User talk:Karajou

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carltonio (Talk | contribs) at 16:38, 28 September 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search



Would you please add the fact that Trump won Maine's second congressional district to File:2016 US Electoral College Polling Map.png? Also, it's quite clear that Trump won Michigan, so would you please shade it completely red? --1990'sguy (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2016 (EST)

Also, the popular vote totals will need to be updated, even though the official results will not be released until December, most likely. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2016 (EST)
I'll get that done tomorrow. Are there any counts released of legal vs illegal votes? Karajou (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2016 (EST)
Over 3 million votes, it has been reported [1][2]. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2016 (EST)

Visibility request

Would you please change the visibility for this obscene edit? --1990'sguy (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (EST)

Your PZ Myers cartoon

Have you read the article Atheism and humor? Now you know why your PZ Myers cartoon was not well-received by certain atheists. :) Conservative (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2016 (EST)

First law of thermodynamics page

Please could you change the differentials from exact to inexact on the First Law of Thermodynamics page? PeterIceHockey (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2016 (EST)

Systematic English

Would you please delete the article Systematic English? Not to demean the article writer, but this article is of extremely poor quality. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2016 (EST)

Merry Christmas


Merry Christmas! And have a happy New Year's Day. Conservative (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)

Blocking account (without

Dear Karajou,

I Don't know why the account User:MrOakTree was blocked infinite, Spamming of external links to external links was the Reason, i have created a page about Mark Rutte with afding a link about his career on a Dutch website because sources is required.that's All , i did never vandalized One page, I created this account because you blocked the e mail also, you can block this also , Buf this was my question Master of Road (talk) 14:45, 4 January 2017 (EST)

Two requests

Hello Karajou,

--1990'sguy (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Thank you for unblocking Abortion. I have made my edits to that page. Because there is a high risk of vandalism on that article, would you please protect that article again? --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2017 (EST)

Speedy deletion candidates

Could you please delete the articles from the Category:Speedy deletion candidates? I don't have the permission to do it by myself, because the articles have a large edit history, over 3 revisions.--JoeyJ (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2017 (EST)

I apologize

The gods may throw a dice
Their minds as cold as ice
And someone way down here
Loses someone dear
The winner takes it all
The loser has to fall
It's simple and it's plain
Why should I complain?

I apologize
If it makes you feel bad
Seeing me so tense
No self-confidence.

Hey, even TR supported the notion of sterilizing some of God-RNG's children.[3]. God-RNG loves you. I promise.--Amorrow (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2017 (EST)

This song is copyrighted. Fire$hark (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2019 (EDT)
Copyrighted? That would be like trying to patent a turd. These alleged "lyrics" are anything but musical, let alone poetic. RobSDe Plorabus Unum


Hey, guy. I am Chemical Engineer from the oldest technology university in the Western Hemisphere. I understand the spiritual significance of entropy, I dunno, maybe I am in the top 1000 people on Earth who do. I dunno. Take some dramamine or something. Love ya.--Amorrow (talk) 12:26, 18 February 2017 (EST)

That is not an issue

  • With due respect, I do not bother if you deleted all three articles created by me per your neutrality. I hope, you did not demonstrate as a Wiki-admin. The Muslim United Nations is not a fake organisation as you follow the way of Wiki conspiracy, which is runs by secret agencies of that part of the world. I joined the Conservapedia for its credibility that differs from Wikipedia, I hope I am not mistaken about it. May I request you to restore the articles so that I can rewrite that as soon as possible, to satisfy you that have not the copyright issues, nor fake issues. Thanks. JusticeOfJustice (talk) 07:42, 25 February 2017 (EST)
No. Karajou (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Uncategorized files

We have a bit of an epidemic on our hands--there are a lot of uncatagorized files which are protected, so they cannot be taken care of. If you get a chance, is there a way you could un-protect at least a small bock so we can categorize them? I know it can be done one at a time, but can you do it in batch?
I have protect privileges (which don't work) but no unprotect privileges. Thank you! --David B (TALK) 20:13, 25 February 2017 (EST)

Madarasz's tiger parrot

Just wanted to thank you for your improvement to the article, Madarasz's tiger parrot.--IluvAviation (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Admin action request

Would you please hide this threatening edit? [4] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2017 (EST)

Impressive that you've earned a death threat from those fine, "tolerant" folks. I think I've only been sworn at. I'd say a hide is in order, but keep up the good work of frustrating vandals and trolls, 1990'sguy! --David B (TALK) 00:06, 4 March 2017 (EST)
He's just a little man; his threats revealed he's not even military, let alone a SEAL. Just some liberal whiner hanging out in his room all day, soiling his Fruit-of-the-Looms! Karajou (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2017 (EST)
I think Donald Trump's election, Trumpian news on the main page and my atheism content related edits, may have caused someone to fly into a rage.
The secular leftists are beginning to act like rats in a corner as I mentioned recently on the main page talk page. Others are turning to therapy (see: Report: Atheist Millennials Trade Faith for Therapy). Conservative (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2017 (EST)
Yes, that guy's words do show that he's not a Navy SEAL. They have too much honor to do stupid things like ranting and vandalizing CP. Still, I've never received a death threat in my life prior to this. Having a conservative like Trump in the White House really is revealing. It has shown which Republicans are actually conservative and which ones prefer leftist policies, and it has made clearer than ever how "tolerant" leftists are (even though it was quite clear to me before). --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2017 (EST)


Is there any way you could fix Template:Book so I can use it? The template is at the least not user-friendly. --1990'sguy (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (EST)

European range blocks

a /16 represents 64,000 ips. With the French elections in April, and German in September, and the fact European populist movements are thirsting for information because the mainstream media is demonizing them, and CP needs European editors to aprise us of actual facts versus our American fake news media, perhaps we should rethink the duration of such an extensive range block.

Obviously this trolling from Europe is targeted at shutting down Europeans access to information at a crucial time voters are deciding on the future of their sovereignty in the face of millions of Islamic hordes overruning Europe at the behest of EU elitists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 15:25, 25 March 2017 (EDT)

Agreed. I did that only to European data servers for no more than six months; I'll reduce it. Karajou (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Thanks. This'll be ongoing til the German elections in September. And the censorship and smearing over there is outrageous, worse than the US. Let's keep CP a breath of fresh air for European populists. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 22:30, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Yes, and for the record, I strongly agree with RobS that we need to make this site as accessible as possible to European viewers, especially considering what's happening on the continent. Our elections are over for now, but theirs are taking place. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
What I'll do in the future is block specific IPs, without the range, and only if it's a persistant problem with a troll. Karajou (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
Or shorten the range and duration of the block. I'd suggest try 24 hrs on a range; if that doesn't work, 36, 48, 72 and so on until you find on optimum duration that isn't a burden on yourself. And where hopefully the duration between abusive incidents is longer than a block. RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 2 23:40, 25 March 2017 (EDT)


After some discussion (on my talk page and Andy's) it has been decided that I start an Internet Relay Chat channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know!
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --David B (TALK) 15:34, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

Block of Thekohser

Karajou, I'm reaching out to you to discuss why my User account here was blocked for "Trolling" in January 2016. I don't recall ever trolling this website, and I'm not even sure I had any edits to this site at the time of the block. I had a conversation this morning with the owner/founder of Conservapedia, and he quickly unblocked my account. I'm just curious what happened here, not trying to "poke" you. - Thekohser (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

