Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sievert 81/drafts"
From Conservapedia
Sievert 81 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better? | Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better? | ||
:What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be [[individualism|individualist]]s, and not part of any organized [[collective]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST) | :What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be [[individualism|individualist]]s, and not part of any organized [[collective]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:33, December 5, 2020
Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better?
- What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be individualists, and not part of any organized collective. RobSFree Kyle! 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST)
