User talk:Karajou

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EasternOrthodox (Talk | contribs) at 20:14, 4 May 2019. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search


Would you please add the fact that Trump won Maine's second congressional district to File:2016 US Electoral College Polling Map.png? Also, it's quite clear that Trump won Michigan, so would you please shade it completely red? --1990'sguy (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2016 (EST)

Also, the popular vote totals will need to be updated, even though the official results will not be released until December, most likely. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2016 (EST)
I'll get that done tomorrow. Are there any counts released of legal vs illegal votes? Karajou (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2016 (EST)
Over 3 million votes, it has been reported [1][2]. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2016 (EST)

Visibility request

Would you please change the visibility for this obscene edit? --1990'sguy (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (EST)

Your PZ Myers cartoon

Have you read the article Atheism and humor? Now you know why your PZ Myers cartoon was not well-received by certain atheists. :) Conservative (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2016 (EST)

First law of thermodynamics page

Please could you change the differentials from exact to inexact on the First Law of Thermodynamics page? PeterIceHockey (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2016 (EST)

Systematic English

Would you please delete the article Systematic English? Not to demean the article writer, but this article is of extremely poor quality. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2016 (EST)

Merry Christmas


Merry Christmas! And have a happy New Year's Day. Conservative (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)

Blocking account (without

Dear Karajou,

I Don't know why the account User:MrOakTree was blocked infinite, Spamming of external links to external links was the Reason, i have created a page about Mark Rutte with afding a link about his career on a Dutch website because sources is required.that's All , i did never vandalized One page, I created this account because you blocked the e mail also, you can block this also , Buf this was my question Master of Road (talk) 14:45, 4 January 2017 (EST)

Two requests

Hello Karajou,

--1990'sguy (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Thank you for unblocking Abortion. I have made my edits to that page. Because there is a high risk of vandalism on that article, would you please protect that article again? --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Speedy deletion candidates

Could you please delete the articles from the Category:Speedy deletion candidates? I don't have the permission to do it by myself, because the articles have a large edit history, over 3 revisions.--JoeyJ (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2017 (EST)

I apologize

The gods may throw a dice
Their minds as cold as ice
And someone way down here
Loses someone dear
The winner takes it all
The loser has to fall
It's simple and it's plain
Why should I complain?

I apologize
If it makes you feel bad
Seeing me so tense
No self-confidence.

Hey, even TR supported the notion of sterilizing some of God-RNG's children.[3]. God-RNG loves you. I promise.--Amorrow (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2017 (EST)


Hey, guy. I am Chemical Engineer from the oldest technology university in the Western Hemisphere. I understand the spiritual significance of entropy, I dunno, maybe I am in the top 1000 people on Earth who do. I dunno. Take some dramamine or something. Love ya.--Amorrow (talk) 12:26, 18 February 2017 (EST)

That is not an issue

  • With due respect, I do not bother if you deleted all three articles created by me per your neutrality. I hope, you did not demonstrate as a Wiki-admin. The Muslim United Nations is not a fake organisation as you follow the way of Wiki conspiracy, which is runs by secret agencies of that part of the world. I joined the Conservapedia for its credibility that differs from Wikipedia, I hope I am not mistaken about it. May I request you to restore the articles so that I can rewrite that as soon as possible, to satisfy you that have not the copyright issues, nor fake issues. Thanks. JusticeOfJustice (talk) 07:42, 25 February 2017 (EST)
No. Karajou (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Uncategorized files

We have a bit of an epidemic on our hands--there are a lot of uncatagorized files which are protected, so they cannot be taken care of. If you get a chance, is there a way you could un-protect at least a small bock so we can categorize them? I know it can be done one at a time, but can you do it in batch?
I have protect privileges (which don't work) but no unprotect privileges. Thank you! --David B (TALK) 20:13, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Madarasz's tiger parrot

Just wanted to thank you for your improvement to the article, Madarasz's tiger parrot.--IluvAviation (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Admin action request

Would you please hide this threatening edit? [4] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Impressive that you've earned a death threat from those fine, "tolerant" folks. I think I've only been sworn at. I'd say a hide is in order, but keep up the good work of frustrating vandals and trolls, 1990'sguy! --David B (TALK) 00:06, 4 March 2017 (EST)
He's just a little man; his threats revealed he's not even military, let alone a SEAL. Just some liberal whiner hanging out in his room all day, soiling his Fruit-of-the-Looms! Karajou (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2017 (EST)
I think Donald Trump's election, Trumpian news on the main page and my atheism content related edits, may have caused someone to fly into a rage.
The secular leftists are beginning to act like rats in a corner as I mentioned recently on the main page talk page. Others are turning to therapy (see: Report: Atheist Millennials Trade Faith for Therapy). Conservative (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2017 (EST)
Yes, that guy's words do show that he's not a Navy SEAL. They have too much honor to do stupid things like ranting and vandalizing CP. Still, I've never received a death threat in my life prior to this. Having a conservative like Trump in the White House really is revealing. It has shown which Republicans are actually conservative and which ones prefer leftist policies, and it has made clearer than ever how "tolerant" leftists are (even though it was quite clear to me before). --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2017 (EST)


Is there any way you could fix Template:Book so I can use it? The template is at the least not user-friendly. --1990'sguy (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (EST)

European range blocks

a /16 represents 64,000 ips. With the French elections in April, and German in September, and the fact European populist movements are thirsting for information because the mainstream media is demonizing them, and CP needs European editors to aprise us of actual facts versus our American fake news media, perhaps we should rethink the duration of such an extensive range block.

Obviously this trolling from Europe is targeted at shutting down Europeans access to information at a crucial time voters are deciding on the future of their sovereignty in the face of millions of Islamic hordes overruning Europe at the behest of EU elitists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 15:25, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

Agreed. I did that only to European data servers for no more than six months; I'll reduce it. Karajou (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Thanks. This'll be ongoing til the German elections in September. And the censorship and smearing over there is outrageous, worse than the US. Let's keep CP a breath of fresh air for European populists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 22:30, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Yes, and for the record, I strongly agree with RobS that we need to make this site as accessible as possible to European viewers, especially considering what's happening on the continent. Our elections are over for now, but theirs are taking place. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
What I'll do in the future is block specific IPs, without the range, and only if it's a persistant problem with a troll. Karajou (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Or shorten the range and duration of the block. I'd suggest try 24 hrs on a range; if that doesn't work, 36, 48, 72 and so on until you find on optimum duration that isn't a burden on yourself. And where hopefully the duration between abusive incidents is longer than a block. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 23:40, 25 March 2017 (EDT)


After some discussion (on my talk page and Andy's) it has been decided that I start an Internet Relay Chat channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know!
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --David B (TALK) 15:34, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

Block of Thekohser

Karajou, I'm reaching out to you to discuss why my User account here was blocked for "Trolling" in January 2016. I don't recall ever trolling this website, and I'm not even sure I had any edits to this site at the time of the block. I had a conversation this morning with the owner/founder of Conservapedia, and he quickly unblocked my account. I'm just curious what happened here, not trying to "poke" you. - Thekohser (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

I checked the logs for that time; I didn't block you at all. Karajou (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
That's weird, because when I tried to edit from that account name, the "notice" that came up for me clearly indicated that you had blocked the account. Maybe it's a system-admin default, or something? Are you like a "Steward" or "Bureaucrat" on Conservapedia, or does your name "auto-fill" on some forms with outdated contacts? Regardless, it's not that important. The record seems to show that a User:TK blocked my account within one day of me registering here -- unless that was a false-flag account that one of my detractors opened here to sabotage my reputation. Not surprisingly, in the following calendar year, TK was himself blocked from participation on Conservapedia. I seem to attract the attention of erratic individuals who have trouble conforming to rules. - Thekohser (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
It was possibly a false-flag, as you said. TK was the only individual involved in the original block, and that was several years ago. Karajou (talk) 11:52, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Karajou, this guy might be able to help us update the Wikipedia#Scandals_and_decline page, he made the chart on that page. Or even the Bias in WP page. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 12:07, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Just saw it; totally agree. Karajou (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