I checked the logs for that time; I didn't block you at all. Karajou (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
That's weird, because when I tried to edit from that account name, the "notice" that came up for me clearly indicated that you had blocked the account. Maybe it's a system-admin default, or something? Are you like a "Steward" or "Bureaucrat" on Conservapedia, or does your name "auto-fill" on some forms with outdated contacts? Regardless, it's not that important. The record seems to show that a User:TK blocked my account within one day of me registering here -- unless that was a false-flag account that one of my detractors opened here to sabotage my reputation. Not surprisingly, in the following calendar year, TK was himself blocked from participation on Conservapedia. I seem to attract the attention of erratic individuals who have trouble conforming to rules. - Thekohser (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
It was possibly a false-flag, as you said. TK was the only individual involved in the original block, and that was several years ago. Karajou (talk) 11:52, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Karajou, this guy might be able to help us update the Wikipedia#Scandals_and_decline page, he made the chart on that page. Or even the Bias in WP page. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 12:07, 25 April 2017 (EDT)
Just saw it; totally agree. Karajou (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2017 (EDT)

Hey there

Now, Karajou, let me first freely tell you that this account is a sock of Koidevelopment. That being said, don't block me on the sockery alone. I apologise for it, but I can't edit under my rightful account. Next, before you block because I'm Koidevelopment, I ask that you give me a chance and block if I deserve it, not because I'm me. Deserving it does not mean a different point of view on a subject. Deserving it does not mean that you don't personally like me. Deserving it means that I get blocked because I vandalise or blank pages or am hateful or I dox or something along those lines. Let me say it once and for all: I will never do any of those things, nor will I give you a reason to block me. I do think we could be friends. Let me stay, and let me simply edit articles that we have mutual dislike of. I don't like Islam and you don't like Islam, so let me stay to edit Islam. I know a bit about it (enough to improve it). You don't like Buddhism and I don't like Buddhism, so let me stay to edit it. See how this could be fun for both of us? I promise that I'll never edit a Christianity related article. Hold me to that promise. I actually do want to help you guys. Oh, and that Xiang Qi article? That was a legitimate one. It's quite a fun game, actually. You should try it. All the best, Li Wumei (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (EDT)

I'll even use American spelling when I edit, to sweeten the deal. Li Wumei (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Fair enough. I unblocked the Koidevelopment account if you want to use it again. Just be honest and factual in your edits. Karajou (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2017 (EDT)
Look at thaatt. I do think this'll work. If I make a mistake, feel free to roll it back or fix it. Parrrley 12:22, 4 May 2017 (EDT)


Thank you for addressing the Philadelphia ambiguity. As an admin, I know that you have "page move powers". What I suggest is that you temporarily save the current Philadelphia page offline, delete the last two changes on Philadelphia to restore it to the state that it was in before you started the project, then move Philadelphia to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This will take the history with the text. Then recreate the Philadelphia article and paste in the saved text. We need to work to keep the history (which gets lost when you just copy and paste the text into an article.) Many thanks for all that you do for Conservapedia. JDano (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Already done :) Karajou (talk) 09:48, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Locking a template

Hey, if I'm not mistaken, you have the ability to lock pages. I'd like to ask you to lock this template:

Template:Old Testament Books

The template is complete, so I would propose locking it to avoid any vandalism that may come about in the future.Korvex (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2017 (EDT)

Thanks for locking it, just noticed. Regards, Korvex (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Move requests

Would you please move Presidential Election 2012 and Presidential Election 2016 to United States presidential election, 2012 and United States presidential election, 2016, respectively? (you will need to delete the latter redirect to do so).

Andy prefers the current titles, but every other of the 56-or-so presidential election articles have the title of "United States presidential election, XXXX", so we need to be consistent in our article naming conventions. Of course, it would be great if we could find someone who is able and willing to move the 56-or-so other articles, but until that happens, we need to move these two for consistency. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Done. Karajou (talk) 09:44, 14 May 2017 (EDT)
I noticed that Andy responded to my concerns about these issues before I asked you -- I didn't see them until today. I still personally prefer consistency, but I submit his response for your consideration regardless. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

Page protect

Ought to just slap page protect on some of these targets. RobSTrump now is fighting back against the coup plotters 14:31, 14 May 2017 (EDT)

Disgusting vandal

Would you please delete the edits of this vandal. This appears to be the same guy who posted that death threat on my talk page (and he did it again today). What he wrote in every article he edited this time is blatantly disgusting. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2017 (EDT)

I wouldn't be concerned about this little clown at all. What he did was to show off exactly what we've been saying about liberals for years, and the more people find out about it, the better. Karajou (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2017 (EDT)
I assume that I also shouldn't be concerned about the crazy man who seemingly has it out on me now? --Anglican (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
Report it to James Comey at the FBI. He's a man of unquestioned integrity who surely will nail the badguys. RobSLock Up The Coup Plotters! 13:49, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
That might by tricky, Rob. Somehow his office is hard to find now. Seriously, though, I don't want to sound callous, but don't take it personally. I think we all have gotten threats, insults, etc. 1990'sguy has recently been the recipient of a death threat (the same one twice, actually), and admins are regularly ridiculed. When he comes around, we'll deal with him. Unfortunately, tunneling network connections has become incredibly easy, so fools like him don't need to understand how it works, they just click a button and become instantly able to access the site under a different IP. He'll run out of IPs and interest eventually, like they all do. Of course, talking about him just validates his efforts and probably encourages him. I suppose that can't be helped. --David B (TALK) 14:29, 17 May 2017 (EDT)
Funny, that's never worked for me. I never figured out how to work a dynamic IP, and I've only got the one Internet connection until school starts again.--Nathan (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Nice going

Karajou - I feel you're not respected enough here on the Internet. Everyone interprets your toughness as meanness. I'm glad you put up with it - and of course, I've respected you for this. A few months ago, I was doing history homework and used that article. I may have been the only person to use this site for research during this administration, and may stay that way, but you made that possible.--Nathan (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

You can play suck-up somewhere else. By your own admission, you chose to come here as a liar and a vandal. I really don't care what sort of issues you have with relativity or any other science you seem to have no knowledge of, but when you come here or anywhere else just to play liar and vandal, then it's all on your shoulders. We're not at fault; you are. Don't bother coming back. Karajou (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2017 (EDT)

JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the "travel ban" article.

I just posted this message to JDano's talk page:

"You are not allowed to edit the travel ban article anymore. I am imposing a Conservapedia:Topic ban on you for this article.

By the way, Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in terms of its Muslim population. The travel ban of the Trump administration does not include Indonesia."Conservative (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the fake news article

I posted this on JDano's talk page:

"The fake news article was locked/protected. It seems as if the root cause of the page being locked was an edit war involving yourself.

You are no longer allowed to edit the fake news article. I am imposing a Conservapedia topic ban on you for this article. See: Conservapedia:Topic ban

I hope additional topic bans are not imposed on you by people with block rights." Conservative (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

Request: Change username

After reading the rules, I want to change my username. 1990's guy told me bureaucrats can change usernames, and I was hoping if you could change mine to "Kenda". It's based on my real name, but not close enough that someone with ill intent could use it against me. --KommissarReb (talk) 9:25, 5 July 2017 (EDT)

You'll have to ask Aschlafly to make the change; he's the only bureaucrat on the site. Karajou (talk) 10:09, 5 July 2017 (EDT)

Ernst Rohm wanting permanent, continuous revolution source request.


