Difference between revisions of "User talk:MatthewHopkins"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Terrorists--round two)
(Terrorists--round three)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Sorry, but that last is not acceptable either--about "pathological hatred." If you think that the other person's mind is closed, fine--so say that, without laying it on quite so thick.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 11:34, 2 February 2008 (EST)
 
Sorry, but that last is not acceptable either--about "pathological hatred." If you think that the other person's mind is closed, fine--so say that, without laying it on quite so thick.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 11:34, 2 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Terrorists--round three ==
 +
 +
Opinions about the subject at hand are one thing.
 +
 +
What you left there was a personal attack--and worse yet, a personal attack on the founder and ranking administrator. You know better than to suppose that the administration would allow that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 11:40, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 11:40, 2 February 2008

Hi and edits

Welcome to CP. And of course no worries about editing Stasi :) It's a wiki and I try to avoid asserting page ownership :P Thanks for the link, btw. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 06:55, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Cheers, Fox MatthewHopkins 08:57, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Talk:Main_Page#Terrorists

Your vain speculation on Andy Schlafly's prior history has no place here. That will be quite enough. If you persist, I'll let you guess the sanction.--TerryHTalk 11:16, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Terrorists--round two

Sorry, but that last is not acceptable either--about "pathological hatred." If you think that the other person's mind is closed, fine--so say that, without laying it on quite so thick.--TerryHTalk 11:34, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Terrorists--round three

Opinions about the subject at hand are one thing.

What you left there was a personal attack--and worse yet, a personal attack on the founder and ranking administrator. You know better than to suppose that the administration would allow that.--TerryHTalk 11:40, 2 February 2008 (EST)