Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobSmith"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(You might like this video)
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 943: Line 943:
::::::When we talk about a rump state, ''What is a rump state?''  People will point to Serbia after the loss of its [[Kosovo]] province. But Poland is the rumpiest of rump states. It exceeds the UK since the UK lost its empire. It once was a Great Power stretching from the Baltic to Black Sea. It was, or considered itself, the leader of the Slavic world. Then it disappeared from the map for 125 years (this explains Eastern European, Polish, and Ukrainian anti-Semitism. They blamed Jewish immigration into the Pale of Settlement for the loss of power and destruction of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), So Poland historically has been Russia's chief rival as leader and chief protector of the Slavic world.  To keep NATO alive now in the 21st century, the most extreme Polish [[Russophobe]]s have been recruited and have taken over guiding NATO policy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 03:43, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
::::::When we talk about a rump state, ''What is a rump state?''  People will point to Serbia after the loss of its [[Kosovo]] province. But Poland is the rumpiest of rump states. It exceeds the UK since the UK lost its empire. It once was a Great Power stretching from the Baltic to Black Sea. It was, or considered itself, the leader of the Slavic world. Then it disappeared from the map for 125 years (this explains Eastern European, Polish, and Ukrainian anti-Semitism. They blamed Jewish immigration into the Pale of Settlement for the loss of power and destruction of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), So Poland historically has been Russia's chief rival as leader and chief protector of the Slavic world.  To keep NATO alive now in the 21st century, the most extreme Polish [[Russophobe]]s have been recruited and have taken over guiding NATO policy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 03:43, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
My interest in a greying Europe has waned as they are "a museum" as John Mearsheimer says. Most of the off-wiki work that I do that is influential affects the English-speaking world. I am also considering learning Spanish and found [https://verbalicity.com/how-long-does-it-take-to-learn-spanish/#:~:text=The%20bottom%20line,350%20hours%20of%20time%20spent. this great resource]. One of the organizations I work with would love for me to learn Spanish and it would open some doors for me.  I like Spanish culture and I already have some Spanish lessons under my belt.
America is the best bet for a country that remains influential for some time. And Hispanics are a growing influence in the USA. The future of Asia is a wildcard because China is so influential in Asia. Xi Jinpin is a dictator riding a tiger due to many things potentially going wrong in China due to a graying population, debt, and an economic slowdown with some unrest. China lit the fuse of growing expectations which is a factor that can add rocket fuel to revolutions. If people's expectations are not met, they get angry and may revolt. But right now, most Chinese are nationalists and at the present time they aren't anywhere near revolt. The Chinese may complain about lockdowns, etc.  But they are not going to revolt unless China experiences some bad economic times.  There is one thing going right for China and that is a Christian population that has been experiencing explosive growth. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:49, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
:By the way, Professor John Mearsheimer said that NATO/America is currently willing to fight Russia via this proxy war down to the last Ukrainian. And that Ukrainian nationalists are going to keep aggressively beating the war drums rather than seek peace with Russia. And Russia thinks the idea of losing this war is unthinkable. As a result, he thinks the end result might be that much of Ukraine is wrecked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:59, July 6, 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:59, July 6, 2022


Dec 2021

I've been trying to figure out how to work this one in, combining the Rittenhouse verdict and Fredogate with the subject of self-defense: ‘Says the guy who threatens to beat people up;. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:53, December 1, 2021 (EST)

Will look into it. I have to say that Cuomo wasn't that far lefty before 2016.| Good morning. Please caution on first image, not on an empty stomach.

(Oct/2000) wild mob Hamas cartoon condemning PA for rescuing the 2 Jews Dec-1-2021Telling (talk)

Done. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:14, December 2, 2021 (EST)
Real "victims" Smollet & Brooks LOL-

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollett-real-victim-attack-chicago-lawyer-argues | https://www.foxnews.com/us/waukesha-parade-suspect-darrell-brooks-jail-dehumanized-demonized-interview Telling (talk)

Looks like a developing, long-running storyline and narrative. Brooks apparently is the next Michael Brown of Ferguson fame. Brooks apparently was trying to surrender to the police (who were incompetently protecting minority citizens from a neighboring city) while fleeing a knife fight when his car accidentally lost control and killed six people. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:32, December 2, 2021 (EST)
Is woke-ism till in the "works" in "improving" this theory? Telling (talk)
Oh yes, definitely. These poor oppressed individuals Smollett & Brooks, in their desperate actions to fight for social justice, now face the white man's justice. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 21:13, December 2, 2021 (EST)

2 recent...Nov-29-21 |Nov-28-21Telling (talk)
Done. Sorry for the delay. I'm up to my ears in research on Faucism right now. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 22:26, December 4, 2021 (EST)
I got the lynching one, too. Also, my Skype account crashed and I haven't reloaded it yet, so I'm back on Slack for instant messaging. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:28, December 4, 2021 (EST)
I'm on there only once in a while. I hope you succeed with Skype etc.. This 2019 is classic, as both messages are on packages... Jihad and swastika...July/2019, Islamic Jihad w/ swastika in JudeaTelling (talk) 00:26, December 5, 2021 (EST)
Got it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:35, December 5, 2021 (EST)
Seen latest on Chris Cuomo?Telling (talk)
It'll be interesting to see where he lands. Maybe as Antfa's press spokesman. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:24, December 5, 2021 (EST)
This Chris Cuomo’s entire career was worth it for this one moment is epic.|Another topic, look at this woke Dem useful idiot fooled [3] the joke of the year.Telling (talk)
Dunno whether to laugh or cry. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 10:11, December 7, 2021 (EST)


Himmler to Mufti 1 (1943)|Himmler to Mufti 2 (1943)|Mufti's Muslim-SS Handschar|lying Rashida1|L.R.2, when you get a chance.Telling (talk)

All caught up now. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 10:29, December 7, 2021 (EST)
Thanks. Appreciated, especially that you're so busy. Can you grab a screenshot of this [4]?Telling (talk)
Done. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 14:20, December 8, 2021 (EST)
HI. I couldn't stop laughing. This is awesome https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1473079182980788226 Telling (talk) 21:03, December 20, 2021 (EST)
It's like Andrew Klavan said, we have to laugh our way through the fall of the republic. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 21:13, December 20, 2021 (EST)
Yup. For now. Till with the Grace of God it will all be improved.~~•
And God acts through people. This we have to realize and keep in mind. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 22:51, December 20, 2021 (EST)
Sure. Stay safe this holiday season. G'night.Telling (talk)


Hi. This one is shameful...Kimberlynn Happy New Year!Telling (talk) 00:18, December 27, 2021 (EST)

Yah, I saw this story, and it was so unbelievable, I wasn't sure which article it could be included in. This looks almost like cult behavior. [ https://conservapedia.com/File:Kimberlynn_Jurkowski.PNG] RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
You're right. Can you grab a screenshot where her name appears at WATKINS section? [5]Telling (talk)
How's this? I can crop it down to just the bottom half, if you want. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:13, December 27, 2021 (EST)
As always, you're doing great. | I made the distinction between WW2 era and today at antifa. I hope it's clear. As today it's a clear oxymoron. They always hide their twisted ideas under perceived nice "benign" titles.Telling (talk)
Yah, that Antifa article is pretty good as is, but it could use some reorganization, clarity, and updating. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:04, December 27, 2021 (EST)
Basically, it's too cramped. It needs some expansion. The original authors wrote it as if it was the final word on the subject, but much information and interest has developed since then. Perhaps dividing into eras, like pre-WWII, East German, evolution and change, late 20th century, Trump era, Biden era, etc.


Hi. When you get a chance: June 27, 2021. Little Palestine, Bay Ridge| Swastika on Park Slope school, Dec 13, 2020| Hate crime, little Palestine, Bay Ridge, Dec 28, 2021. Regards.Telling (talk)

Lie of the year

Can someone create a graphic per this:

LIE OF THE THE YEAR: ‘I Will Shut Down The Virus’

Biden's COVID-19 death count passes 400K

Andrew Stiles • December 23, 2021

More than 400,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 since President Joe Biden took office. Biden achieved the grim milestone despite repeatedly telling the American people that electing him president was the only way to "shut down the virus." That turned out to be an egregious lie.

The Washington Free Beacon projects that Biden's COVID-19 death toll will exceed that of his predecessor (408,450) by the end of the year, and will reach approximately 420,069 by the time he delivers his first State of the Union address.

Thanks.Telling (talk)

I've been on the lookout for a graphic, too. Maybe I can ask LT to do something with it.
Anther thing I've been looking for, which according to public and private agencies that keep such records and are often delayed months and years, is the number of illegal immigrant deaths, both in custody and out. Since it's been a record year of illegal immigration, it naturally follows that it must also have been a record year of illegal immigrant deaths, whether in custody, crossing the border, or trying to cross the border. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:17, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Since Biden invited illegals in, if a mother and child died of thirst in the Sonora desert 100 miles south of the border, or were murdered by cayotes for not paying a fee, those deaths can also be laid on Biden's doorstep. That's what Democrats call "compassion." RobSLet's Go Brandon!
What an interesting and such an important subject. You're so right. I'm sure there are so many unknown cases. 2,800 died between 2009-2019 [6]. Yet:
650 deaths on the US border.- Mexico EN 2021, according to organization 1:18 (CNN) - At least 650 people died when trying to cross the border between Mexico and the United States this year, more than any other year since an international body began documenting

[7]Telling (talk)

I've been studying this question for much of this year now, and it's hard to back up numbers with good sources, but I'd say 650 on the U.S side sounds very realistic (up from a 280 average over the past 10 years). And it cannot be conclusive, cause we have little or no idea what happens on the Mexican side, which has all the same qualifying factor to account. And the numbers of those forced into human trafficing and sexual slavery could be 10 times as high as what happens to an illegal once they reach the U.S. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:39, December 23, 2021 (EST)


Seen this?Telling (talk)

Yah, this deserves follow up and adding to her bio. Dems are splitting between the "Normal Democrats" and Defunders right now, but Tlaib seems intent on keeping the Defund Police/End Bail/Abolish the Prison Industrial Complex movement alive upto the 2022 elections. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:38, November 27, 2021 (EST)


Qatari hypocrisy - cartoon in Chatlie Hebdo [8]. Thanks.Telling (talk)

New section

Hi. Good answer by McConnell. Regards. Thanks.Telling (talk)

AOC image

Hi Rob. img Caption - "You mean all those poor rockets won't even get a chance to land?" sourceTelling (talk)

Racism images

Hi Rob. This one relates to the image you uploaded days ago of Time100. The elkurd twins. img source | This one is about Arab Oakestinisbs" putting up nazi flags near their mosque in Beit Ummar in 2014. img source | This nazi flag was put up today by Arabs Palestinians in Beit Ummar and was removed by the IDF. img infoTelling (talk) 19:55, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

Ok, sorry, i forgot. You want the AOC image, too, right. RobSFree Kyle! 20:59, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
OK, got'em all. [9] RobSFree Kyle! 21:12, September 25, 2021 (EDT)


Another anti-Asian hate crime, and as usual, not by a MAGA guy...

image, source. Thanks Telling (talk)

Here you go. I got some theories why these tensions exist between Africans and Asians. I could never prove them to be true, but I think both groups being minorities, are hypersensitive around strangers. They have almost like a sixth sense. Members of one group can "give off vibes" of fear upon seeing a stranger, and the members of the other group are quick to read how receptive strangers are to them. These impressions can happen in a moment, without a word being spoken. And if the strangers receives "negative vibes", they can be quick to violence. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:19, March 15, 2022 (EDT)


Want to make "New Pages" lowercase as "New pages" (just to be consistent with the capitalization of the other common noun words in the sidebar list)? Patriotic Gamer (talk) 13:41, August 9, 2021 (EDT)

Yah. RobSFree Kyle! 02:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
I haven't seen changes take effect yet. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Kirby's Dream Land 2

Is it ok if you undelete this video game article too? I forgot to request it -- thank you Patriotic Gamer (talk) 08:37, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Files for deletion

Mind deleting:

Patriotic Gamer (talk) 13:16, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Hey, thanks. What a mess, huh? RobSFree Kyle! 16:28, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
Yeah I've noticed quite a bit of things needing cleanup around the wiki, including duplicate/low quality unused files. There's more state flags that I haven't listed yet. you forgot to delete File:Medal Music.jpg btw Patriotic Gamer (talk) 16:42, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. That Categorization scheme is all screwed up, so it's difficult to even round up what needs to be deleted. RobSFree Kyle! 16:46, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
Yeah, and I have to ask administrators about some of these because some are admin-protected so therefore cannot be tagged. I'll try and see if I can find more Patriotic Gamer (talk) 16:49, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
My guess is 11k of 22k Files are uncategorized. RobSFree Kyle! 16:51, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