I noticed that when you added in the history section and expanded on the unit with the Sturmabteilung article, you also added a tidbit about a known radical helming the SA, Ernst Rohm, and that he was, among other things, "an anti-Capitalist who wanted to gin up permanent, continuing revolution". I must ask, where did you get the source for that statement? It's actually interesting, because that actually sounds similar to what that scum Leon Trotsky advocated, which I even noted on various articles. Pokeria1 (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

The source is Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William L. Shirer, as well as various documentaries covering Hitler and the Long Knives incident. Karajou (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2017 (EDT)
Okay. I added the bit from Rise and Fall of the Third Reich in to the relevant articles. You're probably going to need to add in the Documentary sources, though, since... well, I don't actually know the names of the documentaries relating to the Night of the Long Knives and their connection to Hitler, and I can't just use as the source material "various documentaries covering Hitler and the Long Knives incident." Pokeria1 (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
This is a warning Rohm gave in June, 1933 about the continuance of the Nazi revolution; Rohm had at that time gloated over the fact that his SA numbered some 20 times more men than the regular army (2,000,000 vs 100,000), and there was talk of defeating elements of the right (business, finance, aristocracy, Junkers, Prussian generals, etc):
"A tremendous victory has been won. But not an absolute victory! The SA and the SS will not tolerate the German revolution going to sleep and being betrayed at the half-way stage by non-combatants. Not for the sake of the SA and SS but for Germany's sake. For the SA is the last armed force of the nation, the last defense against communism. If the German revolution is wrecked by the reactionary opposition, incompetence, or laziness, the German people will fall into despair and will be an easy prey for the bloodstained frenzy coming from the depths of Asia. If these bourgeois simpletons think that the national revolution has already lasted too long, for once we agree with them. It is in fact high time the national revolution stopped and became the National Socialist one. Whether they like it or not, we will continue our struggle - if they understand at last what it is about - with them; if they are unwilling - without them; and if necessary - against them."[5]
William Shirer goes into detail of this in his Rise and Fall of the Third Reich chapter "The Nazification of Germany: 1933-34; 'No Second Revolution'" beginning on page 204. Karajou (talk) 07:20, 21 August 2017 (EDT)
Heh, for a guy who wants to stop Soviet communism, Rohm's certainly sounding a lot like that dirtbag Leon Trotsky with that talk. I wonder if he was meant to be Germany's equivalent to Trotsky. Anyways, I'll make sure to note that chapter and page number, as well as the quote, in further edits. Since you know far more about the documentaries than I do, like I said earlier, I'll let you take care of them. Pokeria1 (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2017 (EDT)

Vandalism delete request

Please delete the article "Dildo", which was created by a vandal (unless someone else does it first). I cannot add the speedy deletion tag to it because my university's server is not letting me access the page due to the inappropriate title. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2017 (EDT)

Edit request

Hello Karajou, would you please add these links to the "See also" section of the Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism article?

--1990'sguy (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

Christianity has always.... edit

That entry while you may believe it and maybe it is true, has no bias for empirical truth. It has nothing to back it up and is therefore grossly misleading. Gloern (talk) 02:28, 23 September 2017 (EDT)

So eternal life as given by God via Jesus doesn't exist? Karajou (talk) 02:46, 23 September 2017 (EDT)

Night Sky template

The new template looks good. There are a couple of problems, mainly extra brackets appearing on some pages. I've left details on the talk page. Definitely an improvement though. FredericBernard (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2018 (EST)

That "crowdfunding the wall" troll is back

This time as "JoH." I've already looked up the question he keeps asking (and I'm sure you have too), Mexico has so far resisted attempt to be made to pay for the wall, so Diane Black proposed crowdfunding to pay for it. He needs to just look it up. It's not that hard to find out. Shobson20 (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2018 (EDT)

He's nothing. Just a young adult who still can't get over that his Sit-N-Spin toy broke at the age of seven. Karajou (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
The problem isn't Mexico refusing to pay -- Congress could easily squeeze the necessary funds out of them through several different ways if it wanted to. However, Congress doesn't want to force Mexico to pay -- they're still stuck in the old way of thinking that says the country is a good friend of America and we must continue to appease it because of that. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2018 (EDT)

He's made another Sock called "HarryDS" Shobson20 (talk) 09:43, 2 July 2018 (EDT)

And he's still nothing, as demonstrated time and time again. Karajou (talk) 09:52, 2 July 2018 (EDT)

New Essay Idea

I think, as a counter to feminism, that there needs to be an essay showing how conservatism "empowers" women more than feminism by listing women whom I find to be far stronger-willed than feminists. I'd start with Andy's mother, of course, then I'd also mention other conservative women like the NRA's Dana Loesch and Jeanine Pirro, the Fox News contributor who's unafraid to call out Liberal Hypocrisy and the Left-wing war on women. Is this appropriate? Shobson20 (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2018 (EDT)

By all means. At the very least, it can tell them that they are better off thinking for themselves, instead of playing the mindless drones that the liberal side of the fence wants them to be. Karajou (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2018 (EDT)

As to answering this troll named Joshua, you've already been told too many times you're not wanted here; you've been given multiple reasons why you're not wanted here. If you can't take those answers and process them in a normal manner, that's your problem. We don't owe you any further explanations. Have a nice day. Karajou (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2018 (EDT)

As an additional message to that idiot named Joshua, we've read your postings on that other site, and quite frankly you've shown your true colors. Telling someone on this website what they can do with themselves - with the F-word as emphasis - while you're trying to whine and beg about coming here merely gets the door shut in your face. Deal with it. Karajou (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2018 (EDT)
Are you "WWW" on that other site? Shobson20 (talk) 10:18, 24 July 2018 (EDT)
No comment  :) Karajou (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2018 (EDT)


Hi, Karajou; thanks for notifying me about my errors. I believe I've fixed them now. —Fëalórin, A Child of Him Whose Love Never Fails 20:06, 8 August 2018 (EDT)


With all due respect, why did you revert my edits to the Buddhism article? I've been Buddhist for about 35 years. I expect I know more about the subject than just about anyone else here. FredJ (talk) 18:11, 23 September 2018 (EDT)

Can you back up your own statement with proof you're a Buddhist? You put in three edits to that page; the first two was as if you inserted your own facts on the subject without a source, while the third was the insertion of a fact tag in the manner that someone else was needed to find a source for the statement in question.
So far the only consistent thing I've seen from you is an attraction to categories and arrogance, and I've seen it before in a user who called himself Abcqwe. This is an encyclopedia, and not some site where a user can come in with an axe to grind. Karajou (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
I don't believe there is a way to prove one is a Buddhist. We don't have baptismal certificates or such. We have only our practice and our sincere commitment to the precepts, including, for me, "Manifest truth; Do not lie."
There's no such thing as anyone's "own facts"; there are only FACTS (that is, outside of Trumpworld with its "alternative facts"). I began with the intention to improve the woeful state of your current Buddhism-related articles, but was met with resistance right away. If I choose to continue to try to improve the information about Buddhism here, I will provide sources for everything. Strangely, you don't seem concerned with the lack of support for what is already present in the articles. I take it that it is customary here for "acceptable" writers to put in whatever they want without evidentiary support, while those who question that content are required to search for & find the sources that should have been provided in the first place. Fine, but that is quite the opposite of how things work in the real world.
Yes, I took it upon myself to try to clean up the horrible state of categorisation on this site. Sorry. I won't try to help again. May this site happily wallow in its awfulness. It would be proper, however, for you to provide some examples of my "arrogance" and whatever "axe to grind" you think I've shown, but I have no expectation that you actually will do so. FredJ (talk) 23:20, 23 September 2018 (EDT)
You have abandoned a cardinal precept which you claimed you adhere to within the very correspondence in which it appears! Conservapedia is not awful; it is faithful to the created spiritual reality that Sacred Scripture presents. The carnal-minded man or woman thinks worldly pursuits are his or her only concern, while the spiritual man or woman seeks the Kingdom of Heaven and the practice of doing what it requires.
I can't take your correspondence seriously; your only effect is that of trying to mock Conservapedia by mis-describing it within the context of your own practice of self-contradiction.
Just as SamHB has "assisted" you by agreeing with your cynical viewpoint, I am helping Karajou, being familiar with this type of detraction with which you are trying to disrupt Conservapedia.
If you think you are going to "relax" in your armchair, as you put it, and criticize Conservapedia for not living up to moral standards that you simply renounce to begin with, you'd better think again, since who would tolerate such a thing? VargasMilan (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

FredJ, or whoever you are, you proved your arrogance by your reply here; you proved you're a liar by your petty edits in a few articles since. I hardly think Buddhism teaches you to do both. Have a nice day. Karajou (talk) 02:56, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

Is there any article about Atheists' biblical ignorance?

