Edit access during "off hours"

Hello Karajou. I wish to be able to edit between midnight and 7 AM Pacific Standard Time since I am free during those hours. Would you please unblock my editing ability during those hours? That is when I have the most free time. I sent an e-mail to, but with no reply.

Thank you, God bless. Jefferson Franklin TheAmericanRedoubt 11:06, 9 November 2014 (EST)

I agree, and I'll ask. Karajou 17:02, 9 November 2014 (EST)


Would you like to collaborate with other editors on a wiki project to help Conservapedia be a strong resource for a given topic.

The topic could be decided by the editors participating.

If you are interested, please go to: The collaborative project. Conservative 21:59, 25 December 2014 (EST)

The Liberals smear campaign Won -- I now retire from editing Conservapedia

I must say that the liberal smear campaign and relentless edits/deletions from 5 very loud CP liberal trolls / RINOs (besides the vociferous User:Wschact, you know who you are and will be happy to know you have won) has been no fun. I am sad to say, it is much worse edit wars and liberal reverts than anything I contributed over the years to Wikipedia. Sorry User:Aschlafly, User:Conservative, User:Karajou and User:Jpatt, but I have lost the enthusiasm to continue contributing to CP in the face of this much liberal opposition. Thank you 4 for what you do for the conservative movement. I strongly suspect that the frequent sock puppet hacker-vandalist accounts were User:Wschact or one his friends using a VPN since all the vandals edits were directed to things he was revert warring with me over. God bless. TheAmericanRedoubt 02:26, 9 January 2015 (EST)

Dear Karajou, feel free to contact me on my e-mail if you wish. You were the one who encouraged me to contribute articles:

"I also received advice from User:Karajou on Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:15:17 by e-mail (conservapedia AT who said, "Try your hand at writing complete articles. Conservapedia is not just something containing conservative thought; it is also intended to be a family encyclopedia, so it has to have info on planes, trains, automobiles, animals, sports teams, camera systems, or whatever else comes to mind. So, if you happen to be an expert on - say, rowboats - write an article on rowboats. Karajou". Thus, following Karajou's advice above and oversight from User:Conservative, I am writing "whatever comes to mind" on what I "happen to be an expert on". Thus, I have be developing a lot of detailed articles and their categorizations for my 6 areas of specialization (in order of my depth of subject matter expertise): 1. Medicine, 2. Computer networks (17 years professional experience), 3. Preparedness-Survivalism, 4. Firearms, 5. Permaculture gardening, 6. Radio communication technologies - Amateur radio. Being a staunch American conservative libertarian "prepper" "gun nut", I obviously write/edit from that perspective."

Sadly, I no longer have the enthusiasm to contribute in the face of such 'strong' opposition from 5 very vociferous liberal/RINO editors. It's more of an uphill battle than it was on Wikipedia, I am very disappointed to say. Godspeed in all you do.

Message posted to Wschact's talk page

TheAmericanRedoubt (TAR) creates a lot of content and his work is appreciated by the Admin community and has their full support. Wschact your content is appreciated also.

Second, I contacted TAR about various matters such as: not creating additional ayurvedic medicine articles at this time, avoiding creating large "see also" sections, avoiding creating a lot of red links (AlanE was irked by this), and not creating a lot of stub articles. TAR agreed to do all these things.

Third, Karajou, JPatt and I feel you are hounding TAR. This must immediately stop. Please cease and desist doing this. It is also suspected that you may have others using your account to help you hound TAR. If true, this is unacceptable.

Fourth, considering that TAR has agreed to not create additional ayurvedic medicine articles which seems to have been the spark to start this wiki war, you need to meet him half way and stop hounding him. If you don't Karajou, JPatt and I will consult with the owner of CP and make sure that you do stop hounding him.

Again, your content is appreciated and so is your input. Nonetheless, your behavior towards TAR must stop. It is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Conservative 09:36, 11 January 2015 (EST)

Temporary 7 Day Ban: WShact again removing Conservative POV material from Survival/Firearm Related Articles

Dear User:Jpatt and User:Karajou, I would appreciate your help on addressing Wshact issue again this since User:Conservative told me to talk to you since he is temporarily busy on off-Wiki related business. Thank you again.