Here's some more:

Patriotic Gamer (talk) 17:06, August 10, 2021 (EDT)

A couple of those still link to pages. 18:41, August 10, 2021 (EDT)
The DC flag one no longer does. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 11:11, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

Deleting short articles

Personally, I don't see any harm in short stubs: CP could work at least as a kind of dictionary. But I suppose it is a matter of taste. Just a request: could you check "what links here" before deleting a page? Thanks! --AugustO (talk) 09:24, August 11, 2021 (EDT)

Yah, that's what I've been doing, but a few might have slipped past. The problem right now is, much of these pages someone studiously compiled in Category:Dictionary are all orphans. And no one has bothered to de-orphan in 10 years. This is an object lesson for all editors: when you create a page, make sure you integrate the page into the whole wiki with a reverse link from at least one other page. Otherwise, it might eventually get deleted. RobSFree Kyle! 09:42, August 11, 2021 (EDT)


A couple of days ago, I looked up the list of administrators (to find someone to convince Andy on a mathematical subject): most of them have stopped contributing before 2012. Do you intend to delete all of their talk-pages and user-pages? Or is there a reason that you singled out User:Joaquin Martinez? It leaves lots of red links behind.... --AugustO (talk) 02:57, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

That was done on user request, I beleive. RobSFree Kyle! 03:09, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

More files for deletion

Patriotic Gamer (talk) 15:27, August 12, 2021 (EDT)

Thanks! I'll get on it with the next batch. RobSFree Kyle! 15:49, August 12, 2021 (EDT)
Connecticut's one hasn't been deleted yet (oversight?) and i provided a note for the Massachusetts flag. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 20:47, August 14, 2021 (EDT)
Yah it's on hold for now. RobSFree Kyle! 04:36, August 15, 2021 (EDT)

In the News

Please add to the Conservapedia headlines how Twitter has suspended Amrullah Saleh but not the Taliban[[10]].Bytemsbu (talk) 12:10, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
I dunno; what is the significnce? Big Tech and Twitter have been working against America and for the Taliban for years now already. 12:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
Don't you think Biden colluding with Russia is a bigger story? [11] RobSFree Kyle! 12:25, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
Well I think it is important given how Amrullah Saleh is the leader of Afghanistan.Bytemsbu (talk) 12:57, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
(a) never heard of him (b) is there a single leader? (c) I thought it was Mullah Baradar. You're not falling for CCP/Big Tech/MSM agitprop to confuse people and take the focus off real issues, are you? RobSFree Kyle! 13:18, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
Baradar is the head of the Taliban not the legitimate Afghan government. But if you feel there are issues more important than this then you don't need to put it. Bytemsbu (talk) 13:31, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
"legitimate government?" Wow. Wow. And again I say wow. Talk about putting the barndoor before the horse.... RobSFree Kyle! 13:48, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
Did I hear you right? Are you referring to a group that shoots women in the street for not wearing burqas, as "legitimate"? Maybe in Twitter world, Anthony Blinken, Joe Biden, a host of Democrats and MSM, but not in the real universe that I personally was born into, or the real universe that God created. RobSFree Kyle! 14:05, August 19, 2021 (EDT)
My sources say, "Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani has already relinquished power to an interim government led by Taliban commander Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar." What is significant here is, we don't have articles on either Amrullah Saleh or Mullah Baradar, before we go off half-cocked on MSM/Democrat/Biden junta/CCP fake news. RobSFree Kyle! 15:38, August 19, 2021 (EDT)

You're a liberal

Deletion of climate LIBRAL

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but idiots never hurt me. RobSFree Kyle! 20:12, August 21, 2021 (EDT)

A request

I don't think Conservapedia has in it's manual of style page info on not creating orphan pages.

Since orphan pages are not a good thing and you have mentioned how irritating they are to you, please update our manual of style page. Conservative (talk) 00:56, August 23, 2021 (EDT)

Ok, will do. it kinda goes hand in hand with categorizing, too. RobSFree Kyle! 01:11, August 23, 2021 (EDT)


For File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture.jpg, I made the mistake of downloading the direct history.house.gov version to upload rather than Wikimedia Common's improved version. However, if I upload a new cropped version with even a slightly different aspect ratio, everything will likely get messed up. Can you go to the file page and see if you can delete the current file version without deleting the page entirely? Correct me if I'm wrong, but there should be a way to do that in the timestamp table under "File history." Thanks! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 16:19, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

I see you deleted the file, which still works because I was able to upload a better version in its place successfully; however, was it impossible to only delete the file version without deleting the entire page, even though there was only one file revision? —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 16:31, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
(ec) I dunno if that fixed it. You may have to re-upload as File:Guy L. Moser bioguide picture2 or something. RobSFree Kyle! 16:32, September 25, 2021 (EDT)
Whoops, pardon my quick reply here which caused an edit conflict. So to clarify, my request was to avoid having to re-upload the file separately under another title. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 16:34, September 25, 2021 (EDT)

Vaccine mandates and a quote from a Clint Eastwood movie

Adolf Hitler was against vaccine mandates![1]
General George Washington ordered smallpox inoculations for all troops.[2]

"I have right to a lawYEEER!" - the killer Scorpio in the 1971 movie Dirty Harry which featured Clint Eastwood.[3]

Apparently, George Washington's troops didn't have ready access to legal counsel concerning their innoculations or they thought they had weak cases. Or consider this radical thought: His troops thought their responsibility to get vaccinated against smallpox trumped any potential right they had to not get vaccinated.
A quick note to conservative, Republican Donald Trump supporters who are against Covid-19 vaccines: Donald J. Trump launched Operation Warp Speed which helped cause Covid-19 vaccines be developed in a speedy fashion. Put that in your anti Covid-19 vaccine pipes and smoke it!

Donald Trump and Melania Trump were both vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine with no apparent catastrophic effects![4]

Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.[5] See also: Long haul Covid-19 - Mayo Clinic

For more information, please see: Coronavirus prevention, Covid-19 vaccines, treatments and general information
Yah, Hitler was against smoking, too. RobSFree Kyle! 04:10, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
(A) Donald Trump ordered a vaccine, not a genetic experiment. (B) mRNA experiments are not a vaccine. (C) The CDC changed the definition of vaccine in August 2021. (D) Dr. Anthony Fauci did not inform President Trump that SARS-CoV-2 was not a naturally occurring virus and was created in a laboratory at the time of President Trump's approval of Warp Speed. (E) We still await the arrival of a vaccine, and the results of the illegal genetic experiments. However, the science has become so politicized, it's impossible to put a timeframe on expectations. Simply because Trump was deceived by the CCP, WHO, and Dr. Fauci is your weakest argument to have confidence in genetic experiments carrying the misnomer of a vaccine. RobSFree Kyle! 04:48, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
(E) And your use of MSM & govt propaganda regarding George Washington is flawed. That was variolation, not vaccination. Variolation is taking material {scabs} directly from an infected person and infecting another person. Your cited source uses the word inoculation; the alleged covid vaccines fail to inoculate, witness breakthrough cases. A vaccine is the actual virus itself, measured out in doses to fit a person's age and body weight. The mRNA spiked protein is invented in a laboratory and is not a synthetic reproduction of the SARS CoV-19 virus. RobSFree Kyle! 07:19, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
I think we should largely agree to disagree.
I do know that you are incorrect about some basic facts.
For example, vaccines commonly are not 100% effective and thus have some breakthrough cases. "Even the measles vaccine, which is incredibly effective, fails to protect about 3 percent of vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine—hailed a medical miracle—was 80 percent to 90 percent effective at preventing paralysis caused by the polio virus. Breakthrough infections of flu are even more common. While the exact effectiveness of the flu vaccine fluctuates year-to-year, it ranges between 40 percent and 60 percent."[12]
In addition, even in the case of breakthrough cases of coronavirus, a person's morbidity rate will be lower than if they were not inoculated against the disease.Conservative (talk) 12:31, September 30, 2021 (EDT)
Well, we can resolve much of this by understanding what a vaccine is. Vaccines are measured doses of the virus itself to induce an immunological reaction. It should be obvious by now that covid so-called "vaccines" do no such thing. RobSFree Kyle! 14:33, September 30, 2021 (EDT)


Uighur Genocide Article

How do you propose that we start the article?Bytemsbu (talk) 20:26, October 3, 2021 (EDT)
Here's all the pages that use the term. In the China article, we have three different subsections that touch on it, China#East_Turkestan_.28Xinjiang.29, China#Uyghurs_and_Muslims, and China#Uyghur_genocide. I suggest we begin with the cite in footnote 183 from the Uyghur genocide subsection for the Intro, and consolidate information from the other two subsections to eliminate redundancy.
Also, after laying out the case for genocide in the main body, then include a second section on Forced labor and re-education, which technically may be considered a separate issue from genocide, and eventually can be made into a single article as well, with information collected in a Uyghur genocide page. RobSFree Kyle! 20:51, October 3, 2021 (EDT)
I named the article as East Turkestani genocide due to it including not just Uighurs but all Turkic peoples.Bytemsbu (talk) 21:16, October 3, 2021 (EDT)

Category move request

Hi RobSmith, can you please move Category:Old Guard (The South) to "Category:Old Republicans (The South)" without leaving a redirect? When I created the category, it had been a while since I read a hard cover of The End of Southern Exceptionalism, and now realizing that I can just access it via Google Books and even search for key terms, I likely confused the term used in the book with something else.

Thanks! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 22:43, October 29, 2021 (EDT)



Conservative Of The Year 2021


It starting to get close towards the end of the year. Should Conservapedia create the Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page? Also, I think it might be interesting if Conservapedia created a RINO Of The Year.--TheNewRight (talk) 14:22, November 4, 2021 (EDT)

I think there is a page already started, but I don't have a link yet. RobSFree Kyle! 01:44, November 5, 2021 (EDT)
The Conservative Of The Year, 2021 page does not appear to have been made yet. Could I be given permission to make the page?--TheNewRight (talk) 18:35, November 17, 2021 (EST)
Sure. Please pattern it after the previous year's pages with the appropriate catgorization, etc. If another already exists and found later, we can merge it. RobSFree Kyle! 18:38, November 17, 2021 (EST)
Could you give me the power to create new pages? I cannot create new pages.--TheNewRight (talk) 18:36, November 18, 2021 (EST)
Do you have SkipCapthca? RobSFree Kyle! 19:09, November 18, 2021 (EST)
I do not think I do.--TheNewRight (talk) 21:52, November 18, 2021 (EST)
Never mind I do have SkipCaptcha. How would I go about crating a page. I cannot figure out how to create one.--TheNewRight (talk) 21:54, November 18, 2021 (EST)
Do you know how to activate your user page? RobSFree Kyle! 21:56, November 18, 2021 (EST)
According to your contribs, you created this page right here. RobSFree Kyle! 22:00, November 18, 2021 (EST)
I was able to create the page! Thank you for your help!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)

Conservative is doxxing others

In this recent essay of his, the fifth point in that particular subsection is publicly revealing private information about others. Can you delete the essay, since I don't have deletion powers? Thanks. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 13:37, November 7, 2021 (EST)

Yah I saw. I initiated a private discussion. RobSFree Kyle! 15:04, November 7, 2021 (EST)
Shouldn't those types of inappropriate postings simply be nuked on the spot? It doesn't matter who inserts such information, as they should not be allowed to remain on the site, period. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 15:07, November 7, 2021 (EST)
Also, thanks for removing the link to the essay from MPR. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 15:08, November 7, 2021 (EST)
(ec) Yes, for registered users, but an Admin should be given the opportunity to correct the error. I did remove the link from MPR to the doxxing page. RobSFree Kyle! 15:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)
This reminds much of another unnamed former Admin: he just likes pressing buttons to nuke his enemies because he can and doesn't think before hand. RobSFree Kyle! 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
Conservative has demonstrated himself to continuously make inappropriate postings and often times stubbornly refuse to admit he's wrong. He's been given enough chances. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 15:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)
They think being an Admin is just a game of Space Invaders and they can nuke their opponents by pressing a button. This is why I advocated for bureaucrat powers to teach them the proper role of an Admin. RobSFree Kyle! 15:15, November 7, 2021 (EST

