Difference between revisions of "User talk:NotALiberal/Evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Proposed Replacement Evolution Article)
(Proposed Replacement Evolution Article)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Proposed Replacement Evolution Article==
 
==Proposed Replacement Evolution Article==
  
The current article on [[Evolution]] is a disgrace and simply is beyond fixing. In a typical community edited encyclopedia, real discussion and debate can lead to consensus and that can lead to a better article. This is not the case with [[Evolution]]. One user is given total reign over the article and it has become a monster every Conservative should be ashamed of. ([http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution&action=history| History of Evolution] notice how many users get to make edits)  
+
The current article on [[Evolution]] is a disgrace and simply is beyond fixing. In a typical community edited encyclopedia, real discussion and debate can lead to consensus and that can lead to a better article. This is not the case with [[Evolution]]. One user is given total reign over the article and it has become a monster every Conservative should be ashamed of. ([http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution&action=history | History of Evolution] notice how many users get to make edits)  
  
 
Here are the most immediate problems with the article
 
Here are the most immediate problems with the article

Revision as of 20:07, 3 February 2009

Proposed Replacement Evolution Article

The current article on Evolution is a disgrace and simply is beyond fixing. In a typical community edited encyclopedia, real discussion and debate can lead to consensus and that can lead to a better article. This is not the case with Evolution. One user is given total reign over the article and it has become a monster every Conservative should be ashamed of. (| History of Evolution notice how many users get to make edits)

Here are the most immediate problems with the article

  • Inexcusably failing to properly explain what Evolution actually is
  • Equating Evolution and Racism
  • Displaying an image of Hitler as the lead graphic (previously)

There are many other problems that will be summarized. This comment is a stub