There ought to be. If you've seen the way Atheists misrepresent the Bible, you know how bad their knowledge is. One of the most common claims is that Christians "ignore" Leviticus and Deuteronomy because we don't follow those old Jewish laws. Even Richard Dawkins uses this bad argument, despite the fact that I can find tons of resources that explain why:

A) The Jewish ceremonial laws never applied to the Gentiles and

B) Even the Jews are no longer under the law

Another one is God being "genocidal" for wiping out the Canaanites and leaving out the fact that they were an evil Pagan cult that sacrificed their children to their false god Molech. Most of their attacks on God have to do with:

A) Taking Bible verses out of context and omitting information critical to understanding what is actually going on

B) Judging God for not conforming to their personal standards of what they think a God should be

Shobson20 (talk) 09:59, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

You might be interested in these articles, though I don't now if they're exactly what you're looking for:
--1990'sguy (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2018 (EDT)
I'm thinking of adding a section to Atheism and the Bible along the lines of "Common Atheist misunderstandings of the Bible" to address some of the issues discussed before. In main article space though, the rules are different, and I'm used to writing essays, So I'm not sure if I can make it fit the Manual of Style. Shobson20 (talk) 10:49, 25 September 2018 (EDT)

Collateral damage

Karajou: You got a military background. Would you be interested in starting a collateral damage article for us, since such notable domestic terrorists as Timothy McVeigh and Nancy Pelosi have caused the term to enter into mainstream political discourse? RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 14:50, 25 October 2018 (EDT)

I could try it. Karajou (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
Thanks. I'm thinking two basic sections, one how it originates as a military term, and two how it's seeped into mainstream usage by single-party socialists like Nancy Pelosi to express their agenda. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 20:16, 25 October 2018 (EDT)
The military definition is pretty much done; if you can think of something further or more detailed you're welcome to do so. I also thought of the political definition as well, and yes, it should go in too. Karajou (talk) 01:39, 27 Octlober 2018 (EDT)
,,Looks good. Thanks! RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 10:35, 27 October 2018 (EDT)


Why did you delete the page I am trying to create for columnist Ilana Mercer? I was editing a section and then all of a sudden ... gone? --KerryC 00:46, 20 November 2018 (EST)KerryC

For the record, the page had only two words: "Ilana Mercer." That's not encyclopedic. It must be a full article, and it should have sources. I recommend you read these pages -- you'll find them helpful: Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles, Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages --1990'sguy (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2018 (EST)
Sorry, Kerry. All I saw at the time was just two words. Please recreate it, without interruption from me. Karajou (talk) 01:49, 20 November 2018 (EST)

I need help from a senior admin

Could you hide the intermediate edits on the page Haskell, starting with the first one from "ihatehumans" until the current one from me? I thought it was vandalism, so I undid it, but then after realizing it was not vandalism, I undid my undoing, put then I noticed that it was copied from Wikipedia, so I undid it again. Since we shouldn't see any content copied from Wikipedia, I think it's appropriate to hide those edits. Shobson20 (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2018 (EST)

A Vandal called "JohnsonG" vandalized several pages so that they would show only black. I've fixed all those pages (though I had to go to the history page to do so). I would like you to hide all of those vandal revisions so that no one can see the black pages. Shobson20 (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2018 (EST)

Done. Karajou (talk) 00:48, 26 December 2018 (EST)

Would you please restore the pages Windows 2000 Professional and Windows longhorn? They were created by a sock, but both DavidB4 and I think they're worth keeping (and we both improved them before Cons deleted them). --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2018 (EST)

Windows 2000 Professional was just a redirect to Windows 2000, so it probably doesn't really matter whether or not it is restored. However, Windows longhorn had some valid content which I think is worth keeping. Thank you! --David B (TALK) 20:06, 27 December 2018 (EST)
Done.Conservative (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2018 (EST)

Someone put a death threat on Andy's talk page

A user named WBurton said something really bad on Andy's talk page. I've already undone the vandalism and blocked him, now I would appreciate it if a senior admin would hide the entry from the history. Shobson20 (talk) 15:39, 15 January 2019 (EST)

I wonder if he was a member of this website: Essay: The internet island of atheism that has been bypassed?
One thing that is almost certainly true, he was angered by the factually correct and well-cited work related to Atheism and animal abuse. When the death threat occurred, I was on a spree of creating material related to this topic.Conservative (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2019 (EST)

Strange Emails

I hvae been receiving emails from an MK who is informing me of some NJP on Conservapedia. This person claims that there is a protocol, NJ, and two conservapedia mods are in on it. Should I be worried, and what is he talking about? EasternOrthodox (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2019 (EST)

Nothing to worry about at all. Just a clown trying to get under your skin by sending you some bovine excrement from his land of make-believe. Karajou (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2019 (EST)

Japan map update

What seems to be a single-purpose account requested an update of your file File:Japan_location.png with one they apparently made. See: Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests#15_January_request.
Does this sound right to you? Thanks! --David B (TALK) 23:00, 28 February 2019 (EST)

If this request is the only reason he came in - and no other edits - then no. Karajou (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2019 (EST)

Other account blocked

Is it true that you blocked my other account for spamming links to external sites?--Myrtonos86 (talk) 19:43, 28 March 2019 (EDT)

Yes. Is there a problem? Karajou (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2019 (EDT)


I enjoy reading your contributions to various discussions. From my POV you're a clever guy (or girl? Sorry - I don't know which!). Cheers! JohnSelway (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

Marlene Dietrich

Why was my edit on her page reverted? (King Conservative (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)

Do you have a source for such a posting? In fact, do you have sources for anything you recently posted? The last time I looked, a pocket camera was something you could get at any Kmart and slip into your jeans, unless isle B catered to CIA and KGB agents only. Karajou (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2019 (EDT)
Come on, I asked first, also the pocket camera had NOTHING to do with the CIA or any other spies for the record, I honestly have ZERO idea where you get THAT idea from, lol. :P And to answer your question, my sources come from some wikis. (King Conservative (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)
And I have ZERO idea where you got both your nonsense edit to Marlene Dietrich, and your idea that pocket cameras are exclusively used by armed robbers. Are you engaged in parody here? Karajou (talk) 04:41, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
No, I am not. (King Conservative (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2019 (EDT)King Conservative)

Website called Christopedia

Were you an editor on a site with this name? EasternOrthodox (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2019 (EDT)

Never heard of it until now. Karajou (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2019 (EDT)
We have an article about it. EasternOrthodox (talk) 01:13, 5 May 2019 (EDT)
Articles get created daily here, and some I don't know about, just as websites get created daily. This Christopedia apparently was created in 2008, and didn't last long. That's a problem with people creating a website based on the MediaWiki platform; they think of high aspirations on creating an encyclopedia on something, but if the niche on the subject is already filled, it will generally fail. Karajou (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2019 (EDT)

Delete all evidence of the Communist apologist

A communist named MarxistLeninist made a whole bunch of socks to evade blocks and got really annoying. I would appreciate it if you would hide all edits from both the original account and all of his socks, as well as the user creation logs. This guy doesn't deserve the attention. Shobson20 (talk) 10:06, 15 July 2019 (EDT)

Of course. He's a liar as well; his proxies confirm it. Karajou (talk) 11:37, 15 July 2019 (EDT)

New troll making a bunch of socks and joke articles that need deletion

Check the User creation log Shobson20 (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2019 (EDT)

High-Pocrissy, fer Pete's Sake!

