Difference between revisions of "User talk:KenRivers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(reply, final warning of blocking)
(Naming Policy: new section)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
"KenRivers", I meant what I said.  One more silly edit and your account will be blocked.  You're not fooling anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST)
 
"KenRivers", I meant what I said.  One more silly edit and your account will be blocked.  You're not fooling anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Naming Policy ==
 +
 +
The naming scheme is your first name plus your last initial.  ''Typically'', I leave full names alone (it's mostly about getting rid of clearly fake aliases). [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 21:57, 29 November 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 02:57, November 30, 2008

Let's see some intelligent edits, or your account will be blocked.--Aschlafly 21:33, 29 November 2008 (EST)

I was about to start editing Aschlafly, I was just curious to know on that occassion. I hope I have not offended you, and will begin some editing straight away. Godspeed.-KenRivers

"KenRivers", I meant what I said. One more silly edit and your account will be blocked. You're not fooling anyone here.--Aschlafly 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST)

Naming Policy

The naming scheme is your first name plus your last initial. Typically, I leave full names alone (it's mostly about getting rid of clearly fake aliases). - Rod Weathers 21:57, 29 November 2008 (EST)