Hey there

Now, Karajou, let me first freely tell you that this account is a sock of Koidevelopment. That being said, don't block me on the sockery alone. I apologise for it, but I can't edit under my rightful account. Next, before you block because I'm Koidevelopment, I ask that you give me a chance and block if I deserve it, not because I'm me. Deserving it does not mean a different point of view on a subject. Deserving it does not mean that you don't personally like me. Deserving it means that I get blocked because I vandalise or blank pages or am hateful or I dox or something along those lines. Let me say it once and for all: I will never do any of those things, nor will I give you a reason to block me. I do think we could be friends. Let me stay, and let me simply edit articles that we have mutual dislike of. I don't like Islam and you don't like Islam, so let me stay to edit Islam. I know a bit about it (enough to improve it). You don't like Buddhism and I don't like Buddhism, so let me stay to edit it. See how this could be fun for both of us? I promise that I'll never edit a Christianity related article. Hold me to that promise. I actually do want to help you guys. Oh, and that Xiang Qi article? That was a legitimate one. It's quite a fun game, actually. You should try it. All the best, Li Wumei (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (EDT)

I'll even use American spelling when I edit, to sweeten the deal. Li Wumei (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Fair enough. I unblocked the Koidevelopment account if you want to use it again. Just be honest and factual in your edits. Karajou (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Look at thaatt. I do think this'll work. If I make a mistake, feel free to roll it back or fix it. Parrrley 12:22, 4 May 2017 (EDT)


Thank you for addressing the Philadelphia ambiguity. As an admin, I know that you have "page move powers". What I suggest is that you temporarily save the current Philadelphia page offline, delete the last two changes on Philadelphia to restore it to the state that it was in before you started the project, then move Philadelphia to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This will take the history with the text. Then recreate the Philadelphia article and paste in the saved text. We need to work to keep the history (which gets lost when you just copy and paste the text into an article.) Many thanks for all that you do for Conservapedia. JDano (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Already done :) Karajou (talk) 09:48, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Locking a template

Hey, if I'm not mistaken, you have the ability to lock pages. I'd like to ask you to lock this template:

Template:Old Testament Books

The template is complete, so I would propose locking it to avoid any vandalism that may come about in the future.Korvex (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Thanks for locking it, just noticed. Regards, Korvex (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Move requests

Would you please move Presidential Election 2012 and Presidential Election 2016 to United States presidential election, 2012 and United States presidential election, 2016, respectively? (you will need to delete the latter redirect to do so).

Andy prefers the current titles, but every other of the 56-or-so presidential election articles have the title of "United States presidential election, XXXX", so we need to be consistent in our article naming conventions. Of course, it would be great if we could find someone who is able and willing to move the 56-or-so other articles, but until that happens, we need to move these two for consistency. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Done. Karajou (talk) 09:44, 14 May 2017 (EDT)
I noticed that Andy responded to my concerns about these issues before I asked you -- I didn't see them until today. I still personally prefer consistency, but I submit his response for your consideration regardless. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

Page protect

Ought to just slap page protect on some of these targets. RobSTrump now is fighting back against the coup plotters 14:31, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Disgusting vandal

Would you please delete the edits of this vandal. This appears to be the same guy who posted that death threat on my talk page (and he did it again today). What he wrote in every article he edited this time is blatantly disgusting. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

I wouldn't be concerned about this little clown at all. What he did was to show off exactly what we've been saying about liberals for years, and the more people find out about it, the better. Karajou (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2017 (EDT)
I assume that I also shouldn't be concerned about the crazy man who seemingly has it out on me now? --Anglican (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
Report it to James Comey at the FBI. He's a man of unquestioned integrity who surely will nail the badguys. RobSLock Up The Coup Plotters! 13:49, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
That might by tricky, Rob. Somehow his office is hard to find now. Seriously, though, I don't want to sound callous, but don't take it personally. I think we all have gotten threats, insults, etc. 1990'sguy has recently been the recipient of a death threat (the same one twice, actually), and admins are regularly ridiculed. When he comes around, we'll deal with him. Unfortunately, tunneling network connections has become incredibly easy, so fools like him don't need to understand how it works, they just click a button and become instantly able to access the site under a different IP. He'll run out of IPs and interest eventually, like they all do. Of course, talking about him just validates his efforts and probably encourages him. I suppose that can't be helped. --David B (TALK) 14:29, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
Funny, that's never worked for me. I never figured out how to work a dynamic IP, and I've only got the one Internet connection until school starts again.--Nathan (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Nice going

