Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobertWDP"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Poi...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) like Wikipedia does, but rather a conservative, Christian, YEC one. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:42, 24 February 2009 (EST)
+
Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) like Wikipedia does, but rather a conservative, Christian, <s>YEC</s> one. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:42, 24 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 
 +
*Had to <small>(above strike)</small>, Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our ''emphasis'', insofar as religion goes. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 17:48, 24 February 2009

Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) like Wikipedia does, but rather a conservative, Christian, YEC one. --Economist 17:42, 24 February 2009 (EST)

  • Had to (above strike), Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our emphasis, insofar as religion goes. --₮K/Admin/Talk 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST)