User talk:Safety

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Like many English words, the meaning of "federalism" has changed over time. Hence the reversion of the outdated meaning.--Andy Schlafly 12:39, 2 November 2009 (EST)


Please make sure you're using a spellchecker before posting your articles. I think that many newer browsers have them built-in; I know that my version of FireFox does. I love that you've expanded on the sound article so much, but there were quite a few misspelled words. Just a friendly request. — Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:32, 9 November 2009 (EST)

Coase theorem

I don't understand your edit to Coase theorem, and you cite nothing to support it. Would you like to discuss on the talk page for it?--Andy Schlafly 19:50, 16 November 2009 (EST)

Essay:Non-nuclear return from the moon

Can we get a reply on that? JacobB 19:58, 17 November 2009 (EST)

The Style Manual

Safety, I encourage you to read our style manual before making further contributions. I believe you will find it very helpful! JacobB 02:14, 20 November 2009 (EST)


Please read the style manual, and stop adding liberal bias to the Bible, or you will be blocked. JacobB 16:05, 20 November 2009 (EST)

I read it. I'll study it. I hope answering you isn't against 90/10. In the bible paraphrase pages, if Luke 23:34 said "so" instead of "for" the statement wouldn't be conditional and would still be against them rioting. In my Apollo essay I think I was wrong. A letter from NASA said the propellent was mixed with oxigen but since there was no atmosphere, there was nothing to cause fire or smoke. The letter also said, the Apollo 10 lunar module started back at 13 miles, rather than trying to land, & successfully rose to the command module. :) --Safety 11:22, 25 November 2009 (EST)

System Redirects

Please don't make redirects for the system without first checking with the Admin who last edited the page. I am talking about the Index, where Duncan had made a redirect. Thanks. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 05:46, 27 November 2009 (EST)

OK--SafetyU|T|C 13:44, 27 November 2009 (EST)


Your "Help: Category" entry was most excellent! However, since you are obviously knowledgeable on this matter, might I suggest that you think about expanding the explanation? The why and how of doing what you suggest, as we have a high percentage of wiki novices here. Thanks. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 13:57, 28 November 2009 (EST)