Trevor Noah

I think Trevor Noah is very famous liberal comedian. in article I showed his double standards for his views on police brutality in USA and South Africa. I wish you to show the article again, and thank you --Alex Kosh (talk) 16:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)

I recreated the page. It needs to be brought up to encyclopedic standards. RobSFree Kyle! 19:22, November 7, 2021 (EST)

Please delete the two revisions left by a recent vandal

Please hide the content, username and edit summaries for those diffs ASAP. Thanks. —LT(TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS) Friday, 21:59, November 18, 2021 (EST)

User:Conservative is more skilled at deleting whole talk pages like that than I am. I might leave it for him. RobSFree Kyle! 22:04, November 18, 2021 (EST)
I believe you've deleted revisions before. Don't administrator duties include the deletion of diffs left by inappropriate edits? —LT(TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS) Friday, 22:08, November 18, 2021 (EST)
I don't want to make the wrong deletion, and I believe he's more skilled at it. RobSFree Kyle! 22:12, November 18, 2021 (EST)
In case you haven't yet noticed, Conservative frivolously deletes perfectly fine diffs while declining to delete inappropriate revisions most of the time. Do you actually expect him to carry out administrator duties after all the times he's abused them? —LT(TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS) Friday, 22:15, November 18, 2021 (EST)
Someday we'll make you boss, and you can handle all these weighty decisions. RobSFree Kyle! 23:30, November 18, 2021 (EST)

Quick Question

Hey, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. I was wondering if you could tell me if I have the ability to apply files, such as pictures and such, to articles on here? I have tried a few times to add pictures to the pages I’ve already created. Also, how do you think I’m doing with making pages and editing? Thanks in advance and have a great Thanksgiving! -SteKelBry (talk) 14:45, November 23, 2021 (EST)

Place image upload requests here: Conservapedia:Image upload requests. As to editing, it looks pretty good, with the exception of uncited editorial comments such as these [13][14], which make you look like a subversive Democrat trying to play the race card. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:28, November 23, 2021 (EST)
Thanks, and my apologies for that. I’ve since learned that I shouldn’t submit personal opinions such as those. I hope I can put that mishap behind me so I can further contribute to Conservapedia. God Bless and Happy Thanksgiving! -SteKelBry (talk) 15:48, November 23, 2021 (EST)
Well, that's good to hear. Cuz even if you are or were a subversive Democrat, that tired old stale stuff gets pretty insulting after a while, as if we're too stupid to see it or notice it. You need to become more sophisticated in your use of dogwhistles and subversion. Good luck. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 16:05, November 23, 2021 (EST)

Another category move request

Hi RobSmith, can you please move Category:Half-Breeds to Category:Half-Breeds (Republican Party)? Thanks! —LT (The Old Right was right!) Friday, 14:55, November 26, 2021 (EST)

Please don't plagiarize my work

Pertaining to most of the block of text you added here, it appears you outright copy/pasted it from my Salongate article. —LT (The Old Right was right!) Sunday, 16:56, November 28, 2021 (EST)

By contributing information to Conservapedia, you irrevocably consent to the display, copying, reuse or editing of your information, edits and entries, with or without attribution. You agree to waive and indemnify this and all affiliated sponsors, editors, users, or sites from claims for liability resulting from use, by you, of the content contained herein. This is a binding legal document. By using this site you agree to be bound by it.
RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:01, November 28, 2021 (EST)
Even if CP allows it, plagiarizing is not a good practice. I don't think readers want to see the exact same block of text in multiple articles. Can you at least re-write it in your own words? —LT (The Old Right was right!) Sunday, 17:04, November 28, 2021 (EST)
Well, edit it then. As an Admin, you need to know these things.
Granted, the phrase "your information" may need to be amended, being that it may now have an ambiguous or diferent meaning (related to doxxing) that was not commonly or popularly known at the time that version of the policy was written. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:07, November 28, 2021 (EST)
And your understanding or use of the term "plagiarizing" is incorrect, given the copyright policy, which you have agreed to, nullifies making any such claim. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:11, November 28, 2021 (EST)
WP:OWN, or Ownership of content may be helpful before you employ such language as "my Salongate article." RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:17, November 28, 2021 (EST)
As I've said 10,000 times, being an Admin isn't about pressing buttons to nuke your enemies. It's about educating and helping users and Admins become better editors and Admins. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:21, November 28, 2021 (EST)
Let's take this tweet, for example, copypasted from Wikipedia and tweeted to Kamala Harris by Rose McGowan. I wrote most of that text (which now has minor edits), but have no claim of plagiarism or ownership of it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:32, November 28, 2021 (EST)

Please check your email

Thanks. —LT (The Old Right was right!) Monday, 23:23, November 28, 2021 (EST)

I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page

Rob, I made some improvements to Conservapedia's blocking policy page

You can see the changes at: Conservapedia:Blocking policy

Also, I made some minor improvements to this page: Conservapedia:Guidelines at the Conservapedia's blocking policy for editors of the wiki section.

Generally speaking, given human nature (see: Fall of man), wikis are more prone to heavy-handed blocking than to too lenient blocking. The Bible refers to the authoritarian aspect of human nature once people have power. For example, "But Jesus called them to Himself and said, 'You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.'" (Matthew 20:25-26). Conservative (talk) 06:57, November 29, 2021 (EST)

Main page right

As your request, I removed the main page right item. Conservative (talk) 02:06, December 2, 2021 (EST)

quick note

Do you reinstall Skype? Conservative (talk) 07:22, December 12, 2021 (EST)

yah, give it a try. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 07:24, December 12, 2021 (EST)
It says you are not online. Conservative (talk) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
Sign into Skype. Conservative (talk) 07:26, December 12, 2021 (EST)
Are you signed into Skype? Conservative (talk) 07:28, December 12, 2021 (EST)
I'm in as HJ. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 07:29, December 12, 2021 (EST)

Then call me. Conservative (talk) 07:31, December 12, 2021 (EST)

It says PM is not online. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 07:33, December 12, 2021 (EST)

Another Quick Question

Hi, Rob. Hope you’re doing well. Based on my contributions these past few months, do you think I have the qualities to be an Administrator on here one day? Hopefully soon, I can earn access to photo upload privileges so I won’t have to bug you about adding photos to the pages I create, haha. Thanks in advance and have a great Christmas. -SteKelBry (talk) 19:00, December 17, 2021 (EST)

Sorry, I have no say in that at all. Those decisions are made by the boss. It's probably been 10 years or more since a new Admin was created. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:07, December 17, 2021 (EST)

Kathy Hochul

Why do you add Satanists category to Kathy Hochul? --Alex Kosh (talk) 17:34, December 23, 2021 (EST)

I think the answer is in the two sentence text: "Hochul claims the coronavirus vaccine is from God and that people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’ to go out and spread the vaccine." (It's obvious this racist scumbag is speaking to what the atheist left consider superstitious God-fearing and God-believing African Americans in the traditional Marxist and Satanic sociopathic manipulation of Black voters). But you have a point; perhaps the Category should not have been created or perhaps the Category needs some discussion to keep it.
I would argue however, if the decision is to keep the Category, this crossing-the-line of separation of church and state by an elected official to manipulate vulnerable and oppressed people certainly qualifies as Satanic. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:45, December 23, 2021 (EST)
And we know for a fact the coronavirus is not from God, it came from God-hating Satanists and idolators like Anthony Fauci and the Chinese Communist Party. If that's not proof of another Satanic lie from the pit of hell by a white Democrat, what is? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:55, December 23, 2021 (EST)
people aren’t listening to God, so she needs them to be her ‘apostles’
Is Hochel, like Anthony Fauci, claiming to be God? or the Way, the Truth, and the Life? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Attaboy. Let it all out. ConwayIII (talk) 18:31, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Let's not lose focus, the question is over creating and keeping certain categories. On a more philosophical plane however, an agnostic certainly would have a measure of deniability for engaging in Satanic activities, whereas atheists, their cohorts and supporters are more less indefensible. Go ahead, please, try justifying an atheist and Satanic position to a God-fearing African American. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:53, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Hochel, in her own words, is belittling and mocking African Americas for believing in God and not accepting the gospel of Faucism. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:54, December 23, 2021 (EST)
We have the same phenomena in the UK, where the Archbishop of Canterbury said 'Jesus would take the vaccine'. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:01, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Defeating parodists by making them redundant is quite the flex, man. You wouldn't believe the amount of money Soros recently offered to try & get the band back together, but it was agreed round the table that your stuff just couldn't be topped. ConwayIII (talk) 20:19, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Truth is like the coronavirus, its spread cannot be stopped despite the best efforts of men. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:38, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Dang. God loves a trier, though, right? ConwayIII (talk) 21:29, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Too bad the J6 panel is illegal. The House Resolution that created it requires 13 members and 6 appoint by Kevin McCarthy, which never happened. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 21:35, December 23, 2021 (EST)
I dont agree with her vaccine policy, but sorry that doesnt make her a Satanist or even Atheist. I would like to see reliable sources instead of personal conclusions to prove that she is Satanist. --Alex Kosh (talk) 22:20, December 23, 2021 (EST)
It's her own words. If she's not claiming to be God herself, she engaged in some sickening racist pandering. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:21, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Wait wait wait. Is the argument now, "Sure, racism is bad, but it's not as bad as being a Satanist?" RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:23, December 23, 2021 (EST)
No I want to see reliable source prove that she is satanist. Blasphemy doesnt make her Satanist --Alex Kosh (talk) 23:41, December 23, 2021 (EST)
Blasphemy makes her a child of God? Racism makes here a child of God? (Blacks certainly would be interested in hearing that).
Unfortunately, God doesn't really provide neutral space for agnostics. That's purely a human construct. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:46, December 23, 2021 (EST)
N.Y. Governor Kathy Hochul’s “God” is Satan – Preaches at NYC Church and Proudly Displays the “Mark of the Beast”
Let's not leave it at that - let's dissect her words a little further....
"I prayed a lot to God during this time.

And you know what? God did answer our prayers. He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers, he made them come up with a vaccine.

That is from God to us. And we must say, “Thank you, God. Thank you.”

And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to to say “I’m vaccinated.”

