Difference between revisions of "User talk:RonaldB"
From Conservapedia
(Re:) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You seem to be doing a good job, but bear in mind that the authority of an administrative assistant is limited. See [[Conservapedia:Administrators]], and pay special attention to the subsection for assistants. Wishing you many blessings, [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 00:26, 4 July 2017 (EDT) | You seem to be doing a good job, but bear in mind that the authority of an administrative assistant is limited. See [[Conservapedia:Administrators]], and pay special attention to the subsection for assistants. Wishing you many blessings, [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 00:26, 4 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
:Shalom, DMorris. I assume you're referring to my blocks of those with the frivolous usernames. I thought it was acceptable to block those with frivolous but not vulgar usernames so long as the option to create another account to comply with the username policy was available. Although, to be honest, most of the new accounts in the past two days have been the "page blanker guy" and JamesWilson socks. In any case, I suppose I'll heed your advice. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 09:02, 4 July 2017 (EDT) | :Shalom, DMorris. I assume you're referring to my blocks of those with the frivolous usernames. I thought it was acceptable to block those with frivolous but not vulgar usernames so long as the option to create another account to comply with the username policy was available. Although, to be honest, most of the new accounts in the past two days have been the "page blanker guy" and JamesWilson socks. In any case, I suppose I'll heed your advice. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 09:02, 4 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 02:14, July 6, 2017
Blocking
You seem to be doing a good job, but bear in mind that the authority of an administrative assistant is limited. See Conservapedia:Administrators, and pay special attention to the subsection for assistants. Wishing you many blessings, DMorris (talk) 00:26, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
- Shalom, DMorris. I assume you're referring to my blocks of those with the frivolous usernames. I thought it was acceptable to block those with frivolous but not vulgar usernames so long as the option to create another account to comply with the username policy was available. Although, to be honest, most of the new accounts in the past two days have been the "page blanker guy" and JamesWilson socks. In any case, I suppose I'll heed your advice. --Ronald (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