Instead of contributing new material, I again have had to spend significant time restoring the diverse conservative point of view topics/materials that WShact continues to remove/delete/subtly edit out from Category:Survivalism and firearms, Second Amendment related articles. The Survival Blog articles in particular took 30 minutes to restore material deleted by Wshact from his numerous small edits (so they couldn't be easily reverted). I had to spend time removing Wshact's biased (and improperly formatted resulting in a reference error) source/ref from a biased competing commercial website rather than unbiased actual Alexa site reference. TheAmericanRedoubt 06:47, 13 January 2015 (EST)

In re-reviewing Wschact's continued harassment of Survivalism-Prepper-Firearms articles under the guise of making lots of small improvements to the article (which cannot be easily reverted). I realized Wshact, under the guise of reorganizing the article and putting it in the active voice instead of passive voice, has again deleted significant conservative point of view content. It was to hard to continue trying to restore the vandalized article. Thus I had to restore my original version of the article.

Dealing with this whole affair of continued harassment has just cost me 1 hour of my time that I had budgeted to spend contributing new firearms content.

In response to Wshact's continued harassment despite repeated warnings, I am temporarily banning him for 7 days. Admins who have been involved in correcting Wshact's aggressive behavior, please correct the ban time if appropriate. TheAmericanRedoubt 07:11, 13 January 2015 (EST)

Comments from Others

Upload a picture "Send a gun to defend a British home.jpg"?

Hi Karajou. Being a fellow gun enthusiast and Oath Keeper, would you please examine this World War II flyer:

Perhaps, when you get a chance would please upload this picture to CP under the file name "Send a gun to defend a British home.jpg"? I would like to use it in both an article and an Pro Second Amendment essay such as Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists. Some of my essays (Conservapedia:Essays#Firearms_and_the_Second_Amendment) will be good conservative American Patriot "sheepdog" responses to AugustO and Wshacts deletion of Second Amendment, Tenth Amendment States' rights and other firearms related conservative content. Thanks.

TheAmericanRedoubt 09:38, 13 January 2015 (EST)

Regarding Firearms Articles and Need for Pictures

Over the next 12 months I will add at least 100 to 150 articles on firearms: User_talk:TheAmericanRedoubt#Guns_and_Knives Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Category_tag_compromise_and_TheAmericanRedoubt User_talk:Jpatt#Regarding_Firearms_Articles_and_Need_for_Pictures

Since from talking on the phone with User:Conservative it appears you too have some interest in firearms/military topics: I ask for your support please regarding picture uploading rights since I would be adding many pictures for firearms. Thanks for your support. TheAmericanRedoubt 15:43, 14 January 2015 (EST)

I left this message on AugustO's talk page in relation to his latest fight with TheAmericanRedoubt

I receive a report that you are blocking the good faith efforts of someone who wants to create content.

I think you are on your way to having your blocking rights removed. If that happens, a long block against you could last quite a long time. Due to my reduced activity level, I might not even notice if you are blocked for some time even if I was going to undo the block.

I have some projects I am tackling plus I expect to be tacking two more soon so I need to catch up on things. I had an accident happen to me recently and was temporarily injured which set me behind on things. But I recovered recently so I am moving forward. So I told the editor that I cannot referee this one and to refer the matter to Karajou. Try not to pick any unnecessary fights with other editors. That is my advice. Conservative 19:15, 15 January 2015 (EST)

Karajou could you look out for FFAF while Conservative is mostly away? I suggested this on AugustO's talk page:
This is indeed troubling. If FFAF is unduly blocked, Conservative may not notice due to time/commitments and having largely ridden off into the sunset like the Lone/Many Ranger(s). Then who will revert FFAF's unfair block? Perhaps one of the other admins should keep a particular eye out for FFAF being harassed or blocked. Incidentally, I have changed a section heading in Essay:Worst Liberal Movies. Somebody please check it; I believe it is an improvement as mentioned in Talk:Essay:Worst Liberal Movies. :)

ConsMovies 10:04, 20 January 2015 (EST)

Thanks for keeping FFAF safe while (most of) Conservative was/were away. I don't think we have to worry about FFAF now that he/she/they is/are (largely) back. Incidentally, I have added Robocop to the list of bad liberal films due to its demonizing of companies that take over public services, and poor taste. ConsMovies 20:33, 31 January 2015 (EST)


Lastnight I made an edit to the page on American State Legislators for Gun Violence Prevention. I was adding a list of members since this group is not publishing a membership roster, I was adding known members from their press release as well as those that had added their membership in their own bio. I think this information is important as people need to know who their legislators are colluding with, especially when done in secrecy to usurp upon individual rights. I have reviewed the commandments and cannot figure out why my additions were reverted. Thank you. Incepto 23:23, 29 January 2015 (PST)

i reviewed the link, which was the same entry for each individual, in addition to the fact that it's a dead link. Karajou 02:42, 30 January 2015 (EST)
I still have the link and it's to their press release hosted on scribd. Their press release has the first 8 public members. I have also found 3 more members -1 in WA & 2 NY with links to their legislative profiles .gov sites. May I repost with the updated information? Incepto 00:05, 30 January 2015 (PST)
Yes, post the current info. But if it's multiple people on one source, just post it as one link the end of the whole entry. Karajou 05:01, 30 January 2015 (EST)

Thank you

Many thanks for unblocking me. Again, I will state that I am not looking for trouble and want to be productive. However, we have all agreed upon a common framework (e.g., the Manual of Style) to come up with a consistent work product. So, when I edit an article (either from Recent Changes or from my own frame of logic (write a Dill article and then add links in all articles using that term)), I will do my best to bring any article I edit into compliance. I will do it even if it was a typo made by Andy,[9] or an inappropriate category by AugustO or an incorrectly capitalized "See also" by TAR. If I am misinterpreting the Manual of Style tell me, and I certainly do not want to "hound" anyone. I also try to give all editors space and will not hover over their every edit without allowing them time to correct and perfect their own work. We all do this because a more consistent product is better for our users.

By the way, could you please unlock Template:SuperBowl? Thanks, Wschact 15:42, 4 February 2015 (EST)

You're welcome. I'm agreed to what you said above, and will do what I can to work with you. Spelling and grammar errors you can correct anytime; the other stuff, like additional information and or deletions, just add a reasonable explanation on the talk page. TAR also understands about the categories, and he's going to exercise more care into using them. Karajou 02:03, 5 February 2015 (EST)
I am holding off on editing Apple Inc. and Wiki pending guidance from you. Thanks, Wschact 15:15, 5 February 2015 (EST)
I will use my best judgement on those. Thanks, Wschact 15:25, 7 February 2015 (EST)
Please take a look at the article Alex Barron. I believe that it was cut from a template, but the author only had time to write just the first sentence. For example the facebook and twitter external links are just _____. I respectuflly recommend that you move it to a user subpage of its author, so that he can have a chance to finish it when he gets back. We should encourage people to come up with a half-way decent article before moving it into the main article space. This one was too unfinished to be left in article space. Many thanks, Wschact 22:00, 8 February 2015 (EST)
I also have some unfinished articles that are more or less the same way, and I'm getting to them, albeit slowly (think of those silly owls!). Instead of moving it, we'll just leave a friendly reminder to TAR to finish it when he's able. Karajou 01:57, 9 February 2015 (EST)

Flags and Coat of Arms again...

Please upload [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] --JoeyJ 12:33, 10 February 2015 (EST)

Thank you.--JoeyJ 13:25, 11 February 2015 (EST)

Template edit request

Hi, I see that the Middle-earth template is locked for editing. I was wondering if you would be able to turn Aman into a wikilink in the template as I have created an article for the continent. It is in the third row, "geography". Thank you. ScottH35 15:11, 23 February 2015 (EST)

Done. Karajou 10:35, 25 February 2015 (EST)
Thank you ScottH35 18:38, 25 February 2015 (EST)


Hello. I have made this account for communicating with admins about my ban. I will not use the account for any other purpose.

The account that was banned was ConsMovies with a block id of #193504. It was banned by one of the users of the User:Conservative account, and I think I know which one. I think it was whichever one I politely disagreed with about halal meat on a talk page, and I think the ban is personal. The reason given for the ban was "desperate parodist" and seemed to immediately follow the addition of the movie Evolution to Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies.