All of you. Yes, I know you’re vaccinated. You’re the smart ones."
And how does God answer all this?
  • Pride goeth before destruction
  • He catcheth the crafty in their own craftiness
  • God has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise
I could go on... RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:03, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Maybe flattery works on liberals and Satanists, but to a child of God it's a red flag. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Then we have to consider the fact that she spoke these words in the midst of the congregation.... RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Her pitch sounds a bit more like Pharoah calling upon Jannes and Jambres. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Please, don't take my judgement on the matter. Let's look at some of the 2,000+ comments on her words in Youtube (I know, I know, Youtube just hasn't gotten around to blocking them yet).
  • "God told me not to listen to false prophets. - 793 Likes
  • “Now let me tell you how God loves abortion.” Gov. Hochul. - 798 Likes
None of this is surprising, Democrat officials have mouthing this kinda Satanic BS for decades.
  • "It's so cringe worthy when self serving politicians invoke the name of god. - 790 Likes
  • Rob's comment: No, Donald Trump is not self serving. You miss the qualifier.
  • "This is what a cult leader sounds like. - 797 Likes
  • "Unbelievable level of evil. To stand in "church" and commit blasphemy. To promote a shot that is killing people worldwide. The audacity of these people is astounding. They WILL answer to God for their sins.
Yah, does she really listen to the voters? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:45, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Personally, when I hear someone like this talk, I can only scratch my head and say, "What the hell is wrong with people in New York to elect someone like this?" RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
What a way to burst onto the national scene. Does she, or any professional media consultant, think she can ever rescind this level of stupidity, ignorance, and outright insulting comments? Ever?
Maybe this crap flies in New York, but name one, just one, New York politician between FDR & Trump who made it on the national scene? And the reason for that is, New Yorkers consider people like Hochel, AOC, Schumer, Nadler, Gillibrand, Cuomo, De Blasio etc etc etc as "leaders" and representatives of themselves. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I checked the link that you share but is also its personal conclusion not reliable source. What she said speaks her foolishness lower IQ, and she made big mistake for using religion to convince people to take the vaccine. but again that doesnt make her necessarily a Satanist. a Satanist mean worshiper of Satan, is there any proof that she worship Satan, I didnt see that. --Alex Kosh (talk) 22:21, December 24, 2021 (EST)-
No, you are dead wrong. Most servants of Satan are so deceived by the father of lies, they do not know they are serving Satan. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:35, December 24, 2021 (EST)
There are numerous examples, both from the bible and in everyday life to verify this. For example, what could be more Satanic than an atheist, many of whom deny that the spirit world and Satan exists? That proves the level of so-called "self-deception", which really is Satanic deception. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:38, December 24, 2021 (EST)
The Encyclopedias should rely on reliable sources, not personal conclusions. does the other administrators agree with that? --Alex Kosh (talk) 00:33, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Ask em. Personally, I can't think of a one that would defend a Satanist. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:41, December 25, 2021 (EST)
She supports abortion, doesn't she? I doubt anyone here in CP management thinks a child of God supports abortion (I could be wrong). And I doubt anyone thinks there's a grey area where one can be both. But I don't know. Anyways, it's a debate I wouldn't hesitate to engage in. You can always create a debate page on that subject, either Hochul individually or Debate:Can an abortion supporter also be a child of God? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:46, December 25, 2021 (EST)
What you need to realize here is, Hochul stepped into one big pile of doggie-doodoo with her stupid, off the cuff, Satanic remarks inside a church during a church service. And there is no way out for her other than repentance and baptism. And if it takes New York Democrats to wish Andrew Cuomo was back, so be it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:55, December 25, 2021 (EST)
For Abortion we can add Category:Abortion Advocates instead of Category:Satanists. and also if she support Abortion that doesnt make her Satanist. Satanist is big insult, We can't accuse anyone we don't like of being Satanic. and do you really think abortion supporter is Satanist?, maybe you dont many figures support abortion including the conservative ones like Tomi Lahren, Rudy Giuliani and Margaret Thatcher. president Trump formerly was supporter of abortion, is he former Satanist?. --Alex Kosh (talk) 19:29, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Satanism is an insult? I've never met the Satanist yet who wasn't proud of being in rebellion against God. Children of God are not afraid of the devil, they have been set free. Only sinners cower before the devil. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
OK so does Hochul ever stated she is Satanist? --Alex Kosh (talk) 23:39, December 25, 2021 (EST)
  • They speak lies to one another; They speak with flattering lips and a double heart. Ps. 12:2
  • with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. Rm. 3:13-15
I think it's obvious which side she's on. She spoke her words in church. She should have saved it for Don Lemon or NBC. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:59, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Now, we can break it down (for example, Their feet are swift to shed blood can be laid at the doorstep of her predecessor Andrew Cuomo and the nursing home crisis, and I don't know her involvement, but what is she doing to bring Cuomo and other conspirators to justice?) Their is no fear of God before their eyes - why did she speak such blasphemies before a the congregation in church? What interests me most is Whose mouth is full of cursing because this is a twofer related to flattery; she flatters her followers with you are the smart ones, while cursing the stupid unvaccinated. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:09, December 26, 2021 (EST)

I need reliable source to prove that she is Satanist, this is simple. if there are no source, so you should delete category from article --Alex Kosh (talk) 19:31, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Her sources are her own mouth. It's no different than Fauci claiming to be God ("I am Truth"). RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
I didnt saw any sources, I am only saw personal conclusions. --Alex Kosh (talk) 23:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
In sending out her 'apostles', she implies the unvaccinated are in rebellion against God, i.e. Satanists. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:27, December 26, 2021 (EST)
In order to prove what you are saying, you either have to bring a source that admits that she is a Satanist from her mouth, or another source that proves that she is performing Satanic rituals
Other than this, your words are nothing but personal conclusions and conspiracy theory and may harm the reputation of this encyclopedia. --Alex Kosh (talk) 01:05, December 27, 2021 (EST)
It's no big deal. Anyone in rebellion against God is a Satanist, which is the vast majority of people on planet earth. Only those in rebellion against God fear Satan, or think it's a big insult. It's not. Satan is who their boss is and who they serve. It is not even a case of outing a Satanist in the closet - by their works ye shall know them. Was Christ a liar when he said that? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:47, December 27, 2021 (EST)
"there’s people out there who aren’t listening to God and what God wants."
Now, there's people out there who aren't listening to Anthony Fauci, who claims to be God ("to attack me is to attack Truth"), and what Fauci wants. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 05:07, December 27, 2021 (EST)
I dont think Jesus asked you to add Satanist Category to Kathy Hochul article. again you are going too far by this stubbornness by bringing Bible verse. Bible didnt prove she is Satanist. also I dont think Jesus would like us to make assumptions to other people without reliable source even if they are our enemy. I dont like anyone to make assumption to me, I am also dont make any assumption to other people without reliable source. Assumption is a characteristic of liberals against their enemies (read Meena Harris story), but we must be better than them. --Alex Kosh (talk) 18:41, December 27, 2021 (EST)
I'm going too far? She's the one claiming the unvaccinated don't listen to her god, Dr. Fauci. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:44, December 27, 2021 (EST)
Before It's News: New York Governor Kathy Hochul is an Evil Satanic Witch, Who Claims to Speak For GOD and Says Vaccines Are a Gift From GOD. No, Not Unless it is the Faslse god Lucifer. Pure Blashemy- Truly Dispicable. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:46, December 27, 2021 (EST)

Russia is a place where one can have a good life, but they are still overcoming their past

Everyone once in a while, I watch a documentary. I watched this documentary: Love in Russia.

Russian society is traditional in some ways, but I am sure that 70+ years of godless communism has had its effect on society.

But people with Christian values are having kids and the irreligious/nonreligious are not, so things can gradually get better. Time will tell. I think in the next 12 years or so, there will be a global recession, so that will cause a lot of problems. Conservative (talk) 01:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)

I let a homeless lady from Russia stay at my place for about 2 weeks. I learned more about Russia.
The USA should try to have better relations with Russia. Trump tried to do this.
By the way, I bailed out of the documentary at the 30 minute point. It dealt with the 3% of Russian society that are freaks. Conservative (talk) 01:25, December 24, 2021 (EST)
So I watched the documentary all the way thru. These kids these days, wudayagonnado? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I don't know if you're familiar with Pelageya, probably one of the greatest vocalists alive today. She's sings Cossack (or Kazakh) warrior songs. This is nothing new, Russia has longtime (even in Czarist times) been a nation of widows and orphans, cause it is a warrior culture, having so many borders to defend, or absorbing so many smaller nations and tribes into it. Even Pelageya has no idea who her father is. So what the DW documentary reports really has not emerged since the collapse of USSR. The aftermath of WWII was just another time when Russia again was a nation of widows. And many of the songs Pelageya sings are about the warrior dying on the battlefield and thinking about his wife. Once you grasp these songs go back hundreds of years, you can get a great insight into Russian culture. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 07:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)

This is what I was referring to above

Alcoholism was a serious social problem in the former atheistic Soviet Union.[1] Between 1940 and 1980, this atheist state had the largest increase of the amount of alcohol usage in the developed world.[2]

It's too bad that Russia chose atheistic communism for so many decades. Conservative (talk) 01:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)

