Difference between revisions of "User talk:KenRivers"
From Conservapedia
(reply, final warning of blocking) |
RodWeathers (Talk | contribs) (→Naming Policy: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"KenRivers", I meant what I said. One more silly edit and your account will be blocked. You're not fooling anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST) | "KenRivers", I meant what I said. One more silly edit and your account will be blocked. You're not fooling anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Naming Policy == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The naming scheme is your first name plus your last initial. ''Typically'', I leave full names alone (it's mostly about getting rid of clearly fake aliases). [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 21:57, 29 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:57, November 30, 2008
Let's see some intelligent edits, or your account will be blocked.--Aschlafly 21:33, 29 November 2008 (EST)
I was about to start editing Aschlafly, I was just curious to know on that occassion. I hope I have not offended you, and will begin some editing straight away. Godspeed.-KenRivers
"KenRivers", I meant what I said. One more silly edit and your account will be blocked. You're not fooling anyone here.--Aschlafly 21:46, 29 November 2008 (EST)
Naming Policy
The naming scheme is your first name plus your last initial. Typically, I leave full names alone (it's mostly about getting rid of clearly fake aliases). - Rod Weathers 21:57, 29 November 2008 (EST)
