User talk:LanthanumK/Wikipedia contrast
Interesting commentary, but it might prioritize the issues. How about this:
Wikipedia: sometimes the worst of the public.
Conservapedia: the best of the public.
Wikipedia: pretending to be unbiased when it isn't.
Conservapedia: says what it is, and doesn't try to fool anyone.
Wikipedia: a poor educational resource.
Conservapedia: a superb educational resource.
Wikipedia: like the National Enquirer, and visitors aren't enriched by the experience.
Conaervapedia: like the Bible, and visitors are enriched by the experience.