Your link does direct to your blog but a blank page on it.--Chewy Suarez (talk) 13:52, 31 July 2019 (EDT)

Thanks for the heads up. Fixed. Karajou (talk) 14:01, 31 July 2019 (EDT)

As a former U.S. Navy man....

As a former U.S. Navy man, I thought you might like this: There are no atheists on a sinking ship. Conservative (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2019 (EDT)

The article ranks #1 at Google for the term "There are no atheists on a sinking ship". :)Wikignome72 (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2019 (EDT)

Avro aircraft

Thank you for adding a photo to Avro Vulcan. If you could add a photo to Avro Lancaster as well, I'd be grateful. Desmonduk (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2019 (EDT)

Done. Karajou (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2019 (EDT)

Page deletions

I notice that you have deleted my new page within two hours of my creating it, with the grounds being "We're not promoting this site at all," which I don't think is a good article. For one, I never claimed to be promoting the subject of my article. In fact, I think I made it clear enough that I'm not supporting it. Also, there's a lot of other things that Conservapedia doesn't support. Google, Wikipedia, Apple, and the Democratic Party are all unpromoted by Conservapedia, but nobody deletes their articles, so what sould make mine any dofferent. Fire$hark (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2019 (EDT)

The issue has been discussed and determined long before you arrived. And you know about it as well, as it happens to be one of the first articles that you determined to create. Karajou (talk) 12:15, 13 October 2019 (EDT)
Still, couldn't you have at least have had a better reason to delete my article than the one typed into the deletion summary. Also, I already created two articles before that one. Fire$hark (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2019 (EDT)

Stupid troll makes stupid troll post with profanity that needs to be hidden

That same stupid troll that keeps making socks insulting the admins made another stupid comment on Talk:Main Page Shobson20 (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2020 (EST)

And tomorrow, he'll still be a loser. Karajou (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2020 (EST)
As well as what I nickname him because of his childishness and immaturity (which reflects in his trolling posts) - the Juvenile Delinquent. Northwest (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2020 (EST)

Geopolitician is edit warring

On the Ted Cruz and George W. Bush articles. I mean Ted Cruz a RINO? Really? Shobson20 (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2020 (EDT)

Don't worry too much about it, I noticed them and am reverting the conspiratorial nonsense. --Liberaltears (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
Unless a senior admin steps in, Geopolitician is just going to keep putting it back. Shobson20 (talk) 22:41, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
You want to discuss this? Let's do it.--Geopolitician (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
Make your case about why my edits are wrong.--Geopolitician (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
You're replacing content that's 95% factual with mere conspiracies. --Liberaltears (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
First off, I did not replace a single thing in the George W. Bush article. I removed a category at the bottom of the page and didn't replace it with anything. Specifically, I removed the "Patriots" category, because I don't believe Bush deserves to be called a patriot.
Second, Let me address my Ted Cruz edits, one by one.
  1. I edited the section that claimed that "Cruz ended his national political career" because he refused to endorse Trump at the convention in Cleveland. I edited it to reflect that his career did not end because of what he did. And that's objectively true. He was re-elected, and Trump endorsed him in his re-election bid. That is 100% factual.
  2. I created a paragraph claiming that former Cruz supporters have attempted to sabotage Trump's presidency. It may sound conspiratorial on the surface, but it's not. If you want, you can keep that paragraph off for now, while I gather sources to prove my case. My main focus is on Bannon, who pushed for Cruz behind the scenes in 2016 and then attempted to assume the mantle of a populist ideologue, all the while trying to define populism according to his terms, some which are totally antithetical to conservative ideals. I actually wanted to edit the Bannon article to elaborate on this as well, but so far I have held back out of fear of being blocked.
  3. I removed the "Conservatism" template from the bottom of the page. And I'm pretty sure Andy would support such a move. After all, it was Andy who created the Cruzites article, which explicitly states that Cruz is not a sincere conservative.
  4. I removed the "Conservatives," "Pro Second Amendment," and "Patriots" categories. I'm pretty sure Andy would support removing the first and third of those categories. The second is a bit more controversial, but I can't bring myself to accept the idea that neocons are pro-Second Amendment after all the tyrannical garbage that has come out of that movement.--Geopolitician (talk) 23:12, 12 March 2020 (EDT)
  5. I also added "RINOs" and "Neoconservative" categories. I'm pretty sure Andy would support this.--Geopolitician (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2020 (EDT)

What was Cruz like before 2016, vs after 2016, in relation to Trump? Define the terms "patriotism" and "neo-conservatism" (those could be separate articles). Remember, we are editing an encyclopedia; facts don't care about feelings, so it's OK to put in what so-and-so was like at a particular point in time, and what he's like now. As to the label "RINO", I think that should be defined as a Republican who sides with the Democrats so much he might as well change parties. Karajou (talk) 02:18, 13 March 2020 (EDT)

Yeah, and besides, when Trump became the nominee and the president, Cruz ended up swallowing his pride and even asking Trump what he'll do as his first order of business under him, so it's extremely unlikely he's a RINO, let alone a Neocon. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:44, 13 March 2020 (EDT)
Honestly, I rather respect Cruz. He was running for president, but just barely lost the primary. His opponent (Trump) was meanwhile declaring to the world that Cruz was a liar. This may have been true, but I never heard what exactly Cruz supposedly lied about. Then when Trump won, Cruz "swallowed his pride" and became a strong advocate of his former opponent. He has been pushing legislation in support of Trump, had some strong words to say in Trump's defense during the impeachment sham, and has overall been supportive of Trump's policies. Cruz might not have been a perfect choice, but I think this overall shows that he has a lot of character. I have yet to see him sell out his voter base. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we have Trump in office, I just don't know if Cruz really deserves the beating he is taking from some republicans (some of which are themselves neocons).
In regard to this article itself, it is clearly a controversial topic, or we wouldn't be having this discussion. I know there are a few outspoken people here who seem to genuinely despise Cruz. So, perhaps rather than editorializing in this article, we should endeavor to stick to the facts only. Remember, the MSM tells people what to think. We should try to tell people the facts, and let them decide. Can we tell both sides of the controversy objectively? --DavidB4 (TALK) 10:11, 13 March 2020 (EDT)

I'll be brutally honest here. I have a great personal vendetta against the neocon movement in general. I came of age during the Bush and early Obama years, and was raised to love the neocon movement. But as I grew older and saw what people like McCain, Graham, and Rubio were doing regarding the crisis in Syria, I rejected neoconservatism and began to oppose it. For a while, I felt that it was only certain people (like McCain, Graham, and Rubio) that were bad, and there were good neocons out there. That changed after Trump's election. I've watched people like Kushner, Pompeo, Esper, Haley, Bolton, Haspel, and others very closely. And some of their behind-the-scenes conduct has been absolutely reprehensible, in my humble opinion. I wondered, "why are they doing this?" Then, I found out about the petrodollar, and how it works. And it all made sense to me. Since then, I have adopted a zero-tolerance attitude towards neocon tendencies when it comes to foreign policy. I believe that the neocon interventionists are acting in bad faith, on behalf of corrupt interests (especially the Saudi regime). I don't want to stand for that. --Geopolitician (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2020 (EDT)

FUNimation page deleted labled as advertisement when it wasn't.