I can see that a case could be made for the movie actually having no message, and me reading too much into it. In that case it could have been reverted and the reason why posted to the Essay Talk page. It doesn't seem like a reason to block a contributor with a history of constructive edits and revert almost everything they did.

Many edits were then reverted by this particular user of the User:Conservative account simply because they had my name attached to them.

Robocop for example. Anyone who doesn't think that my description of what is wrong with that film is accurate has obviously only seen the poster and not the actual movie. From the title and tagline it looks like harmless silly action but it is silly in a far less harmless way than that.

The user who reverted my edits even reverted my italicization of movie titles in Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies in line with the convention adopted by the rest of the article's table entries. What could he or she have against italics except for the presence of my name in the edit log?

Additionally, my addition to Mystery:Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist? was reverted. I can't see what problem anyone is supposed to have with the addition, other than my name on the edit log.

As you can see my ban was personal and nothing to do with proper running of the encyclopedia. I waited to see if the other users of the User:Conservative account would have a word with the errant one but they remain silent! Clearly they are a tight-knit group, and while that is not a bad thing in itself it should not take precedence over the correct running of Conservapedia.

ConsMoviesAppeal 11:03, 3 March 2015 (EST) (ConsMovies)

ConsMoviesAppeal, create 10 solid new articles that are at least 2,400 words in length to show good faith. The articles must be articles that need to be written for the Conservapedia atheism project.
Given your British IP address (a British atheist from London is obsessed with me) and your parodist type edits, I doubt you will take me up on this offer. Conservative 00:11, 4 March 2015 (EST)
How about an article about Lee Rigby, to include the political conditions in the UK which led to his murder. Karajou 06:14, 4 March 2015 (EST)
OK. I have reconsidered. If he does an article on Lee Rigby and creates 2 new articles for the Conservapedia atheism project of at least 2,400 words in length and are of good quality, he can edit Conservapedia for the foreseeable future barring any subsequent ill-behavior. This is my final offer and no counter offers will be accepted. Conservative 11:04, 4 March 2015 (EST)

Cquote - don't delete.

Karajou, Template:Cquote is listed in the Category:Speedy deletion candidates category for some unknown reason, and apparently no one intended to place it there either, so please don't delete it! I spoke with Conservative at Conservapedia:Community Portal, and he advised me to alert active admins. Thank you VargasMilan 20:52, 10 June 2015 (EDT)

User:DontCatchTehGay's block

Thank you.

Please block User:Sensational

I can't keep reverting because I am very busy - can you please block? JohnSelway (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2015 (EDT)

Hi Karajou, User:PeterK said you have uploaded images for him before and suggested I ask you to upload this image for the article I wroteon John Key - - thanks in advance! JohnSelway (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2015 (EDT)

It is nice to see that the birdman of Conservapedia is back

It is nice to see that the birdman of Conservapedia is back!

Welcome back. Conservative (talk) 13:07, 6 November 2015 (EST)

re: Freedom From Atheism Foundation


I am in the midst of finding out if StanM was a representative of the Freedom From Atheism Foundation. For now, please leave the talk page undeleted. Conservative (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2015 (EST)

Deletion Discussion

Good day, I was a little confused about the speedy deletion for the page I created. Can you please let me know what you felt was a copyright violation? I had sourced everything to third party references, so would like to discuss. If need be, I am willing to re-work the article to meet any concerns if I could have the electrons back. Kind Regards.--Dual Freq (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2015 (EST)

The article was copied from Wikipedia, and I found similar material on a number of other sites. If you want, re-do it, but write it up in your own words. Karajou (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2015 (EST)
I am the Wikipedia author. Several other sites might have mirrored it, but I cannot help that. If you disagree with my writing, I am more than willing to change from my original words to suit whatever requirement you have though. If you cannot still accept my original writing and references, may I have the electrons back from you so I can rewrite as I no longer have due to the unanticipated deletion? My goal is to improve the article to whatever standard you have. Yours in Christ, --Dual Freq (talk)
You can upload it here as the original author, but you may have to change or discard the templates. Feel free to bring it back, and make any changes you think are necessary. Karajou (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2015 (EST)
Thank-you sir, unfortunately, I do not have the electrons. Can I please have them back? My understanding is admin can view/release the electrons back and/or restore previously deleted pages. I apologize if I wasn't clearer the first time. Appreciate any help you can give to get me the draft I submitted returned.--Dual Freq (talk) 13:56, 11 December 2015 (EST)
Page restored, with a minor correction as to title. Karajou (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2015 (EST)