Karajou - I feel you're not respected enough here on the Internet. Everyone interprets your toughness as meanness. I'm glad you put up with it - and of course, I've respected you for this. A few months ago, I was doing history homework and used that article. I may have been the only person to use this site for research during this administration, and may stay that way, but you made that possible.--Nathan (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

You can play suck-up somewhere else. By your own admission, you chose to come here as a liar and a vandal. I really don't care what sort of issues you have with relativity or any other science you seem to have no knowledge of, but when you come here or anywhere else just to play liar and vandal, then it's all on your shoulders. We're not at fault; you are. Don't bother coming back. Karajou (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2017 (EDT)

JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the "travel ban" article.

I just posted this message to JDano's talk page:

"You are not allowed to edit the travel ban article anymore. I am imposing a Conservapedia:Topic ban on you for this article.

By the way, Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in terms of its Muslim population. The travel ban of the Trump administration does not include Indonesia."Conservative (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the fake news article

I posted this on JDano's talk page:

"The fake news article was locked/protected. It seems as if the root cause of the page being locked was an edit war involving yourself.

You are no longer allowed to edit the fake news article. I am imposing a Conservapedia topic ban on you for this article. See: Conservapedia:Topic ban

I hope additional topic bans are not imposed on you by people with block rights." Conservative (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

Request: Change username

After reading the rules, I want to change my username. 1990's guy told me bureaucrats can change usernames, and I was hoping if you could change mine to "Kenda". It's based on my real name, but not close enough that someone with ill intent could use it against me. --KommissarReb (talk) 9:25, 5 July 2017 (EDT)

You'll have to ask Aschlafly to make the change; he's the only bureaucrat on the site. Karajou (talk) 10:09, 5 July 2017 (EDT)

Ernst Rohm wanting permanent, continuous revolution source request.


I noticed that when you added in the history section and expanded on the unit with the Sturmabteilung article, you also added a tidbit about a known radical helming the SA, Ernst Rohm, and that he was, among other things, "an anti-Capitalist who wanted to gin up permanent, continuing revolution". I must ask, where did you get the source for that statement? It's actually interesting, because that actually sounds similar to what that scum Leon Trotsky advocated, which I even noted on various articles. Pokeria1 (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

The source is Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William L. Shirer, as well as various documentaries covering Hitler and the Long Knives incident. Karajou (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2017 (EDT)
Okay. I added the bit from Rise and Fall of the Third Reich in to the relevant articles. You're probably going to need to add in the Documentary sources, though, since... well, I don't actually know the names of the documentaries relating to the Night of the Long Knives and their connection to Hitler, and I can't just use as the source material "various documentaries covering Hitler and the Long Knives incident." Pokeria1 (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
This is a warning Rohm gave in June, 1933 about the continuance of the Nazi revolution; Rohm had at that time gloated over the fact that his SA numbered some 20 times more men than the regular army (2,000,000 vs 100,000), and there was talk of defeating elements of the right (business, finance, aristocracy, Junkers, Prussian generals, etc):
"A tremendous victory has been won. But not an absolute victory! The SA and the SS will not tolerate the German revolution going to sleep and being betrayed at the half-way stage by non-combatants. Not for the sake of the SA and SS but for Germany's sake. For the SA is the last armed force of the nation, the last defense against communism. If the German revolution is wrecked by the reactionary opposition, incompetence, or laziness, the German people will fall into despair and will be an easy prey for the bloodstained frenzy coming from the depths of Asia. If these bourgeois simpletons think that the national revolution has already lasted too long, for once we agree with them. It is in fact high time the national revolution stopped and became the National Socialist one. Whether they like it or not, we will continue our struggle - if they understand at last what it is about - with them; if they are unwilling - without them; and if necessary - against them."[5]
William Shirer goes into detail of this in his Rise and Fall of the Third Reich chapter "The Nazification of Germany: 1933-34; 'No Second Revolution'" beginning on page 204. Karajou (talk) 07:20, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
Heh, for a guy who wants to stop Soviet communism, Rohm's certainly sounding a lot like that dirtbag Leon Trotsky with that talk. I wonder if he was meant to be Germany's equivalent to Trotsky. Anyways, I'll make sure to note that chapter and page number, as well as the quote, in further edits. Since you know far more about the documentaries than I do, like I said earlier, I'll let you take care of them. Pokeria1 (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2017 (EDT)

Vandalism delete request

Please delete the article "Dildo", which was created by a vandal (unless someone else does it first). I cannot add the speedy deletion tag to it because my university's server is not letting me access the page due to the inappropriate title. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2017 (EDT)

Edit request

Hello Karajou, would you please add these links to the "See also" section of the Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism article?