The page was against their libral practices like other pages on this wiki. I think it was probably mistaken as advertisement due to lack of sources. I want the page back and I want to improve the page including adding sources. I was following how the page on The Walt Disney Company was created. I think FUNimation needs a page here and was mistakenly deleted. It just needs some citations which was probably why you mistook it as advertisement. Can you restore the page and let me add some more information including more of their shady liberal business practices and add citations? If so, thanks. -- Conservaboy 10:46, 13 March 2020 [PT]


I created a User account JimthePopulist, but you blocked it. I could not find out how to contact you so I created a new account to reach out to you about why you blocked it for “trolling.” I have not made any edits. Thank you. --JimConservatism (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2020 (EDT)


Any chance you can assist with my homework assignment? I started the Trump article but Conservative deleted it because the title didn’t meet certain standards. --JLind (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2020 (EDT)

The answer is no, for several reasons. First, you made the claim that Trump made thousands of lies, so it's either put up or shut up. Second, to be confirmed as actual lies, they cannot be refuted at all, so if Trump said he was a girl scout at the age of fifteen, then that would be an example of an irrefutable lie. Third, if all of these lies Trump allegedly said turn out to be totally and completely made up by by those who hate him - and you can bank on the fact that we will have evidence posted here backing it up - where will you stand on the matter? Are you going to stand with people who hate the guy so much that creating and pushing lies is the only way to take him down? If that's the case, then you're not much of a man. Something to think about. Karajou (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2020 (EDT)

16:36, 21 April 2020 (EDT)

1. I NEVER made the claim that ‘Trump made thousands of lies’. Either you show where I did or YOU ‘put up or shut up’. I did claim he was ‘lying or distorting the truth over 15,000 times over his first three years in office’.
Which is it then? You claimed it was "lying or distorting the truth over 15,000 times" , or you never claimed the "...thousand of lies" . 15,000 lies equals thousands of lies, so you're claiming it all, or you're not.Karajou (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
2. On April 20, yesterday, Trump claimed he hadn’t left the White House in months except for one official visit to the USNS Comfort. Yet it is an irrefutable fact he held a rally on March 2 and tried to deny it. Are you going to admit he lied or will you simply wave it away? Irrefutable lies are easy to find, yet for some reason, Trump sycophants have trouble dealing with reality. Did you know Trump gloated about winning the presidency on his first try? Nothing special about that. But he lied when he claimed to have never run before. He vied for the Reform Party nomination during the 2000 election. Did you know Trump actually wanted Democrats and RINOs on his cabinet? Easily verifiable facts.
And not leaving the White House "in months" is a dire threat to this nation for what reason? The only thing wrong about the March 2 rally was clowns on your side of the fence preventing Trump supporters from going to a restaurant - Bojangles - after the rally was over. And I do think greater damage was done to this country by your side of the fence - specifically Obama, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton - when they allowed four Americans to die in Benghazi, then lied about that repeatedly, blaming a stupid video for it. And it's quite obvious which sort of individual you'll vote for Karajou (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
3. Are you actually saying Conservapedia has articles that completely refute any and every alleged lie that Trump has told? I can actually bank on the fact that you will provide the links
Yes, as a matter of fact, we are. Karajou (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
4. As for where I stand? I stand on the facts. It is a fact that our president has distorted the truth and told lies. Anyone else who thinks otherwise and blindly genuflects to the alleged stable genius is not much of a man. Something to think about. --JLind (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
Oh no you don't, and you've been doing that since day one. You've never sided with facts at all, and your presence here is filled with not only a liberal POV that you're trying to shovel into this site, but clear testimony that you will side with genuine liars in a heartbeat if it means taking down the entire country just to get rid of Trump. And you come here because you think we're just a bunch of pushovers. Not going to work at all. Karajou (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
One: You did make that claim and now you're trying to deny it and act all offended because you got called out on it.

Two: Waving away anything that's not convenient to a liberal's argument is exactly what liberals like you do themselves. Where do you get your information for your claims, CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times or the Washington Post (or all of them)?

Three: I could tell you to do your own research and look up actual non-liberal-biased sites that tell the truth, but I know you won't because you'll be told what you don't want to hear and you'd rather believe what the liberal media tells you without question.

Four: You have no "facts" to stand on, only what the liars in front of the cameras in the liberal media tell you (and that foundation is built on sand). Also, taking what someone says and parroting it back to them in mockery (and you do this because of a lack of originality) only reflects poorly on you. So as you've been told before, better mind your step here, JLind. Northwest (talk) 18:50, 21 April 2020 (EDT)
Now wait a minute, if Trump said he was a girl scout at 15, that doesn't preclude the possibility that Trump may secretly identify as female but due to institutional homophobia he's afraid to come out of the closet. So it's not necessarily a lie at all. RobSLive Free or Die 17:30, 21 April 2020 (EDT)

Recent trolls that need to be blocked, etc...

Hello Karajou, I request that this user and this user be blocked for trolling and for removing content from pages, in addition to the fact that the latter user's name is not appropriate. Also, I don't know if it's just me, but the source for this page seems quite similar to the source for the Wikipedia page on the subject. Thanks Karajou! --LiberaltearsYour reminder that Biden committed quid pro joe 19:25, 25 April 2020 (EDT)

Never mind about the latter user and the Ahasuerus page I was referring to, it seems that DavidB4 got to those. --LiberaltearsYour reminder that Biden committed quid pro joe 19:51, 25 April 2020 (EDT)

Hiding revisions on two CP pages

Hi Karajou, can you hide several vandalized revisions on this page and this page? I asked DavidB4 about it on his talk page here, but he said that he wasn't able to hide the revisions. Thank you Karajou! --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 13:32, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Those I cannot do, either. Karajou (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Wait, why? I thought Administrators can hide revisions or simply delete them. After all, Conservative and Wikignome72 have done that before. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 13:39, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
The trick is to do that revision before you ban the clown who did it with a "hide user name" function. Karajou (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
So is it now impossible to hide/delete the revisions? --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 13:48, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Just in those specific cases. I discovered that a few years ago as well. Karajou (talk) 13:51, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Why is set up that way, though? After all, even if the usernames had already been removed, why would that not allow the revisions to be hidden? Besides, can the usernames just briefly be restored so that the revisions can be hidden/deleted? --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 13:53, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Tried restoring the username as you suggested, but it didn't work. Karajou (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
I wouldn't worry too much about it. They're just advertisements to elect Biden, and he's going to lose anyway. Karajou (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
I dunno if they're meant as advertisements to elect Biden. The reason I've been really concerned over this is simply and only because those revisions contain inappropriate links added by the vandal accounts to extremely obscene websites, and it's better to just remove all traces of it. After all, other revisions have been fully deleted before, and I just think these should be as well. Is there any possible way to revert the action of hiding a username? From what I read here, it says that a developer can restore hidden revisions, but I don't know if this also applies to usernames. Besides, this special page clearly states that Administrators can “Delete and undelete specific revisions of pages”. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 14:22, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

As far as I'm concerned, any porn reference is an advertisement for Biden. Karajou (talk) 14:25, 18 May 2020 (EDT)

Can you somewhat clarify on that? --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 14:26, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
The link in the China page was probably put in by the Chinese 50 cent army. RobSLive Free or Die 14:29, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Whoever put the link in isn't even worth 50 cents anyways. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 14:33, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
I'm simply concerned with the fact that the inappropriate revisions still remain. Is removing a username strictly a one-way street on CP? It seems that almost all other actions can be reverted, including deletions. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 14:33, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Unless you can remember the user name, or find some other way to trace it, you probably can't undo the block and recreate a deleted account. RobSLive Free or Die 15:08, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
The vandal accounts were this one and this one. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 15:31, 18 May 2020 (EDT)
Ok, would "mass delete" get rid of it? Perhaps Karajou would know. I think these were the only contribs. RobSLive Free or Die

Coreo removing content from Video game page

Hi Karajou, can you look into the edits of this user and block if need be? That person has suspiciously removed massive amounts of content from this page and inserted a more liberal point of view. (page history here). Thank you! --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 01:37, 7 June 2020 (EDT)

I see that you blocked Coreo. Thanks! --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 11:44, 7 June 2020 (EDT)

Blocking another troll (and potential sockpuppet)