I have a 350-400 word article ready to go on the 1827 Battle of Navarino but can't get past an ancient "Learn together" redirect. I'd appreciate a clear field of fire. AlanE (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2016 (EST)

Thanks K. Done, for what it's worth. AlanE (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2016 (EST)

re: Anthony Weiner article and also the issue of fighting between User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano

TO: User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano

As far as the Anthony Weiner article, I will admit that the term "gun grabbing" is not encyclopedic. Strong advocate of gun control or similar phraseology would be more appropriate. It is not appropriate to remove all references to his policy on guns.

Second, making a big deal about his Jewish religion in the first 7 words of an article is not appropriate either. However, totally removing all references to his religion is not helpful either. While I am not a fan of Wikipedia, they typically list a politician's religious persuasion (Baptist, Presbyterian, Jewish, Muslim, atheist, etc.). I do think giving this information is helpful to readers.

User: JDano and User: TheAmericanRedoubt need to work more cooperatively.

Due to time constraints, I am asking User: Karajou and the owner of this website to referee if necessary. I sincerely hope this is not necessary. You both seem to be intelligent individuals. Please start behaving more cooperatively. I know you are both capable of doing so. Conservative (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

I think User: The AmericanRedoubt quit being an editor of this wiki. I told him to review my last comment on his talk page and see if it changes his mind. If he does quit, make sure User: JDano doesn't remove all references to candidates being pro gun control (anti right to bear arms).
JDano says he is a conservative on this user page. I hope this is the case. I really haven't seen enough of his editing to confirm this matter. I am undecided at this point. He may be a conservative. I just don't know. Please see my comments above. Conservative (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
I will also say that User: Wsacht used to put on a veneer of politeness, but when you did a little more investigation, it became apparent it was merely a veneer. I hope User: JDano is not a sock of User: Wsacht. Conservative (talk) 11:22, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
I am a bit hurt that you would say these things, and the response that I left for User:Conservative on my own talk page did not address them because it was not raised with me there. I think that there no tension between being a true conservative and being an effective and persuasive writer. Take the Anthony Weiner article as an example. Here is someone who resigned from Congress and dropped out of his race for NYC Mayor because of online sex scandals. That alone is a far more powerful message than whether he was in favor of gun control laws or happens to be Jewish. To pack all of that into the first sentences detracts from the overall article, and sounds like name calling. I do not object to expanding the article to include a discussion of Weiner's views on gun control or his religion, but it should not be given undue weight. If someone who has never heard of him reads the article, the basic message should be that his views on public policy issues do not matter because he lost all credibility after a series of sex scandals. I disagreed with him on a lot of things, but trying to list them all would just be a distraction. The important fact is his connection to Hilary Clinton, which is included in the article. Again, management should resolve things with User:TheAmericanRedoubt. Thank you. JDano (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
JDano, I am going to talk frankly. I think User: TheAmericanRedoubt (TAR) has a beef with Jews - especially those involved with banking or those of the liberal persuasion. Being a Christian, I do think the Jews are God's chosen people so I am not anti-semetic and I am pro-Israel. I haven't discussed with TAR views on Jewish people and I am not saying he is an anti-semite, but I am concerned about this matter. On the other hand, you edited out all reference to Weiner's religion with the edit comment of "religion not relevant". I have noticed that liberals have a tendency to censor information so I was a bit concerned that you might be Wsacht who was obsessed with TAR. And you do seem a bit obsessed with TAR. I was not happy about you deleting all references to his policy on guns either.
JDano, I really have a very limited amount of information about you. I haven't looked at a lot of your edits. There is no need to be offended.
I just tried to mediate the situation with very limited information. Conservative (talk) 12:13, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

Important template is too big and it needs fixing

It is best not to flood pages with a mass of internal links - especially red links. Yet this template is a big mass of links (including red links) and it has the term "gun grabber" on it. I told the creator of the template this "gun grabber" was not an encyclopedic term.

The template is too big. For example, a pro-second amendment template doesn't need an "invest in tangibles" link on it.