--1990'sguy (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

Christianity has always.... edit

That entry while you may believe it and maybe it is true, has no bias for empirical truth. It has nothing to back it up and is therefore grossly misleading. Gloern (talk) 02:28, 23 September 2017 (EDT)

So eternal life as given by God via Jesus doesn't exist? Karajou (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2017 (EDT)

Night Sky template

The new template looks good. There are a couple of problems, mainly extra brackets appearing on some pages. I've left details on the talk page. Definitely an improvement though. FredericBernard (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2018 (EST)

That "crowdfunding the wall" troll is back

This time as "JoH." I've already looked up the question he keeps asking (and I'm sure you have too), Mexico has so far resisted attempt to be made to pay for the wall, so Diane Black proposed crowdfunding to pay for it. He needs to just look it up. It's not that hard to find out. Shobson20 (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2018 (EDT)

He's nothing. Just a young adult who still can't get over that his Sit-N-Spin toy broke at the age of seven. Karajou (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
The problem isn't Mexico refusing to pay -- Congress could easily squeeze the necessary funds out of them through several different ways if it wanted to. However, Congress doesn't want to force Mexico to pay -- they're still stuck in the old way of thinking that says the country is a good friend of America and we must continue to appease it because of that. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2018 (EDT)

He's made another Sock called "HarryDS" Shobson20 (talk) 09:43, 2 July 2018 (EDT)

And he's still nothing, as demonstrated time and time again. Karajou (talk) 09:52, 2 July 2018 (EDT)

New Essay Idea

I think, as a counter to feminism, that there needs to be an essay showing how conservatism "empowers" women more than feminism by listing women whom I find to be far stronger-willed than feminists. I'd start with Andy's mother, of course, then I'd also mention other conservative women like the NRA's Dana Loesch and Jeanine Pirro, the Fox News contributor who's unafraid to call out Liberal Hypocrisy and the Left-wing war on women. Is this appropriate? Shobson20 (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2018 (EDT)

By all means. At the very least, it can tell them that they are better off thinking for themselves, instead of playing the mindless drones that the liberal side of the fence wants them to be. Karajou (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2018 (EDT)

As to answering this troll named Joshua, you've already been told too many times you're not wanted here; you've been given multiple reasons why you're not wanted here. If you can't take those answers and process them in a normal manner, that's your problem. We don't owe you any further explanations. Have a nice day. Karajou (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2018 (EDT)

As an additional message to that idiot named Joshua, we've read your postings on that other site, and quite frankly you've shown your true colors. Telling someone on this website what they can do with themselves - with the F-word as emphasis - while you're trying to whine and beg about coming here merely gets the door shut in your face. Deal with it. Karajou (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2018 (EDT)
Are you "WWW" on that other site? Shobson20 (talk) 10:18, 24 July 2018 (EDT)
No comment  :) Karajou (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2018 (EDT)


Hi, Karajou; thanks for notifying me about my errors. I believe I've fixed them now. —Fëalórin, A Child of Him Whose Love Never Fails 20:06, 8 August 2018 (EDT)


With all due respect, why did you revert my edits to the Buddhism article? I've been Buddhist for about 35 years. I expect I know more about the subject than just about anyone else here. FredJ (talk) 18:11, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