Hi Karajou, can you block this user who's potentially a troll of NoMoreFakeNews and remove the profane/vulgar edit summaries? Thanks! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 20:41, 18 June 2020 (EDT)

It seems that Northwest has blocked the user. Can you still remove the edit summaries? Thank you! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 22:54, 18 June 2020 (EDT)

Hiding two revisions on this page

Hi Karajou, can you hide the two most recent vandalized revisions on this page? Thanks! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 11:21, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Should we put on page protect for autoconfirmed users? RobSTrump 2Q2Q 17:08, 21 June 2020 (EDT)
That won't deter vandalism; any registered user is considered "autoconfirmed". After all, this troll was able to vandalize this semi-protected page as the first edit one minute after creating the account (see here and here). —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 17:23, 21 June 2020 (EDT)
Is there a way to add a protection level that only allows Skipcaptcha users to edit? RobSTrump 2Q2Q 18:28, 21 June 2020 (EDT)
I wouldn't know, as I don't have the "protect" or "Administrator" tag. However, I highly doubt it, as I noticed that the only two protection levels are "autoconfirmed only" (semi-protected) or "Administrators only" (fully protected). —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 18:54, 21 June 2020 (EDT)

Please delete this page

Hi Karajou, can you please delete this user page, which initially was a profane rant made the account that was soon blocked by RobSmith? (see diff here) Thanks! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 16:20, 5 July 2020 (EDT)

Please block another troll

Hi Karajou, can you please block this vandal and delete this revision? Thank you! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! 22:35, 16 July 2020 (EDT)

Important question

Hi Karajou, there's something important I ought to ask you about; I noticed in RobSmith's block log here that there was apparently some conflict eight years ago and even beyond that. What was it specifically that he did then and does it in any way parallel what's happening right now? In regards to the RobSmith/Dataclarifier/etc. conflict that went on for a while, it seems that some of the anti-Catholic editors have engaged in suspicious and questionable actions, as I'm listing here. If you have the time, can you please thoroughly check on all of it and evaluate? Thank you once again Karajou, as you've always been helpful when needed! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 15:34, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

Talk to User:Conservative who has also been following this, he(they?) will tell you a very different story. Shobson20 (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

Conservative is just another one of those anti-Catholic zealots; see the second entry here. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 15:57, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
User:Conservative has been following the conversations on the talk page and recommended that Protestant vs Catholic discussions should be moved to Debate pages and RobSmith has complied with this, and so have I. Those of the Catholic side have been doing plenty of pushing of their own, but Liberaltears is trying to spin a "Catholics are being bullied by the mean Protestants" when the Catholics have been just as polemic. Shobson20 (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
I was referring to this diff, not this one. Read all the entries listed, and you'll hopefully understand what I'm talking about. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 16:06, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

[6] This edit removed by User:Conservative was an attempt by a Catholic to hijack the article and turn it into an anti-Protestant Polemic soapbox and Conservative explains why that way removed here [7] Shobson20 (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

[8] This was one of Dataclarifier's many attempts to hijack articles and turn them into Catholic soapboxes with anti-Protestant polemics. Shobson20 (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

I think LiberalTears is concern-trolling by calling his objections to the way RobS is carrying out his administrative duties "important" and that they represent a situation where Rob is doing them in a manner that needs remediation. From what I've seen, the four of them resent RobS's corrections and work in tandem to prevent having to defer to him. VargasMilan (talk) Monday, 16:34, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

(reply to VargasMilan) According to someone who got his feelings hurt last time because I rationally responded to something even Conservative deemed to be "trolling" such that it got moved from Talk:Main Page to his own talk page! 😂😂😂 —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 17:29, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Man. What a bully! VargasMilan (talk) Tuesday, 08:32, 21 July 2020 (EDT)
According to the "editor" (who mainly talks and talks and talks) who jokes about blocking a faithful user over a humorous nickname given for a sleazy Democrat politician. Oh, and that's not to mention that you continuously tried to agitate me on User talk:NishantXavier (see here for evidence of your mobocratic behavior), because who would've thought that you had secret mind-reading powers this entire time? —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Tuesday, 13:25, 21 July 2020 (EDT)
And yet here you are, whining to Karajou like a child and posting insults with "ha ha" emojis everywhere. Shobson20 (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
And just how am I "whining"? Do you need me to remind you again that you were the one who complained when NishantXavier was promoted and you haven't yet been? —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 19:49, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

Karajou: Look at this full context [9] from Cafeteria Christianity before it was edited:

However, cafeteria Christianity is not limited to the left side of the political spectrum: conservative Christians are also fond of citing Scripture selectively in order to expose hypocrisy while explaining away the same issues in their own camp (such as criticizing the Catholic Church for covering up child molestation among its priests—arguing that the problem is due to the Church's prohibition against priests marrying—while ignoring similar cases involving married pastors or leaders within major Protestant churches or denominations). A notable example of "right-wing" cafeteria Christianity is the Westboro Baptist Church; their followers quote verses about God's judgment but ignore those about mercy. Espousing cafeteria Christianity invalidates a person's Christian witness....[my bolden]

Liberaltears edit warred, re-inserted controversial passages twice, and refused to engage on the discussion page.

(A) Where is there a selective use of scripture in condemning pedophilia? (B) Does a person loose their Christian witness for criticizing pedophilia?

This has nothing to do whatsoever with a Catholic v. Protestant debate. This material does not belong in that article. And frankly, this lame defense of pedophilia is disgusting. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 18:55, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

Of course you would only highlight the first part of the phrase; the last part reads "while ignoring similar cases involving married pastors or leaders within major Protestant churches or denominations". By selectively taking the entire phrase out of context, you're making a strawman attack. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 19:49, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Put down the meth pipe. It just makes you more paranoid. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 19:51, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
You know very well that I never defended pedophilia or child molestation; while I'm aware that the entire phrase could've been worded better, you're taking it out of context. Why don't you embolden the entire phrase rather than only the first part? The last part makes it clear that the entire phrase is regarding inconsistent application of logic and not defending pedophilia. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Monday, 19:55, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
And duuh, where is there an "attack" by wanting to remove a paragraph full of nonsense? You put an attack paragraph back in twice. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 19:59, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Now you're skipping the point. You spent today falsely claiming that I'm somehow defending pedophilia (see here), making the same type of strawman attack multiple times. I thought CP editors knew better than to engage in such amateurish and pathetic high school behaviors. And besides, the paragraph you removed makes good points and isn't "full of nonsense", so long as you don't take it out of context. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Tuesday, 20:06, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Why didn't you just rewrite the problematic paragraph on the talk page as requested rather than bring it here? RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:09, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Let me see if I can follow your logic and reasoning: Removing a paragraph that attacks catholic priests for pedophilia is an anti-Catholic attack. Is that correct? RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:13, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
On the very page Liberaltears links to, RobS explained to you that condemning pedophilia in the Catholic Church has nothing to do with cherry-picking scripture, which is what Cafeteria Christianity means. It's another attempt to hijack an article on this site to turn it into a Pro-Catholic, anti-Protestant polemic. Shobson20 (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
The whole paragraph is nothing but whataboutism, and on a whataboutism scale of 1 to 10, it doesn't even rate a 1. Worse yet, it's topped off with a Satanic lie that a person looses their Christian witness for talking about pedophile priests. Just toss this garbage out. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:45, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

RobS said, and I quote "Bible believing, conservative Protestant Christianity doesn't have a big problem with pedophilia. I have never seen this being a problem in my local area and I don't see it happening nationally. But the Catholic Church has a huge problem with this. The report released Thursday by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said the 2019 report — which covered July 2018 through June 2019 — counted 4,434 allegations of clergy sex abuse against minors.[10] A global look at the Catholic Church’s sex abuse problem.[11], Associated Press, 2019"
He also said "I know there are homosexual, liberal Protestants and liberal Protestantism embrace homosexuality. And Bill Donahue of the Catholic League points out that it was male children who were primarily molested by Catholic priests and there was a male, homosexual Catholic priest problem in the USA.[12][13] I hear many reports about homosexual priests in the USA and in the Vatican (and staunch Catholics like Michael Voris are reporting on this matter too). See the video by the staunch, Catholic Michael Voris at: The Vortex — The Homosexual Papacy?." Shobson20 (talk) 20:01, 20 July 2020 (EDT)
Ah, that was Conservative that said that. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:07, 20 July 2020 (EDT

Anti-Catholic zealout?

