Difference between revisions of "User talk:Republiproud"
Republiproud (Talk | contribs) (Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit) |
Republiproud (Talk | contribs) (Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I just wanted to use as more scholar sources and points of view as possible and make it better to the previous version written before my arrival on Conservapedia. I don't think there's need to delete also this version for a single piece, also because is my very first article written on Conservapedia, with Ken Akamatsu's only as the second one, I worked hard on both of them and I found great satisfaction and felt like I really contributed to something important, and here at Conservapedia I feel like in a community that I really belong. [[User:Republiproud]] | I just wanted to use as more scholar sources and points of view as possible and make it better to the previous version written before my arrival on Conservapedia. I don't think there's need to delete also this version for a single piece, also because is my very first article written on Conservapedia, with Ken Akamatsu's only as the second one, I worked hard on both of them and I found great satisfaction and felt like I really contributed to something important, and here at Conservapedia I feel like in a community that I really belong. [[User:Republiproud]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since I'm here, there's an issue I want to address. The site becomes off-edits to non-administrators from morning to the end of the first half of afternoon. I'm I the only one noticing and reporting this problem? Is it a technical issue? [[User:Republiproud]] | ||
Revision as of 21:01, August 10, 2022
There was nothing wrong with your bio. Another Admin deleted the page because of an obscene vandal attack. Sorry for the inconvenience. Is there something you wish to recover? RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 11:57, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
No thanks, but since I'm here, I wanted to apologize to you for the discussion we've had last time we talked, as I mentioned then I was already pretty tired and nervous. Sorry. User:Republiproud
- No problem. We've all been under stress lately. Let's hope Jesus returns before Michelle Obama appears as the Messiah in 2024. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 13:12, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
Can I remove the discussion from that talk page or it has to stay there? User:Republiproud
- We need to retain the record of discussions. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 15:27, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
Also, forgive this lack of mine, what's a Bacha bazi and an Orphan page? User:Republiproud
- An Orphan page is a page without internal links to it. A Bacha bazi is related to your citation of Tariq Rahman who you paraphrased saying that the term 'ephebophilia' "should be used in preference to 'homosexuality' for describing grown men's aesthetic and erotic interest in adolescent boys when classical literatures in Persian, Turkish or Urdu are under discussion." Can't say I agree with that language, but the corrupting influence of Bacha bazi played a part in America's defeat in the Afghan war. The Afghan "police" the U.S. recruited were a bunch of child molesters and homosexuals with boy sex-slaves, and the threat of the Taliban returning to power, which had previously outlawed the practice, made them co-operate while the Obama administration turned a blind eye, and encouraged, child rape and homosexual sex slavery. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 15:27, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
If that part creates a problem I can edit it out. User:Republiproud
- I'd leave it in. The concept needs to be developed. Such are the pitfalls one encounters in "nation building." RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 16:12, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
I just removed it leaving as explaination "Removal of possibly problematic part". I've read now the response. Did I do wrong? User:Republiproud
- I don't see where it's problematic. The idea has to be further developed as bacha bazi or ephebophilia as a current practice in many cultures. It can be done in several articles. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 16:25, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
So you want to restore it? Because you said you didn't like the language and I thought it was problematic. User:Republiproud
- Your Rahman scholar evidently is an apologist for the practice. This returns us to a discussion, as some argue, the person being penetrated is a homosexual, whereas the rapist is not gay. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 16:38, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
- Alternatively, we can just delete the whole article if you do not like the direction this concept is heading toward in Conservapedia. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 16:40, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
- In Conservapedia, we don't pretend to be "the sum total of human knowledge," despite Wikipedia's censorship, bias and propaganda. But what articles do exist require clarity and balance. Removing Rahman upsets that balance. RobSIch bin ein breakfast taco 16:47, August 10, 2022 (EDT)
I just wanted to use as more scholar sources and points of view as possible and make it better to the previous version written before my arrival on Conservapedia. I don't think there's need to delete also this version for a single piece, also because is my very first article written on Conservapedia, with Ken Akamatsu's only as the second one, I worked hard on both of them and I found great satisfaction and felt like I really contributed to something important, and here at Conservapedia I feel like in a community that I really belong. User:Republiproud
Since I'm here, there's an issue I want to address. The site becomes off-edits to non-administrators from morning to the end of the first half of afternoon. I'm I the only one noticing and reporting this problem? Is it a technical issue? User:Republiproud