Can you back up your own statement with proof you're a Buddhist? You put in three edits to that page; the first two was as if you inserted your own facts on the subject without a source, while the third was the insertion of a fact tag in the manner that someone else was needed to find a source for the statement in question.
So far the only consistent thing I've seen from you is an attraction to categories and arrogance, and I've seen it before in a user who called himself Abcqwe. This is an encyclopedia, and not some site where a user can come in with an axe to grind. Karajou (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
I don't believe there is a way to prove one is a Buddhist. We don't have baptismal certificates or such. We have only our practice and our sincere commitment to the precepts, including, for me, "Manifest truth; Do not lie."
There's no such thing as anyone's "own facts"; there are only FACTS (that is, outside of Trumpworld with its "alternative facts"). I began with the intention to improve the woeful state of your current Buddhism-related articles, but was met with resistance right away. If I choose to continue to try to improve the information about Buddhism here, I will provide sources for everything. Strangely, you don't seem concerned with the lack of support for what is already present in the articles. I take it that it is customary here for "acceptable" writers to put in whatever they want without evidentiary support, while those who question that content are required to search for & find the sources that should have been provided in the first place. Fine, but that is quite the opposite of how things work in the real world.
Yes, I took it upon myself to try to clean up the horrible state of categorisation on this site. Sorry. I won't try to help again. May this site happily wallow in its awfulness. It would be proper, however, for you to provide some examples of my "arrogance" and whatever "axe to grind" you think I've shown, but I have no expectation that you actually will do so. FredJ (talk) 23:20, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
You have abandoned a cardinal precept which you claimed you adhere to within the very correspondence in which it appears! Conservapedia is not awful; it is faithful to the created spiritual reality that Sacred Scripture presents. The carnal-minded man or woman thinks worldly pursuits are his or her only concern, while the spiritual man or woman seeks the Kingdom of Heaven and the practice of doing what it requires.
I can't take your correspondence seriously; your only effect is that of trying to mock Conservapedia by mis-describing it within the context of your own practice of self-contradiction.
Just as SamHB has "assisted" you by agreeing with your cynical viewpoint, I am helping Karajou, being familiar with this type of detraction with which you are trying to disrupt Conservapedia.
If you think you are going to "relax" in your armchair, as you put it, and criticize Conservapedia for not living up to moral standards that you simply renounce to begin with, you'd better think again, since who would tolerate such a thing? VargasMilan (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

FredJ, or whoever you are, you proved your arrogance by your reply here; you proved you're a liar by your petty edits in a few articles since. I hardly think Buddhism teaches you to do both. Have a nice day. Karajou (talk) 02:56, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

Is there any article about Atheists' biblical ignorance?

There ought to be. If you've seen the way Atheists misrepresent the Bible, you know how bad their knowledge is. One of the most common claims is that Christians "ignore" Leviticus and Deuteronomy because we don't follow those old Jewish laws. Even Richard Dawkins uses this bad argument, despite the fact that I can find tons of resources that explain why:

A) The Jewish ceremonial laws never applied to the Gentiles and

B) Even the Jews are no longer under the law

Another one is God being "genocidal" for wiping out the Canaanites and leaving out the fact that they were an evil Pagan cult that sacrificed their children to their false god Molech. Most of their attacks on God have to do with:

A) Taking Bible verses out of context and omitting information critical to understanding what is actually going on

B) Judging God for not conforming to their personal standards of what they think a God should be

Shobson20 (talk) 09:59, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

You might be interested in these articles, though I don't now if they're exactly what you're looking for:
--1990'sguy (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2018 (EDT)
I'm thinking of adding a section to Atheism and the Bible along the lines of "Common Atheist misunderstandings of the Bible" to address some of the issues discussed before. In main article space though, the rules are different, and I'm used to writing essays, So I'm not sure if I can make it fit the Manual of Style. Shobson20 (talk) 10:49, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

Collateral damage

Karajou: You got a military background. Would you be interested in starting a collateral damage article for us, since such notable domestic terrorists as Timothy McVeigh and Nancy Pelosi have caused the term to enter into mainstream political discourse? RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 14:50, 25 October 2018 (EDT)

I could try it. Karajou (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
Thanks. I'm thinking two basic sections, one how it originates as a military term, and two how it's seeped into mainstream usage by single-party socialists like Nancy Pelosi to express their agenda. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 20:16, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
The military definition is pretty much done; if you can think of something further or more detailed you're welcome to do so. I also thought of the political definition as well, and yes, it should go in too. Karajou (talk) 01:39, 27 Octlober 2018 (EDT)
,,Looks good. Thanks! RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 10:35, 27 October 2018 (EDT)