I wish I had the time to fix it, but I don't. Conservative (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

a new second amendment template will need to be created

A new second amendment template will need to be created.

Here are the pages that link to the old second amendment template:

Just thought I would let you know. Conservative (talk) 12:03, 2 April 2016 (EDT)

Do you really want Molon labe left in there. Is it that common a phrase, or is it more a Greek history topic? Thanks, JDano (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
"Molon Labe" is both a modern, common phrase and a Greek history topic, first said in ancient times by the king of Sparta to the Persians when they demanded his surrender. You are probably correct in thinking that the phrase should be left out of the Second Amendment template, as it has more to do with inalienable rights in general than specific gun rights. Karajou (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2016 (EDT)
I will take it out for now. We also have confusion because Molon Labe! is the title of a book as well. JDano (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2016 (EDT)

I put this notice up at User: RobSmith's talk page


I put this note on User: RobSmith's talk page


You wrote: "Accept my terms for returning...". I already recommended to the owner of CP that you be made a Sysop again. I set up the ball in front of net, now it's your job to spoke it over the net.

There is really nothing for me to accept. Only the owner of CP can reinstate your Sysop rights. Get in contact with the owner of CP and hammer something out.

I also suggest contacting Karajou. You want him to be for it and not against it.

I wish you the best in getting back your Sysop rights.

If you hit a wall when asking for your Sysop rights back, I suggest building up some goodwill with some new content at CP and then asking again. If necessary (and I don't think it would be necessary), keep repeating this cycle until your are a Sysop.

I really think it would be easy for your to get your Sysop rights again. You just need to put a little effort into it. Andy liked your content so I am confident things would work out."

Karajou, I something should be worked out with RobSmith. It seems like a win-win situation to me. Conservative (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2016 (EDT)

re: I posted this message to RobSmith

I posted this message to User: RobSmith:

I do think it is possible that you could reestablish a working relationship with User: Karajou. Not sure how fast this would happen, but I think it is doable. Maybe he could post stories that you find to the main page. Conservative (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2016 (EDT)

I don't need my work censored. I'm not gonna wait and beg for uploads when I need it done. RobS Pat Nixon for President 18:52, 21 May 2016 (EDT)
I think it is doable, and Rob should not have to wait and beg for anything...which means I support his gaining sysop.Karajou (talk) 05:32, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
Thank you Karajou. And again, I apologize for my off-wiki sarcasm. I feel the time is short to the conventions, there is much interest in Hillary Clinton, but I can not get any help or cooperation from User:Conservative who consistently undermines my work and refuses to engage in constructive dialogue and editing of mainspace (the way me & TK did to create the outdated Hillary Clinton article that exists now). All he needs to do is backoff and let me work. RobS aka Nobs01Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware! 13:11, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
I think RobS being a admin again is a long shot at this point. He no longer has someone patiently lobbying for it on his behalf. In addition, being an admin includes having access to the main page. RobS's penchant for using foul language, which he once again publicly displayed, means he is not a true conservative. Conservative (talk) 07:16, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
Yah well than Donald Trump isn't a true conservative than either, by your standards. Tell that to Phyllis and Andy on the mainpage, if you got any cahoonies (to use Sarah Palin's language), ok? RobS aka Nobs01Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware! 13:11, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
RobS, I never claimed Trump is a conservative. I merely take the position that he is better than Hillary Clinton. He does appear to lean right on a number of political issues though. Wit that being said, I have no desire to debate politics with you. Conservative (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2016 (EDT)

Karajou, if RobS continues to be an active editor again, he can revert the Hillary Rodham Clinton article and work with others to restore the Hillary Rodham Clinton article on a timely basis so the content is once again more robust.

If he ceases being an active editor, make sure RobS does not restore a skeletal version of the article out of spite and/or pride. I don't think it is a good idea to have a skeletal version of the article just before the 2016 presidential election.

As far as RobS being an admin again, I am not going to lobby for or against this matter. I take the position that RobS has his pros and cons and I am not sure if the pros outweigh the cons.

I don't think the owner of the website will restore the admin rights of an inactive editor or recently active editor who is a former editor/admin. If RobS, wants to be an admin again, it appears he will have to be an active editor again. For how long, I don't know. Conservative (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2016 (EDT)