I have to admit, my appreciation and love of Russian society and culture has come a long way in the past 25-30 years. What went unreported in the West, it was the Church more than anything that caused the demise of Soviet Communism.
Despite what Soviet communism did to Russian culture - and you are absolutely correct the damage was serious and longlasting - IMO a typical Russian of average intelligence, education, and maybe even with fetal alcohol syndrome, is more objective and levelheaded in their understanding of culture, society, history the issues affecting the contemporary world than 90% of our "best educated" professors in the United States.
Bear in mind, nearly 40% of the Russian federation are Muslims - secular Muslims - and they wouldn't have it any other way. They supported Soviet Communism then, and Russian Democracy now, cause they don't want to live under Shariah law. And they have a higher birth rate than ethnic Russians. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:52, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Watch this 3 1/2 minute video. You don't need any translation or English subtitles to understand what is going on. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
a white boy is abusing his girlfriend on the streets of Moscow, and nobody reacts. The same couple do it again, only this time she wears a hijab {Islamic headscarf}, and Muslim men step up to protect her. It's not a religious thing, it's a culture phenomena in a multicultural society. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:01, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Putin does not drink and he works out two hours a day so that is good.[15] But he is a former KGB agent and Business Insider reports: "On Sunday, he sometimes prays and makes confession... Nonetheless, Russian officials close to the president stress that "his life is not that of a Christian," according to Newsweek."[16]
As long as the corrupt Putin is in office, Russia will stagnate. Leadership is by example. Russia has to overcome its demographic death spiral. And the heavy drinking and Russian men cheating on their wives is causing family problems. Apparently, Putin cheated on his wife. Conservative (talk) 03:15, December 24, 2021 (EST)
This debate has raged forever - I recall my teacher Bill Renzi saying many people believe Russia has to be governed by autocrats to keep it together, be it the Czars, Lenin, Stalin, or Brezhnev. It's too big and too diverse (Stalin's own son didn't speak Russian). Russia is not a single ethnicity, culture, religion or language. It is a "Union of Peoples" and has been since Czarist times.
Technically, no nation has been one ethnicity/culture at all short of Balkanization, so please don't use that as a reason to justify a communist stooge like Putin (especially when even the JBS-backed New American made clear he was still communist). Even France has had multiple ethnicities in there (Alsace was a germanophone-speaking region [in fact, one of the reasons why the Jacobins planned a genocide of that region before the guillotine was used on Robespierre is precisely BECAUSE of its german-speaking population], and there's hints at Napoleon and Robespierre being ethnically Sicilian and Irish, respectively). And Great Britain is composed of four ethnicities/cultures (Irish, Scottish, Welsh, and English). And don't get me started on America which is multicultural even WITHOUT the current diversity crap being forced unto us by leftists. Germany was similar, originally being composed of multiple different countries (Bavaria, Poland, Austria, Deutsch, among others). In fact, the entire POINT of being a nation is in fact a "Union of Peoples", so it's not exclusive to Russia. And for the record, while it might be true the Tsars were autocratic, at least they believed in God and NOT Socialism or anything like that, unlike Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, or, yes, even Putin. I appreciate Russian society pre-Lenin. Post-Lenin, it is garbage, even under Putin, who refuses to go back to the Tsar. Pokeria1 (talk) 12:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
The 'captive nations' have been set free. The rest remain part of the federation because they want to, given the alternative of being swallowed up by Islamic or Sinic culture, or other hostile neighbors. Russia has played a role in history similar to that of the British Empire, raising up peoples all over the planet to a level above what used to be call 'barbarism'. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
If that's the case, please explain why Putin's gunning to go to war and annex various nations? If I were him and I truly thought they should remain free, I wouldn't even bother trying to prep an invasion of them. Besides, don't you think the fact that actual right-wing/conservative sources like JBS/New American and outono claiming Putin's a communist should give you pause? It's not like I'm citing Time Magazine or any left-wing rags. And for the record, if he truly cared about getting rid of Communism, he'd make sure ALL of it is destroyed, make sure the populace has nothing but disgust, regarding of ethnicity and culture, make sure to fire all the KGB priests and if necessary even line them up to a wall and shoot them, and certainly tear down Marx's statue and Lenin's tomb. That's what I would have done as an anti-Communist, make sure Communism is extinct. Pokeria1 (talk) 15:57, December 24, 2021 (EST)
NATO provocation. You read too much CIA agitprop. NATO is supplying lethal weapons to Ukraine in the Donbass region, hence Putin and Russia are reacting. Whatever idiots in the Pentagon and CIA drum up this senseless bs need to be chastised forthwith. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 16:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Ah, first of all, JBS has been highly critical of the CIA, so it's not like they'd be pushing for the CIA's propaganda anyhow. Second of all, Putin was also funding the very same groups that George Soros is funding going by this article here as well as this article (and it's very obvious that they're not CIA either. Actually, while commentating on the state of other countries, they are primarily concerned with Spain first, and they spare no criticism of socialism in their own country, being as merciless in their criticisms of Spanish Socialists as they are of Putin, of Cuba, and of any socialist/Communist nation. And just as an FYI, they've been VERY critical of the EU as well, especially it's soft treatment of socialists. If anything, outono's been far more consistent in being anti-socialist than Putin EVER was.). Third of all, Putin as of now is ALLYING with China, meaning they're not even enemies at all, or rivals. You're making the same mistake that people in the 1930s did with Stalin and Hitler before their Molotov-Ribbentropp act. Pokeria1 (talk) 17:10, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I haven't read any of the JBS stuff on Putin, and if it's anything like how you characterize it, they are wrong, assuming you are characterizing is correctly. Russia harbors no aggressive intentions against anybody outside its borders. Russia, as always, is preoccupied with defending its immense borders (and possible hostile actors within its borders). As to Ukraine, if it thinks it's going to convert Sevastopol into a NATO naval base, think again. As Dana Carvey would say, Naga doit. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:06, December 24, 2021 (EST)
It's EXACTLY what they're saying. And BTW, it's not just JBS, it's plenty of other conservative sources as well. And BTW, did you know that Putin literally FUNNELED the Steele Dossier as well, aka the whole Russian Collusion thing? Don't take it from me, read it from Daniel Greenfield on Front Page Magazine: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/ And don't forget outono, they're critical of Putin, the EU, all the socialist actors around the world. Actually, with the information FPM provided among others, if you support Putin, you support the Russian Dossier. Pokeria1 (talk) 18:19, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Putin handed the Steele dossier to Peter Strzok and said, "Here, do something with it"? No, don't think so. That was the Hillary-Brennan-Comey-McCabe pipeline. Now, if you wanna discuss who handed it to the NYT, WaPo, etal, you're not going to find Putin there, either. The pipeline goes Hillary-Jake Sullivan-Isikoff etal. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:26, December 24, 2021 (EST)
He used a cutout. Of course Putin wouldn't directly order for or hand over those things, he's not stupid. Even Lenin avoided directly signing the death warrants that the Chekha carried out despite obviously encouraging it behind the scenes. Heck, if anything, Putin PAID those guys to spread that disinformation via Vincent Roberti and Putin's Gazprom lobbying group. Me? I'd fight against China AND Russia, heck, fight against any Communist country, even risk rendering the world to cinders just to ensure Communism's dead and God's iron fist is controlling the world alongside his son Jesus Christ. Pokeria1 (talk) 18:33, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I gitit I gitit. Hillary was just a stooge as was the whole corrupt Democrat machine and MSM. There were victimized by one of Putin's evil plots to take over the world. That, of course is why we have to put back these idiots and maintain them in power, to defend against the evil Putin. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I never said the Democrats or Hillary were victims of Putin. Actually, if anything, I'd argue they're ALLIES, aka, collaborators with Putin, not victims of any sort. And for the record, I don't support the Democrats, at all. Especially not the ones who pushed the dossier. If anything, the fact that the same guys who pushed the Russia Collusion narrative to oust Trump are getting paid by Putin proves that, no, if anything, THEY'RE the ones colluding with Putin. If ANYONE was a victim of Putin, it's Trump. And quite frankly, you're acting more like Lyn Wood when he ordered for people to not vote during the period between the election and Biden's "inauguration", which apparently resulted in those crypto-commies Jon Ossoff and Warnock being elected into office (that, and voter fraud). And for the record, Obama was allied with Putin even back then, as you can see here. Pokeria1 (talk) 19:29, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Congrats. It's only December 2021, and you figured out the Trump-Russia hoax is a hoax. I had it figured by December 2016, and provided the corroborating evidence by March 2017, two months before Comey got fired and Mueller was called in to coverup the scandal. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:34, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I already figured it out even earlier, like during March 2016. I knew Trump would never have colluded with Russia at all, that it was a hoax. Heck, despite my being autistic/aspergers with humor not being one of my strongest suits, even I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office. And the reason I knew that, is because Putin made no secret to wanting to restore Communism in Russia (I've already seen photos years back of Putin giving speeches in front of Soviet paraphanelia on Breitbart, BEFORE the 2016 election I should add, and posts on freerepublic making clear that he was pushing for a revitalization of Stalin). My mom also recognized that Trump couldn't have colluded with Putin either, even pointing out that Putin would have known what he was going to get regarding a good deal via Hillary Clinton and her Uranium deal. The only difference between you and me regarding the Trump-Russia Hoax is that I was firmly aware of Russia under Putin STILL being communist, while you are naively believing that they've given up on Communism despite even KGB defectors making it clear that they still hold on to Communism. And BTW, I pegged Russia as still being Communist as early as 2012 when I briefly saw in Dreams of my Father Karl Marx's statue being in Moscow, something that, had they genuinely given up on it, they would have torn it down like they did various Lenin and Stalin statues. Pokeria1 (talk) 19:40, December 24, 2021 (EST)
You're betraying yourself with the above posting. Let me count the ways. (a) "Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office." Trump never said or implied any such thing. You are repeating Democrat commie agitprop (meaning you do not understand anything about the issue). (b) Putin had no involvement in any way, shape, or form in the origins of the dossier. (c) The Trump-Russia hoax at no point ever was a foreign policy issue. It was purely, from origin and inception, domestic politic corruption. (d) You continue to imply that Vladimir Putin, and/or Communism, has something, anything, to do with Trump-Russia You are in fact mouthing DNC talking points at this point. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:51, December 24, 2021 (EST)
At this point, based on your posting above, I don't think you know or understand anything about what the scandal or crime was in the Trump-Russia hoax. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Trump-Russia has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. It was a hoax. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:56, December 24, 2021 (EST)
The origins of Trump-Russia can be traced back to (a) the long delays in investigating Hillary's emails; (b) the fact that James Comey, and not Loretta Lynch, held a press conference clearing Hillary. This should have raised eyebrows everywhere. (c) The Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting. These were all the clues in open source MSM that something was seriously wrong with the Obama DOJ. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:02, December 24, 2021 (EST)
That's actually what I was referring to. The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them (and the Blaze, the source of that, was on Trump's side, not the dossier's side. Same goes for Newsmax, which the democrat agitprop hates as well.). My dad watched the broadcast, BTW, and he recognized it as a joke. As far as the Trump-Russia collusion Hoax, let me remind you that Daniel Greenfield, in the link I provided to you above, specifically pointed out that ALL of the Democrats who claimed Trump engaged in collusion, ended up paid by Putin and his shell corporation, meaning they if ANYTHING were the ones colluding with Putin, and more importantly, that Putin was pushing the collusion hoax as well. And yes, ultimately, it DOES have to do with Russia as well. And BTW, if I were you, I'd dedicate full hatred to both China AND Russia, not to mention Cuba, Vietnam, Venezuela, and the like, any and all Communist countries, dedicate every waking hour to wiping out Communism across the globe, and replacing it with the governments they had prior to Communism's take over, bare minimum (in Russia's case, reinstitute the Tsar). I would NEVER side with a Communist, period. I'd fight ALL of them, even down to the last breath if I must, as God demands that I and others do, fight to the bitter end, not care if it results in our extinction as a result. God wants Communism dead above all else, to ensure his rule is NEVER challenged at all. Pokeria1 (talk) 20:20, December 24, 2021 (EST)
It was an inside job or "hack" in May 2016. In August, Trump jokingly invited Russia to clear their name from the false accusations that "Russia hacked the DNC", or that "WikiLeaks is a KGB front." (You still seem to think Russia had something to do with the "DNC hack". I suppose you think Julian Assange is a KGB agent, too).
Michael Sussmann, who was just indicted by John Durham, is the guy who initiated the DNC hack hoax. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:32, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Let's clarify the misleading narrative you began here: Trump's comments to "Russia" had nothing to do with Sussmann's DNC hack hoax - Trump was talking about recovering Hillary's emails, which Comey, McCabe, Strzok, and Lynch never prosecuted for destruction of U.S. government documents and mishandling of national security information. Be careful where you are going with DNC BS. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 20:37, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I never said anything about Russia having anything to do with the DNC hack at all. If anything, I specifically indicated that Donald Trump was joking on that front, in other words, that he trolled the MSM and Russia WASN'T responsible for the hack. But Russia DEFINTIELY had something to do with the Dossier, especially when all the principal actors of that dossier, from Pelosi to Schumer, conveniently got paid by one of Putin's shell corporations around the time of the pipeline thing, as Daniel Greenfield pointed out in that article. Also, Wikileaks is obviously not a KGB front (the KGB died with the Soviet Union), and aside from that, Julian Assange isn't even on the Russian payroll, but he is definitely a Marxist-Leninist. I WILL admit I probably mixed up the two events. My mistake on that front. But Putin being Communist has been backed up by Conservative/right wing sources who also have spent quite a few times condemning various communist deep state groups as well, including Ion Mihai Pacepa. Pokeria1 (talk) 21:09, December 24, 2021 (EST)
  • I could figure out Trump was joking when he said he could have the Russians investigate the hack to the DNC office.
  • The DNC servers got hacked and their emails disappeared. Trump, jokingly, stated that he could get Putin to help investigate the emails for them
Do you even pay attention to what you post, or do you just like trolling me? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 23:47, December 24, 2021 (EST)

And they certainly have a better national anthem than then we do - including the lyrics (click CC). RobSLet's Go Brandon! 05:22, December 24, 2021 (EST)
I think it is mostly due to Eastern Orthodox Christianity being more hierarchal than Protestant Christianity. Conservative (talk) 06:46, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Except for the 70 year captivity in the Soviet era, Russia never had a separation of church and state in its 1,000 year history. And still doesn't. Even in Soviet times the people (narodny) never accepted separation of church and state. What is odd, how Muslims are content to live under the Russian Orthodox rather than under Shariah theocracy. The Jews OTOH, have had big problems with it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 07:53, December 24, 2021 (EST)

Greenfield article

While the Greenfield article certainly is interesting and worthy of coverage in its own right, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the internal conspirators and law breakers involved in the Russia collusion hoax. These all are merely Democrat elected officials who spewed WaPo bullcrap. And the point of the article is, that while they were lying and deceiving the American electorate, they were also taking money from Russians. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)

Watch this video. It is very informative

Watch this video: Bad News: How Woke Media Undermines Democracy

It is very informative. Conservative (talk) 06:48, December 24, 2021 (EST)

Watched most of it last night. Will finish up today or tomorrow. How did they hold a symposium on this at Berkley without leftist Stormtroopers not burning the building down? Is it possible in 2021 for scholarship, discussion, and debate to still occur at leftist institutions? Makes me somewhat suspicious. She says, 'eight million people who voted for Obama also voted for Trump, so the idea Trump supporters are all racists is bs.' Better late than never. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 15:54, December 24, 2021 (EST)
Here is another excellent video on the book with multiple people giving their perspectives: How woke media undermines democracy: A book event with Batya Ungar-Sargon.
The videos confirmed what I thought all along which is the "golden rule". Namely, he who holds the gold rules. The left-leaning media caters to wealthy people on the left side of the spectrum because that maximizes advertising revenue. And the right-leaning media caters the wealthy right leaning wealthy people because that maximizes their advertising revenue. In addition, it is engagement that drives up revenue online so news stories are crafted to push people's buttons (like cause moral outrage). Conservative (talk) 17:04, December 24, 2021 (EST)
If it bleeds, it leads, as they say in the newspaper industry. People don't want stories about a newborn liter of puppies on the front page. In sales we say 'fear sells'. In fact, that is the secret of sales - the message is always negative. The two motivating factors to get people to part with their money is fear and greed. Fear that you may miss out on a deal or that your house will burn down with everybody in it if you don't buy, and greed - 'wouldn't you like to be the first one on your block to have one?'
So that's how you capture people's attention - fear and greed. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:14, December 24, 2021 (EST)
This explains the incessant race card, Dems have to scare the daylights out Blacks to keep them motivated to keep them voting. "The Klan is going to burn a cross on your yard!" Repubs have to recognize how powerful and effective this latent internal fear in Blacks is. So "racism", "white supremacy", "white privilege", "systemic racism" become buzzwords and phrases tossed around to great effect. Ignoring the impact it has, and why these are used, is not helpful, and can even fuel more of it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:13, December 24, 2021 (EST)
The point of the book/video is that white, liberal elites care more about racism than blacks/Latinos and have hyper concern about racism because it makes them feel morally superior. And that hyper anti-racism causes radical policies like defund the police which actually hurts blacks/Latinos. And that this hyper anti-racism is partly fueled by the media whose journalists/interns come from Ivy League schools where hyper, anti-racism is also fueled.
Meanwhile, these white, liberal elites want open borders which drive down wages for Anerican Blacks/Latinos and working class whites. And they fight school choice (which blacks/Latinos want) which would give Black/Latinos and working class whites better educations. And these same white, liberal elites pushed policies that shipped blue-collar jobs overseas which hurt working class Black/Latinos and working class whites. Conservative (talk) 00:06, December 25, 2021 (EST)
It's a quid pro quo: white liberals in politics and media spread alarm and fear among Blacks with, "boogeyman is gonna getcha," for which they hope to be rewarded with votes.
In 2020, the Democrats already knew the "cry wolf" effect is diminishing: and in fact provides us with evidence of voter fraud. While the percentage of Blacks voting Democrat continues to slip, all the fraud and ballot box stuffing occurred predominantly in black precincts. It's pathological: Democrats would have to cheat in black precincts with or without covid and mail-in ballots, if they hoped to win with declining numbers of blacks voting Democrat. Fortunately for them, they had enough of experienced ballot box stuffing teams in place already, and even were able to train new participants in how to do it in such a massive effort. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:23, December 25, 2021 (EST)

Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022

Alexa.com ending on May 1, 2022.[17]

Compete.com was retired previously.

