Difference between revisions of "User talk:ScottDG"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Personnal Life)
(Personnal Life)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
::Is it supposed to be a joke ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:37, 22 January 2012 (EST)
 
::Is it supposed to be a joke ?--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:37, 22 January 2012 (EST)
 
:::I think he means that liberals often have issues about their personal lives ignored or defended by the media, so we often have to make out by covering info that isn't often seen. For conservatives, the media tends to constantly attack and bring up gossip. I'm not saying that Gingrich's personal life should not be covered here, but I don't think we should elaborate it to a great degree as it is not that relevant to his actual candidacy. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:00, 22 January 2012 (EST)
 
:::I think he means that liberals often have issues about their personal lives ignored or defended by the media, so we often have to make out by covering info that isn't often seen. For conservatives, the media tends to constantly attack and bring up gossip. I'm not saying that Gingrich's personal life should not be covered here, but I don't think we should elaborate it to a great degree as it is not that relevant to his actual candidacy. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:00, 22 January 2012 (EST)
 +
Nope. I mean that on Conservapedia, "liberals" is as much justification as you need to make any edit. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 23:02, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 22:02, 22 January 2012

An advocate of the Question evolution! campaign wrote:

"We have some great news to report! A person who loves the Question evolution! campaign has made the commitment to intensely promote the campaign. Hundreds of hours are going to be added to promote the campaign in the short term. He is going to relentlessly swing his Question evolution! axe at the rotten tree of evolutionism and nothing is going to distract him.

We already know that the evolutionists are impotent against the 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer so the widespread distribution of these questions is going to be very demoralizing to evolution supporters. Questioning, critical reasoning and open inquiry are toxic to evolutionary belief so we are very much looking forward to the widespread dissemination of the Question evolution! campaign."[1]

See: Responses to the Question evolution! campaign Conservative 08:19, 20 October 2011 (EDT)

Gingrich

Please show what I have added is incorrect before deleting. Thank you. --SharonW 21:31, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Personnal Life

I've seen that you reverted the personal life info added for Newt Gingrich because of "Gossip". Don't you think we should also remove all the gossip on democrats page as well? See Barack Hussein Obama#Early life or Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama or Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage or Hillary_Clinton#Reaction_to_Monica_Lewinsky_scandal ?--PhilipN 21:32, 22 January 2012 (EST)

nope. Because liberals. ScottDG 21:36, 22 January 2012 (EST)
Is it supposed to be a joke ?--PhilipN 21:37, 22 January 2012 (EST)
I think he means that liberals often have issues about their personal lives ignored or defended by the media, so we often have to make out by covering info that isn't often seen. For conservatives, the media tends to constantly attack and bring up gossip. I'm not saying that Gingrich's personal life should not be covered here, but I don't think we should elaborate it to a great degree as it is not that relevant to his actual candidacy. NickP 23:00, 22 January 2012 (EST)

Nope. I mean that on Conservapedia, "liberals" is as much justification as you need to make any edit. ScottDG 23:02, 22 January 2012 (EST)