Why did you delete the page I am trying to create for columnist Ilana Mercer? I was editing a section and then all of a sudden ... gone? --KerryC 00:46, 20 November 2018 (EST)KerryC

For the record, the page had only two words: "Ilana Mercer." That's not encyclopedic. It must be a full article, and it should have sources. I recommend you read these pages -- you'll find them helpful: Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles, Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages --1990'sguy (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2018 (EST)
Sorry, Kerry. All I saw at the time was just two words. Please recreate it, without interruption from me. Karajou (talk) 01:49, 20 November 2018 (EST)

I need help from a senior admin

Could you hide the intermediate edits on the page Haskell, starting with the first one from "ihatehumans" until the current one from me? I thought it was vandalism, so I undid it, but then after realizing it was not vandalism, I undid my undoing, put then I noticed that it was copied from Wikipedia, so I undid it again. Since we shouldn't see any content copied from Wikipedia, I think it's appropriate to hide those edits. Shobson20 (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2018 (EST)

A Vandal called "JohnsonG" vandalized several pages so that they would show only black. I've fixed all those pages (though I had to go to the history page to do so). I would like you to hide all of those vandal revisions so that no one can see the black pages. Shobson20 (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2018 (EST)

Done. Karajou (talk) 00:48, 26 December 2018 (EST)

Would you please restore the pages Windows 2000 Professional and Windows longhorn? They were created by a sock, but both DavidB4 and I think they're worth keeping (and we both improved them before Cons deleted them). --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2018 (EST)

Windows 2000 Professional was just a redirect to Windows 2000, so it probably doesn't really matter whether or not it is restored. However, Windows longhorn had some valid content which I think is worth keeping. Thank you! --David B (TALK) 20:06, 27 December 2018 (EST)
Done.Conservative (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2018 (EST)

Someone put a death threat on Andy's talk page

A user named WBurton said something really bad on Andy's talk page. I've already undone the vandalism and blocked him, now I would appreciate it if a senior admin would hide the entry from the history. Shobson20 (talk) 15:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)

I wonder if he was a member of this website: Essay: The internet island of atheism that has been bypassed?
One thing that is almost certainly true, he was angered by the factually correct and well-cited work related to Atheism and animal abuse. When the death threat occurred, I was on a spree of creating material related to this topic.Conservative (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2019 (EST)

Strange Emails

I hvae been receiving emails from an MK who is informing me of some NJP on Conservapedia. This person claims that there is a protocol, NJ, and two conservapedia mods are in on it. Should I be worried, and what is he talking about? EasternOrthodox (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2019 (EST)

Nothing to worry about at all. Just a clown trying to get under your skin by sending you some bovine excrement from his land of make-believe. Karajou (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2019 (EST)

Japan map update

What seems to be a single-purpose account requested an update of your file File:Japan_location.png with one they apparently made. See: Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests#15_January_request.
Does this sound right to you? Thanks! --David B (TALK) 23:00, 28 February 2019 (EST)

If this request is the only reason he came in - and no other edits - then no. Karajou (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2019 (EST)

Other account blocked

Is it true that you blocked my other account for spamming links to external sites?--Myrtonos86 (talk) 19:43, 28 March 2019 (EDT)

Yes. Is there a problem? Karajou (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2019 (EDT)


I enjoy reading your contributions to various discussions. From my POV you're a clever guy (or girl? Sorry - I don't know which!). Cheers! JohnSelway (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

Marlene Dietrich

Why was my edit on her page reverted? (King Conservative (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)

Do you have a source for such a posting? In fact, do you have sources for anything you recently posted? The last time I looked, a pocket camera was something you could get at any Kmart and slip into your jeans, unless isle B catered to CIA and KGB agents only. Karajou (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
Come on, I asked first, also the pocket camera had NOTHING to do with the CIA or any other spies for the record, I honestly have ZERO idea where you get THAT idea from, lol. :P And to answer your question, my sources come from some wikis. (King Conservative (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)
And I have ZERO idea where you got both your nonsense edit to Marlene Dietrich, and your idea that pocket cameras are exclusively used by armed robbers. Are you engaged in parody here? Karajou (talk) 04:41, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
No, I am not. (King Conservative (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)

Website called Christopedia

Were you an editor on a site with this name? EasternOrthodox (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2019 (EDT)