It looks like Similarweb.com will be the only free major ranking of a website's traffic.

Similarweb.com is more reliable than Alexa, but it is updated less frequently. Conservative (talk) 00:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)

This means two things: (a) Amazon (and Bezos), which owns Alexa, will move it resources into another area to attack and try to destroy conservative websites: and (b) numerous startups (both black hat and white hat) will step up to try to fill the gap left by Alexa. So we'll have to go through a period of screening new startups beginning now. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:04, December 25, 2021 (EST)
In January/February, I will have access to a SEMRush.com subscription which ranks websites by web traffic. The public can see the rankings for the top 100 websites ranked by SEMRush.[18] Conservative (talk) 01:24, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Actually, the fact that Compete.com and Alexa.com disappeared/disappearing means there is not a lot of money in providing free rankings so the gap might not be filled. But there is not a gap since SimilarWeb.com still exists. Conservative (talk) 01:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Alexa's pretty big; they have to wait til March to fill out contracts for service that exist. They likely will take many of their clients with them into a new subscription service (under whatever name). Similarweb and SEMRush will pick up a lot. But the global market is sooo big, there will be a rush by small startups. It will not be unlike all the smaller competitors Twitter and YouTube have. And they'll offer free service to attract new customers. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:37, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Alexa is so big, it feels it has gathered enough knowledge about how the business works (and have gathered the best customers) they can squash any competitors and starts ups. But one or two small startups will survive in the long run.
Also, Alexa feels the market has reached a saturation point to where the prospects for future growth do not require them to offer free service. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:42, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Anyways, this explains why their free ranking service has gone haywire over the past 9 months - they didn't want any new customers. It would only require them to hire more expert help to take on piddly-squat customers. Now they can concentrate their best employees on their best customers. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 01:52, December 25, 2021 (EST)

Actually, Alexa.com had a free service plus with a subscription, you could get more data. Both are disappearing in 2022.

Anyways, I have access to multiple tools that show a website's relative strength compared to other websites.

For example, here is some information from Ahrefs.com about Conservapedia:

Amount of domains linking to Conservapedia according to Ahrefs.com

The domain strength reflects both the quality/quantity of domains linking to Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 01:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)

No way is Alexa giving up the money from its subscription service. It is simply changing its name. If that were not true, the market to fill in the gap would be even more wide open. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 02:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
"Existing subscriptions will remain active until May 1, 2022 UTC. After that, customers will no longer have access to Alexa.com."[19]
In May of 2022, Alexa will end as a subscription service. Conservative (talk) 03:11, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Yes, the name Alexa. It's no different than when the NKVD changed its name to the KGB, or ACORN changed its name to dozens of other names in different states. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03:26, December 25, 2021 (EST)
There is no way they will walk away from the revenue stream they built over 25 years. And even if they did, the people they fired will start up a new business and reclaim the lost customers. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03:28, December 25, 2021 (EST)
They will walk away from a revenue if the opportunity cost warrants it. It comes down to return on investment (ROI). If a higher ROI can be had elsewhere, Alexa's subscribers will be abandoned. Conservative (talk) 03:43, December 25, 2021 (EST)
Amazon purchased the company for $250 millilon in 1996; it made $6 million last year. So yah, it looks like a loser. So they shut it down and write off the losses (which go against income of Amazon). But nobody walks away from the $6 million revenue stream they built up, and the knowledge of the industry they created (at such a cost). So it gets reorganized. Some employees get transferred, others go off and create a new company with their knowledge base and existing client list. Now, the relationship of the new company to Amazon is different question; Bezos may be just a stockholder in the new company - apart from Amazon (or other executives buy stock or make loans to their former employees).
Bottomline, if it is not an opportunity for the existing hands-on employees with knowledge and the client list, it is an opportunity for others to gross $6 million a year. The demand from the existing clients will not disappear with Alexa. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03:56, December 25, 2021 (EST)

Can you please check your email?

Thanks. —LT (The Old Right was right!) Monday, 22:20, December 26, 2021 (EST)

Hi Rob. This is Nishant Xavier

Hi Rob. How are you? This is Nishant. I'm back now and am in the process of writing a Book on how we can distribute Crores (10s of Millions) of Bibles to the Masses in India. I want to complete the Conservapedia Bible Project Translation. I like it: https://conservapedia.com/Matthew_1-9_(Translated) But I have a question. Why is "He" and "His" etc not Capitalized when referring to Lord Jesus Christ? It should be imho, as He is King of Kings. NishantXavierFor Christ the King 17:07, February 1, 2022 (EST)

Welcome back. Good to hear from you. I know User:Liberaltears was anxious to talk with you about a few things. As to the CBP, I'm not certain what the answer is cause I've not been involved in the Project. However, my guess would be that some editors deem capitalizing "He" as somewhat archaic, although I can't say for sure. Anyways, welcome back. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:17, February 1, 2022 (EST)

Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts

Uh, do you not want any rebuttals against the arguments used to disprove its existence? - SmashCulturalMarxism 2-8-22

Huh, what? you mean Marxists claim it doesn't exist? Figures. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:03, February 8, 2022 (EST)

Can’t imagine why that would be the case. In any event, it would probably be useful to display the arguments used to claim it’s a conspiracy theory before said arguments are picked apart by the facts. Do you agree? - SmashCulturalMarxism 2-8-22

Please check your email

Please check your email. Conservative (talk) 16:43, February 13, 2022 (EST)

Check your email again. I responded. Conservative (talk) 19:12, February 13, 2022 (EST)
Check your email again. I responded another time. Conservative (talk) 19:24, February 13, 2022 (EST)

Cultural Marxism Criticism Reverts Pt 2

Rob, I thought we had an understanding. What are you doing? SmashCulturalMarxism 2-14-21

Understanding on what? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
FYI, if you think you're going to hijack the Cultural Marxism page so proponents of Cultural Marxism can call their critics 'anti-Semites', think again. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:21, February 14, 2022 (EST)

What do you mean ‘hijacked’? The criticism section is being expanded so that it can refute accusations of anti-semitism. How on earth do you end up misinterpreting all this? SmashCulturalMarxism 2-14-21

Where are the accusations coming from? Are they from a reputable or reliable source other than an extremist source? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:39, February 14, 2022 (EST)

The accusations are literally on wikipedia and any other leftist outlet trying to call it a myth. Are you seriously unaware of this? SmashCulturalMarxism 2-14-21

No, it's to be expected. As Wikipedia says, 'an extremist source can only be used about itself.' RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:15, February 14, 2022 (EST)
The purpose of our Cultural Marxism page is to describe what it is, not rehash debates and talking points among Marxists to being exposed. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:18, February 14, 2022 (EST)
Why would you consider what Marxists say about Cultural Marxism as credible? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:19, February 14, 2022 (EST)
The situation is no different than Marxist school boards that claim Critical Race Theory doesn't exist. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:28, February 14, 2022 (EST)

If you don’t want the marxist talking points to be shown and debunked then why do you even bother to have a criticism page pointing out why they think it’s fake? And why are you assuming that I think what they say is credible? SmashCulturalMarxism 2-14-21

(a) good question. It needs proofreading. (b) why do you insist on inserting Marxist propaganda? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:47, February 14, 2022 (EST)

Well while you’re ‘proofreading’ arguments literally made to refute marxist propaganda, do you mind not rushing to assumptions and actually realize that Im trying to help the article? SmashCulturalMarxism

Image uploading

Hello RobSmith! Could you help in uploading these two photos? For about two months no one answered me. I will be grateful for your help! Sincerely, Garik Avakian (talk) 02:58, February 28, 2022 (EST)

Okay, give me few minutes. Sorry for the delay. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03:09, February 28, 2022 (EST)
Okay, they are in the Upload log. Sorry for the long delay. I never did get the message from David. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 03
20, February 28, 2022 (EST)
Thank you very much for your help! Sincerely, Garik Avakian (talk) 13:19, March 1, 2022 (EST)

Ukraine and the Wuhan Lab

Hey, RobSmith.

I noticed that you recently added a section on the alleged bioweapon labs to the Ukraine article. With that in mind, I’m interested in knowing if your perspective on the Wuhan lab has changed. I’ve always been suspicious that it was actually our own government who released the virus and that China was framed, while you have always maintained that China was indeed the culprit. Again, has your perspective on the Wuhan lab changed?--Geopolitician (talk) 18:34, March 1, 2022 (EST)

No, not unless someone could show evidence of political collusion in addition scientific and commercial.
And of course you have the question of motive. Now, motives in the CCP and the US public and private commercial interest may be easy to theorize, the problem gets down to who however, in addition to evidence. So you're left with just a theory, and a pretty well unfounded one, at that. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 18:51, March 1, 2022 (EST)
In the case of the CCP, the political motivations are transparent: the Trump tariffs were about to take effect, the international organ harvesting Study was about to made public, and Trump stood a good chance of being re-elected.
In the case of Fauci, despite his promise to get rid of Trump on January 11, 2017 with a pandemic, when news came of the "leak", his first reaction was "oh goodie, more money for Pfizer". Then he got an email saying "but your fingerprints are all over it." So one would have to prove a larger political agenda between the Deep State and the CCP to deliberately exterminate millions of people and shrink the global economy. Difficult task, but not impossible, that maybe your children or grandchild may one day wish to tackle. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:04, March 1, 2022 (EST)
incidentally, they are not "alleged bioweapon labs" in Ukraine, they are bio weapon labs owned and operated by the DoD. The cover story is they are disposing of Soviet-era bio weapons, but we have strong evidence of ongoing research. It'll be interesting watch them being handed over to Russian forces, and what kinda English language documents the Russians will make public. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:13, March 1, 2022 (EST)
Now in the North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization#History, they got the marginal cost of killing people down to 29 cents per head with a deadly strain of Yellow fever distributed through mosquitos, but nukes remain your best bet with a marginal cost of 10-12 cents per head, last I heard (these estimates would have to be revised to include the cost of storage and maintenance of a nuke over 30 years or whatever timeframe). RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:28, March 1, 2022 (EST)
If Trump is to be criticized for anything, it's that he didn't listen to Pompeo or whoever who warned him, "they could release a bioweapon and cause a global pandemic before they ever pay a dime in tariffs, and you could be voted out." Somebody had to tell Trump that, but he dismissed as "they're just bluffing." Kinda like NATO idiots who think Putin is bluffing as they try to stir up nuclear war. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 19:44, March 1, 2022 (EST)


Hi. Here is her embarrassing reaction to an important question. [20] Image [21]Telling (talk)

Got it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 12:05, March 10, 2022 (EST)::Thanks. Photo credit seems to be NYPost.Telling (talk)
In the 1990s, when Sen. Moynihan was still alive, we used to talk about "the dumbing down of America." With Harris (and AOC) we've come full circle. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 14:26, March 10, 2022 (EST)

Frank James

NY Subway attacker (Apr.12.22) Frank James AKA Frank Whitaker - image source.Telling (talk)

Done. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 00:34, April 13, 2022 (EDT)

Re Mosque and Gaza

These are pics from Apr 15 and Apr 16 about the rioters' rocks at the Al Aqsa Mosque, ready to throw at police and at Jewish worshippers. 1 , 2.Telling (talk) 21:30, April 17, 2022 (EDT)

They're in the Upload Log. The rioters wearing shoes I found extremely interesting. Of course, our readers need more context about how disrespectful that is, and how it shows preplanning and intent. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 21:46, April 17, 2022 (EDT)
Indeed I inserted, that according to their own laws...etc.

See the pile of rocks at their mosque, cartoon, how they use Al Aqsa.Telling (talk) 12:16, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

Looks like they were preparing to commemorate George Floyd. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
You need these uploaded? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 13:15, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
yes, they called all 2020 rioters like in OR/WA as "protesters" of course. When you're able, have the time, please upload.Telling (talk) 13:52, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
Ok, got em. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 14:18, April 19, 2022 (EDT)


This [22] belonged to Sha's Kamamji, of Palestinian Islamic Jihad before he was eliminated in Jenin when he opened fire.Telling (talk) 09:51, April 19, 2022 (EDT)

Got it. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 13:13, April 19, 2022 (EDT)
Cheers.Telling (talk) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

Burning their own mosque

Hi. Can you get a screenshit from within this clip and upload it? This is today, when "Palestinian" Islamists throw Molotov cocktail ontebted against police and fall inside their holy" compound.Telling (talk) 09:21, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

How's this? RobSLet's Go Brandon! 11:37, April 20, 2022 (EDT)

Bytemsbu is wrong

You are tight. Bytemsbu is wrong, like on so many edits. It seems he has an anti Jewish agenda problem. Using "neo con" cover.Dianne3000 (talk)


Good morning. This one was hired in Feb 2022. Please upload, when can. Thanks.Telling (talk) 11:02, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

Done. RobSZ 12:33, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

I see you are still here.