For the record, at this point in my life, I am not a zealot for any anti cause - especially Catholicism.

Catholicism in much of the the West is imploding. So why would I waste my time being an anti-Catholic zealot?

"...we face a bleak future when it comes to the growth of our Catholic religion." - Catholic Journal, May 6, 2019[14] Conservative (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2020 (EDT)

My two cents

The Bible is the Word of God, and as such it is to be followed first, last, and always. If you have a note or piece of doctrine that differs from what the Bible says, then you go with the Bible. Karajou (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2020 (EDT)

Do you think maybe this article, Cafeteria Christianity should be deleted? It was created as an attack article (see liberal Template) against people of other denominations. It has no scriptural foundation (except for what I started adding the other day), and is probably hopelessly unrepairable. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 16:42, 21 July 2020 (EDT)
I think we should keep it, for the simple reason that I have heard too many times from people who have stated they are Christians on Sundays only. Pretty sad. Karajou (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2020 (EDT)
It's going to need a lot of work, cause people want to just fill it up with attacks and condemnation on other believers rather than present any scriptural doctrine. I'm going to begin repairing it by striping off the {liberal traits Template} and try, over time, to make it more biblically based. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 17:10, 21 July 2020 (EDT)

Page protection for U.S. "Party-switch" myth, etc.

Hi Karajou, thank you for protecting this page after that dimwitted troll was continuously vandalizing the article. Just to note though, the problem is that I don't have an "Administrator" tag to edit the page, and many other editors won't be able to add more interesting information to the great article. How do you suppose non-administrators can make additions to the page? Should we give very specific requests for you to add certain details to very specific sections/parts? Also, can you please delete the edit summaries for this troll account's edit warring and this rollback of yours, and then use oversight to hide that troll? I'm making this very specific request in this order so that all references to the obscene "name" can be removed. Finally, I just want to note that I'm currently using a proxy to edit CP pages for now because it's the only way I can bypass "403 - Forbidden" pop-ups at the moment; please don't issue a block over this in case you see me editing under a proxy IP address. Thank you very much Karajou! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Thursday, 01:19, 20 August 2020 (EDT)

When you are ready to edit a page that has protection on it, ask any available admin to unlock it for you. And not to worry about proxy blocks where you're concerned; only losers get blocked! Karajou (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2020 (EDT)
Oh, okay. Thanks Karajou! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Thursday, 07:32, 20 August 2020 (EDT)

Yet another sock of the juvenile delinquent...

Hi Karajou, can you please delete the revisions left by this recent vandal, especially the ones on Talk:Main Page? Thank you once again! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Friday, 01:11, 28 August 2020 (EDT)

If they're not whining about you, you're probably doing something wrong. :)
I tried hiding it, just to see if anything has changed for me on the new server. Well, it changed; now instead of being shown a scripting error message, I just get a blank screen. I guess that just isn't going to get fixed. --DavidB4 (TALK) 01:29, 28 August 2020 (EDT)
Good point to bring up about the juvenile delinquent and their sockpuppet attack accounts! There has recently been a few troll accounts created for the purpose of smearing me, and I guess it means that I've contributed enough edits over the past nine days or so to be noticed like this. Also, about hiding revisions, if I understand correctly, there may be two ways to do so: deleting them or using oversight. According to here, it seems that there's a difference between the two actions, as different descriptions are associated with them. Deleting revisions of pages is only listed as a right under "Administrators", while hiding revisions is listed as a right only under "Oversighters". If I understand correctly, I think you tried to use oversight to hide the revision, since you have that tag but not the "Administrator" tag. On the other hand, I've noticed that when Karajou, RobSmith, or Conservative deletes revisions, those actions are recorded in the deletion log. If revisions are removed via oversight, I would assume the actions show up in the suppression log, but I don't have permission to view the latter. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Friday, 01:55, 28 August 2020 (EDT)

Please mass-delete this troll's page creations

Hi Karajou, can you please nuke the pages created by Imgayhitlerwashot? I blocked the idiot, though the spam/troll pages have yet to be deleted. Thank you! —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier be well! | Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot! Saturday, 00:07, 5 September 2020 (EDT)

My edits on Maria Butina, Benjamin Netanyahu, Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, Jair Bolsonaro, Viktor Orban, and Matteo Salvini

Why did you revert them? Is it because they’re not Americans or something? I mean, you don’t have to be American to be a patriot, conservative, or Pro-2A. (King Conservative (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2020 (EDT)King Conservative)

Butina isn't American. Rittenhouse isn't even old enough to vote. Some of those edits were presumptuous. RobSFree Kyle! 15:41, 6 September 2020 (EDT)
Since many of those figures don't seem to be American, it wouldn't particularly seem accurate to add the Category:Pro Second Amendment category link to those pages, even if they were proponents of gun rights. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier's mother be all well! Sunday, 15:52, 6 September 2020 (EDT)
I never claimed Butina to be an American. And yes, I know she’s from Russia. Where did you get that I thought she was an American from? That doesn’t mean she’s not conservative, a patriot, or pro-Second Amendment though. (King Conservative (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2020 (EDT)King Conservative)
The Second Amendment is a subset of the concept of gun rights, but not the other way around. Unless gun rights activists in other countries express any particular support for the former, I wouldn't include the category link. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier's mother be all well! Sunday, 16:15, 6 September 2020 (EDT)
KC, Until such a time that we divide the category with a sub-category entitled, Category:American Patriots, and perhaps another entitled "Foreign Patriots", ferners don't belong there. And then to put ferners in "Patriots" is asking CP to take a partisan position on the internal affairs of foreign nations, which maybe CP editors aren't qualified or willing to do. For example, DNC operatives Alexandra Chalupa and Alexander Vindman regard Ukrainian Nazi Stepan Bandera as a "Patriot".
If you want to make yourself useful, why don't create Category:American Patriots and shift everybody there over to the new cat, then we can discuss how to handle alleged foreign patriots. RobSFree Kyle! 18:59, 14 September 2020 (EDT)
By the way, I believe this category link might be what's best for those pages you initially categorized. —LiberaltearsMay Dataclarifier's mother be all well! Sunday, 16:18, 6 September 2020 (EDT)

KingConservative, the United States Constitution applies to American citizens only; it does not apply to foreign nationals in another country. Karajou (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2020 (EDT)

If I could make a suggestion, could we make a category stating stuff like "People for the right to bear arms" specifically to take into account those who are not American yet still adhere to that exact view? Granted, it does lead to some... issues especially when a lot of leftists are surprisingly supportive of that notion (eg, Maximilien Robespierre), and have even used that "right" to cause untold carnage, but even still... Pokeria1 (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2020 (EDT)

Two questions

Hi Karajou, there are two things to ask: firstly, can you delete this spam page I put a speedy template on? Secondly, how come there doesn't seem to be a night mode on anymore? I noticed that user creation has been enabled for the time period usually not allowed; is there any specific reason for it? Thank you!
LiberaltearsMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Monday, 18:38, 14 September 2020 (EDT)

Many thanks

Many thanks for expanding the article on Thor Heyerdahl - it is appreciated. I see you marked your edit as a minor edit, but it looks quite a substantial edit to me. Carltonio (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2020 (EDT)