What is going on with the war and stuff? --Yeschayi (talk) 14:21, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

Having failed to get Poland to start WWIII, NATO apparently has convinced Romania to do it with an attack on ethnic Russians in Transnistria and oil shipments by rail. RobSZ 14:48, April 26, 2022 (EDT)
I see. --Yeschayi (talk) 17:06, April 26, 2022 (EDT)

You claim to be a bastion of free speech but in Russia people can be sentenced for to 15 years in prison for peacefully protesting against the war, indeed even calling the invasion of Ukraine a war can land you in prison. How is that in anyway free speech? You also claim to be pro life but hundreds of children and thousands of other innocent victims have been killed, even murdered in The Ukraine, or were they all Nazis? I think it is far more simple than that. Putin helped Trump and Zelensky refused to too. You love Trump and hate Biden so all your morals go out of the window which means they were false morals to begin with.--Chewy Suarez (talk) 12:05, May 10, 2022 (EDT)

Thanks for that. Should I add you to the pro-Nazi column? RobSZ 12:09, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
How is condemning murder and restrictions of free speech pro Nazi? Those are against everything the Nazi's were about. You calling me pro Nazi is like calling User:Conservative pro atheism. How about the you address the murder/free speech/false moral issues I bought up rather then ask a sarcastic not even wrong question?--Chewy Suarez (talk) 12:38, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
Good question: How is condemning US complicity in the murder of Donbas civilians and children since 2014 and the Ministry of Truth pro Nazi? RobSZ 12:53, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
I have not once shown any support of what you claim while you have again and again supported the murder of Ukrainians.--Chewy Suarez (talk) 14:18, May 10, 2022 (EDT)
If you are not defending fascism, I don't understand why you came to my talk page. RobSZ 14:22, May 10, 2022 (EDT)

the reason is because their is no reason for them to be added in the first place —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] [[User talk:{{{1}}}|(talk)]]

The information appears valid about the shooting; the bomb threat would need more research, but preliminarily appears valid. RobSZ 23:43, May 23, 2022 (EDT)

Wikipedia (the article here, not the website itself)

Hello, I noticed that you protected the page Wikipedia. I know that some wikis have a protected edit request template, but I was unable to find one on this wiki. If one exists, it would be great if you could point me in its direction. My request is that under unbiased editor recruitment the phrase "extent,but its editor pool" be changed to "extend, but its editor pool" (fixing a typo). Thanks, MayGodBless (talk) 12:42, May 24, 2022 (EDT)

I unlocked the page. I don't think we have such a template, but I'll check. Anyways, sounds like a good idea though. Thanks! RobSZ 13:03, May 24, 2022 (EDT)
I will go ahead and make the template - I will leave a link here for you. It will populate a category that administrators can keep track of, in the same way that one might patrol recent changes. MayGodBless (talk) 14:26, May 24, 2022 (EDT)
ThanKs so much! This will be a big help! RobSZ 14:35, May 24, 2022 (EDT)

I found this info in the New England Journal of Medicine and at the Heritage Foundation website. I thought you might be interested

I found the below info in the New England Journal of Medicine. I thought you might be interested.

Current Causes of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States, New England Journal of Medicine, Letter to the editor, May 19, 2022, N Engl J Med 2022; 386:1955-1956, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2201761: "Although the new data are consistent with other evidence that firearm violence has increased during the Covid-19 pandemic, the reasons for the increase are unclear, and it cannot be assumed that firearm-related mortality will later revert to prepandemic levels."[23]

Between social isolation and the attendant higher suicidal rate and the post George Floyd higher crime and rioting rates, it would make sense that gun deaths would increase.

The Heritage Foundation gives supplementary data that is helpful in explaining the rise of young people's deaths by guns in their article: What the Media Doesn’t Want You To Know About 2020’s Record Murder Spike. Conservative (talk) 14:32, May 30, 2022 (EDT)

This guy breaks down the propaganda use of the headline in 3 or 4 minutes, using facts in the same Axios article used to explain what happened:
  • 95% are homicides or suicides (not accidents);
  • 65% is black-on-black children murdering black children;
  • 30% are suicides as a result of lockdowns;
  • white kids are still 4 times more likely to die in a car accident than black kids.
RobSZ 14:53, May 30, 2022 (EDT)
Axios has many good articles. They are the closest thing to a fairly nonpartisan news source in terms of Democrats/Republicans (But they lean slightly to the left). They focus on facts rather than mere opinions. Conservative (talk) 00:03, May 31, 2022 (EDT)


Hi. In May 1948, when the NYT still had some clarity... img. Thanks.Telling (talk)

Done. You know, that cartoon is interesting on several levels in its historical context. RobSZ 16:42, May 30, 2022 (EDT)
You are so correct. And it is also a shame how far and twisted the NYT has become since then...Telling (talk)


Could you please expand this article: 2000 Mules. And then do a few more MPR posts on it as you expand the article.

I would do it myself, but I have 3 off wiki projects to tackle this week. Conservative (talk) 16:40, June 6, 2022 (EDT)

Also, please have other articles at Conservapedia link to the 2000 Mules article so it is not an orphan article. Conservative (talk) 16:44, June 6, 2022 (EDT)
I haven't seen the movie and only know about it from reviews. But the internal links will be not be a problem. Will do what I can to get it expanded, but WWIII & Ukraine remains my top priority right now (It isn't til about 1 AM my time Ukraine news starts coming in, so my sleep schedule is all screwed up). RobSZ 16:54, June 6, 2022 (EDT)
Ok. Thanks. Conservative (talk) 17:44, June 6, 2022 (EDT)

False info

Hi. Three Christian employees were murdered in Malatya, Turkey in 2007, but not in 2009. (And also, 2 of them were Turkish Christians and 1 of them was a German Christian.) Can you correct the article, please? Thanks. - Andrewlee (talk) 23:43, June 7, 2022 (EDT)

Source? RobSZ 00:14, June 8, 2022 (EDT)
I unlocked the page for editing. RobSZ 00:17, June 8, 2022 (EDT)


Someone named PatriotGamer registered. It's a weird coincidence, and I can assure that it's not me. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 10:49, June 13, 2022 (EDT)

It's also a coincidence that I paid this site a visit today as well. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 11:07, June 13, 2022 (EDT)

The following article needs removed

Stub Template

I think this wiki needs a stub template, Just in case an article is short on information

I agree. It would clean up useless and dead weight pages, as well. RobSZ+ 01:41, June 18, 2022 (EDT)

Joni Ernst

Why you reverted my edits in Joni Ernst article, she is absolutely RINO. You are did same thing with Nancy Mace article, do you have ties with those individuals? --Alex Kosh (talk) 17:36, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

There is no problem with the rest of your edits on that page other than the misuse of categories. Remove the RINO category and you can restore the rest. I have served notice elsewhere about cracking down hard on the rampant misuse and abuse of Categorization in CP. Apparently you didn't get the memo. Sorry. RobSZ+ 17:39, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

What the thing that make a Republican a RINO? Do you have some standards for RINO politician? I would to know --Alex Kosh (talk) 18:05, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

It's not my intention to debate who or what is or isn't a RINO. But generally speaking, a RINO comes from a swing district who needs Democrat or non-aligned voters to get elected. The term RINO generally refers to the character of the district more than the ideology of a member who needs more than Republican voters to get elected.
A member's vote on a particular bill many times cannot be determinative of their ideological stance. For instance, in an election year, a member may vote for a law that is unpopular among their core base in the full knowledge the law will never withstand Supreme Court scrutiny, such as a red flag bill. They do so to avoid criticism and being hammered by opponents on an emotional issue in an election year. It is not an indication that they are a closet liberal of sorts, etc.
In short, the term "RINO" should be applied to voters and whole Congressional districts more often than it is, rather than being uniformly misapplied to candidates or office holders. The member ultimately is a representative of the voters of that district who knows and understands the thinking and feelings of the people in that district and indeed is representing them to get re-elected. RobSZ+ 18:40, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

OK Liz Cheney isnt from swing district but she vote as Democrat, while Yvette Herrell is from swing district but she is very conservative. So your standard dont applied to them --Alex Kosh (talk) 22:53, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

It certainly does. Cheney has no excuse other than an ideological bias. Harrell was defeated in her first bid in a stolen election. It's not really a swing district (trust me, I live in NM-1). RobSZ+ 23:29, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

Second thing Joni Ernst election isnt in 2022, its in 2026, its to long. So her vote to this bill is unjustified --Alex Kosh (talk) 23:00, June 23, 2022 (EDT)

Well, she doesn't want to take the heat. By 2026, there most likely will be a SCOTUS ruling. RobSZ+ 23:29, June 23, 2022 (EDT)
Now, if Ernst signed on as a sponsor to the bill, it would be a different matter. Voting for it simply is responding to pressure from voters and public opinion. RobSZ+ 23:30, June 23, 2022 (EDT)
One of the best examples here is the Violence Against Women Act, authored by Joe Biden. Everyone, including Biden himself, knew the law would never withstand a SCOTUS challenge. But it was concocted to get people on record voting one way or the other, and finally passed and was signed into law after Senators got sick of defending their opposition to it. In 2008, years after SCOTUS tossed it, Biden accused John McCain of being pro-violence against women, cause he was one of the few Senators who voted against it every time Biden was able to get it to the floor for a vote numerous times over many years. RobSZ+ 23:38, June 23, 2022 (EDT)
<Footnote on the Violence Against Women Act> It was anti-gun legislation, the theory being that some women were killed by guns, therefore guns falling under the interstate commerce clause made "violence against women" a federal issue. Of course if you were a male shot and killed by your wife or sweetheart, you'd just have to suck it up. You probably got what was coming to you anyway. RobSZ+ 23:44, June 23, 2022 (EDT)
Additional footnote: Tara Reade, Biden's MeToo accuser, came to work in Biden's office cause she heard Biden was a defender of women's rights (you'd think what he did to Anita Hill would have opened her eyes). This shows that even the college educated are not only uninformed, subject to being propagandized, and ignorant of constitutional processes, but how the sociopath Biden has exploited liberal media bias for decades and manipulated voters' emotions in partisan causes that he knows he'll lose in the end. RobSZ+ 14:57, June 25, 2022 (EDT)

The Southern Middle School Article

The page has no notability to be on Conservapedia, Can you delete it?

Yes, I Agree

Quick note

At a certain left-leaning website, I said that Obama was partly to blame for Roe vs. Wade being overturned. I argued that if he didn't elevate Hillary Clinton instead of making a clean break with the Clintons, Hillary might never have lost that winnable presidential election against Donald Trump who was a political novice who never ran for public office before. As you know, Trump helped put three pro-life judges into the Supreme Court. And Hillary Clinton ran a very poor presidential campaign and her time as a Secretary of State was not notable in terms of achievement.

It was unbearable for them to acknowledge how weak the Democrat Party is right now! And that Saint Obama made a big mistake! LOL! I also pointed out that Obama was not rallying to the defense of Joe Biden and saying what a great president he is.

I do hope that as time progresses, the Democrat Party becomes saner. In general, it's not healthy if a two-party system has a very weak competitor. If the Democrats wind up in the political wilderness for a time, it might sober them up. Conservative (talk) 17:30, June 27, 2022 (EDT)

I think most people are misreading the significance of the ruling; it is not a clean break against abortion. What it means is the debate now is only beginning. SCOTUS kept voters and elected officials out of the process for 50 years, and candidates could only give meaningless lip service one way or the other. Now the discussion begins. RobSZ+ 17:38, June 27, 2022 (EDT)

I didn't mean to derail your recent main page talk page post "Propaganda update"

I didn't mean to derail your recent main page talk page post Propaganda update with unrelated material relating to Putin and Russian history. In retrospect, I realize I did that.

While we have some differences on our views of Putin, Russia, Ukraine, the Ukraine/NATO vs. Russia War and Zelensky, we also agree on some matters. Regardless, it's not a good practice to derail conversations because the golden rule is to treat others the way you want to be treated. Conservative (talk) 03:44, July 3, 2022 (EDT)

I had a typo in my above message to you that I fixed. The word "detail" is supposed to be "derail". Conservative (talk) 12:29, July 3, 2022 (EDT)

No problem. These news organizations and think tanks have an agenda. All reporting has to conform to that agenda. Look at how the BBC reported Denisova's firing on May 31, 2022:
Ukraine reports 15,000 suspected war crimes.
Buried in the report in paragraph 11, it says
Ukraine's ombudsman for human rights, Lyudmila Denisova, was also sacked by Ukraine's parliament. She was criticised for not organising humanitarian corridors and facilitating prisoner exchanges, as well as her handling of alleged rape cases against Russian soldiers, according to local media reports.
Deutsche Welle reporting on the same incident headlines:
Why Ukraine's human rights chief Lyudmila Denisova was dismissed
He [her boss in the Parliament] also accuses her of having focused too much on media work, and on describing sexually motivated crimes in gratuitous detail as well as the raping of children in occupied territories. However, some of these accounts, he said, had not been verified, which had harmed Ukraine's reputation and distracted media attention from other, proven crimes and problems.[...] Many Ukrainian journalists and human rights activists were outraged when they read Denisova's detailed descriptions on her Facebook account. "Sexually motivated crimes during wartime are a tragedy, but they should not be the subject of a kind of 'chronicle of scandal'," an open letter penned by 140 activists, media professionals, lawyers, psycologists and other public figures stated.
In other words, she's a propagandist, not a human rights ombudsman.
The claims she made - in gratutitous detail - were unverified. But that didn't stop the BBC from reporting more bs. Like Trump-Russia, they don't want to walk back all the lies and false reporting. And like Trump-Russia, demonizing Vladimir Putin and Russia is at the heart of it. The two events are interrelated. And the lies come from the same cohorts. RobSZ+ 15:23, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
One of the ways that I earn my living gives me exposure to how politicians/governments and political players behave. As a result, I am very aware that NATO/US/UKraine/Russia/Putin/thinktanks/political consultants all have agendas. Conservative (talk) 15:44, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
Boris Johnson & the BBC were up to their necks in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. Then as Foreign Minister, he oversaw UK intelligence, so he knew all about his flunky, Sir Richard Dearlove's collusion with US CIA chief John Brennan to frame George Papadopoulos with Prof. Mifsud posing as Russian. It is Johnson the driving force behind the war. Johnson keeps telling Zelensky to fight, cause the American's are paying for it. Biden's just an idiot. Macron (France), Scholz (Germany), and Draghi (Italy) want a settlement. So the EU is divided, and Johnson is leading the pack for war which has killed as many Ukarainian soldiers now as the US lost in the Vietnam war. It's ridiculous to keep sending troops to their death in a cause they cannot possibly win. RobSZ+ 16:02, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
NATO and US & UK intelligence want to destroy the Russian Federation, and maybe even dismember it into 4 or 5 countries. (Why? Cause Russia has the most powerful conventional forces, ala WWI & WWII-style, on the planet. That's why you keep hearing talk about Russia being a threat to its neighbors.) The Maidan coup was the first step. It was at least two years in the making with a little help from Google and Silicon Valley (to train hackers to destabilize the society). The coup got NATO's foot in the door.
Then along came Donald Trump, who asked, "What do we need NATO for?" That was enough. He had to be destroyed. So John Brennan and Richard Dearlove set about their work. And they tried to kill two birds with one stone - demonize both Trump and Putin (you will recall, the US-orchestrated Maidan coup predates the Crimean Annexation - that was Putin's response to the illegal coup.) By demonizing Putin, that preps the American people for war with Russia.
The BBC toed the party line throughout the coup, the Trump-Russia hoax, and now.
In December 2016, a month after Trump was elected and weeks before he was inaugurated, Lindsey Graham told the Azov fighters, "2017 will be the year of offense," meaning the plans were in place. Only Trump disrupted the plan for war with Russia and delayed it 5 years. RobSZ+ 16:34, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
So the thinking in Washington and London is that Russia is old fashioned and outdated with massive reliance on conventional weapons to defend its 11 time zones. It has munitions plants to produce not only tanks & artillery, but ammunition, as well. The US & NATO closed all its factories and outsourced everything to China, and doesn't have skilled machinists to work in industrial plants either (Germany, which just fired up it coal plants, doesn't have the trained workforce to operate them).
It's an interesting viewpoint among our leaders, academics, and in think tanks; does relying on nukes & bioweapons rather than conventional armaments make you feel safer? But that's the march of progress. RobSZ+ 17:07, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
OK. For the most part, I am not paying attention to this war anymore. There are a lot of other more important priorities to me. I think this war is going to drag on and on and on. There were many mistakes made by leaders of various countries. And I think they are going to keep making big mistakes. I can pray about it though. The Bible says to pray for leaders. Conservative (talk) 23:38, July 3, 2022 (EDT)
Yes, I pray for the removal of Western leaders everyday. The progressive transition of American leaders from Washinton, Jefferson, Lincoln to Joe Biden is enough to disprove the theory of evolution. RobSZ+ 23:51, July 3, 2022 (EDT)

You might like this video

You might like this video: John Mearsheimer | The liberal international order. Conservative (talk) 00:37, July 6, 2022 (EDT)

Thanks. Actually, I've watched so much of this stuff, it keeps coming up on my autoplay.
Now remember Vladimir Posner's Columbia lecture about Putin? He explains very well how this 'liberal world order' applies to the Ruski mir. For 45 years, during the Cold War, the US preached about 'liberal democracy'. In 1991 the Russian people were willing to try it. 15 years later, the US overthrew the Ukrainian people's democratically elected president. As The Who said, We won't be fooled again. (Personally, I view the destruction of Ukrainian democracy to America's first racist black president, who considered them a bunch of white people so who really cares in the long run?) RobSZ+ 01:44, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
As Andrei Martynov said, Whatsoever is valuable in Western Civilization and worth keeping as it drowns in sodomy, militarism, personal, political, and societal corruption, will survive in Russian Civilization. (Toynbee, Huntington, and other civilizational historians have pointed out that civilizations have a limited life span. Of the 30+ civilizations that appeared on planet Earth, only 6 have survived into the 21st century. Review Huntington's chapter on Ukraine in Clash of Civilizations. The Donbas sits on what he describes as a "civilizational faultline".) RobSZ+ 01:59, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
Both China and Russia have big demographic problems in terms of graying populations which will cause their power to wane. Plus, China has a lot of debt. The USA is a great power, but it has a tremendous amount of national debt. Time will tell how this all plays out. If the USA has severe economic problems it would greatly affect the world economy.
I do remember Posner's talk. Cultures tend to change slow unless forced to change. The USA occupied Japan and Germany after the war. The USA did not want to occupy Russia and Russia did not want to be occupied. So I have my doubts that the Russian culture would have changed rapidly towards democracy on their own. Religion has a big effect on culture. The Eastern Orthodox Church is a very top down organization. Italy was greatly affected by the corrupt Vatican and they have gone from one corrupt government to another in rapid succession. Governments in Italy are like the soup de jour (I am exaggerating).Conservative (talk) 02:08, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
Yes, Ukraine does fall on a cultural/civilizational faultline. That is why it has Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine. If Russia keeps Eastern Ukraine, perhaps there will be less tremors. It is unfortunate that much of Eastern Ukraine is rubble. If I am not mistaken, John Mearsheimer predicted that Russia would wreck Ukraine if there was a threat of Ukraine joining NATO. And to a certain extent, a decent size chunk of Ukraine has been wrecked. Conservative (talk) 02:14, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
The Cold War really originated over France. The French taxpayer did more for the Nazi war effort to invade Russia than it ever did to defend itself. When Hitler blew his brains out in the bunker, it was French SS troops defending the bunker above ground (all the German troops had already been destroyed). History whitewashed these facts, awarded the enemies of the Soviet Union an occupation zone, a seat on the UN Security Council, and the Marshall Fund to rebuild a country that fought against the Soviet Union. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, there was no Marshall Fund to help it get back on its feet. Instead, Wall Street predators and oligarchs like Bill Browder bought up the country for about a nickel on the dollar as the people were subjected to 'shock treatment'.
Putin chased out all the foreign oligarchs and predators, for which they responded by paying DC think tanks label him a 'kleptocrat'. RobSZ+ 02:28, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
I had no idea that the SS Volunteer Sturmbrigade France existed. Politics makes strange bedfellows. As far as them defending Hitler's bunker, I don't have time to dig into that, but I am not disputing it. I am glad there was no Marshall plan for the Russians after the Cold War. As far Russian history and Putin, there is a history of corruption. Conservative (talk) 02:46, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
France's role in WWII has been thoroughly whitewashed. So a couple dozen resisters led by De Gaulle fled France, while millions of French taxpayers, industry, and the military establishment joined with Hitler to destroy the Soviet Union. This is the first big distortion taught to Americans - that WWII was the whole world against Germany. Nuh uh. WWII was every nation of Western Europe fighting against Soviet expansionism. The Russians since NATO's founding considered NATO the successor to the Third Reich. That sounds crazy to many Westerners, but now we have proof positive NATO supports Nazism (I just caught a news report that Melnick, the Nazi Ukrainian Ambassador to Germany, is being fired because the MSM can no longer hide his outspoken Nazi ideology from the German public). RobSZ+ 03:00, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
So the truth about France remains a critical issue in French politics, although the facts have been hidden from Americans since WWII. Marine LePen & her father represent the German collaborators of the Vichy regime, whereas the French left are a bunch of Soviet apologists. This remains the defining distinction between left and right in French politics. RobSZ+ 03:06, July 6, 2022 (EDT)
There's a few more things to say about France, for example De Gaulle tried to play the role of mediator and peacemaker by refusing to join NATO (Macron by advocating a negotiated settlement is trying to follow in De Gaulle's footsteps, whereas Boris paraphrases Churchill, "We'll have the Ukrainian proxies fight them on the beaches...etc."). It was De Gaulle who urged Nixon to settle with China and grant them diplomatic recognition.
But next comes Poland - the source of the anti-Russian extremism that guides NATO policy. I'm debating right now whether to write an Essay on the subject, or just add it the Polish History article, ot both.
When we talk about a rump state, What is a rump state? People will point to Serbia after the loss of its Kosovo province. But Poland is the rumpiest of rump states. It exceeds the UK since the UK lost its empire. It once was a Great Power stretching from the Baltic to Black Sea. It was, or considered itself, the leader of the Slavic world. Then it disappeared from the map for 125 years (this explains Eastern European, Polish, and Ukrainian anti-Semitism. They blamed Jewish immigration into the Pale of Settlement for the loss of power and destruction of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), So Poland historically has been Russia's chief rival as leader and chief protector of the Slavic world. To keep NATO alive now in the 21st century, the most extreme Polish Russophobes have been recruited and have taken over guiding NATO policy. RobSZ+ 03:43, July 6, 2022 (EDT)

My interest in a greying Europe has waned as they are "a museum" as John Mearsheimer says. Most of the off-wiki work that I do that is influential affects the English-speaking world. I am also considering learning Spanish and found this great resource. One of the organizations I work with would love for me to learn Spanish and it would open some doors for me. I like Spanish culture and I already have some Spanish lessons under my belt.

America is the best bet for a country that remains influential for some time. And Hispanics are a growing influence in the USA. The future of Asia is a wildcard because China is so influential in Asia. Xi Jinpin is a dictator riding a tiger due to many things potentially going wrong in China due to a graying population, debt, and an economic slowdown with some unrest. China lit the fuse of growing expectations which is a factor that can add rocket fuel to revolutions. If people's expectations are not met, they get angry and may revolt. But right now, most Chinese are nationalists and at the present time they aren't anywhere near revolt. The Chinese may complain about lockdowns, etc. But they are not going to revolt unless China experiences some bad economic times. There is one thing going right for China and that is a Christian population that has been experiencing explosive growth. Conservative (talk) 04:49, July 6, 2022 (EDT)

By the way, Professor John Mearsheimer said that NATO/America is currently willing to fight Russia via this proxy war down to the last Ukrainian. And that Ukrainian nationalists are going to keep aggressively beating the war drums rather than seek peace with Russia. And Russia thinks the idea of losing this war is unthinkable. As a result, he thinks the end result might be that much of Ukraine is wrecked. Conservative (talk) 04:59, July 6, 2022 (EDT)