Difference between revisions of "User talk:Staple"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Liberal user category)
(Liberal user category: disgusted with your conduct)
Line 49: Line 49:
 
:Who is Richard? I just figured this site needs to show which editors are liberal and which are conservative.--'''<font color="#F5F5DC">Staple</font><sup><small>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]</small></sup>''' 22:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Who is Richard? I just figured this site needs to show which editors are liberal and which are conservative.--'''<font color="#F5F5DC">Staple</font><sup><small>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]</small></sup>''' 22:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::I appreciate the label! Thanks! [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 22:23, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::I appreciate the label! Thanks! [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 22:23, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
I would have added it myself, if it had been an act of free will. '''''HOWEVER''''', you have chosen to edit my user page.  Why did you not have the simple courtesy to mention the category on my talk page?  I consider this to be a grave breach of wikiquette. [[User:Human|Human]] 22:53, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:53, 27 April 2007

I think he means...

This? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harvard_abortion_study&diff=125203&oldid=125193 Andy will be on you if you reveal his pov for him. Flippin 13:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but I was changing opinion into fact. An article shouldn't have opinions. It should only have facts.--Staple 13:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

You forget you are on Conservapedia, not Wikipedia :P see Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?--CatWatcher 13:55, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but it is exactly that kind of double-talk, truth-telling gobbledygook that will get you into trouble around here. Mr. Andy doesn't want you to reveal what he thinks, he wants people to accept his opinion as fact. Now, stop being rational and get back to work. ;-) Flippin 13:57, 24 April 2007 (EDT) (At this point I'll turn off the sarcasm. Oh, and help yourself to a userbox on my page if you'd like. I offer them out like Halloween candy.)

Halloween candy makes me fat.--Staple 14:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

See you in 5

You silly monkey ;-) Flippin 14:01, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

  1. Flippin, be nice.
  2. Staple, don't fan the flames: [1] --Ed Poor 14:03, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
  • I just assumed that Aschlafly would want facts in his articles and not opinions.--Staple 14:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
    "Facts are stubborn things." [2] --Ed Poor 14:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Hey, meant no harm Staples. But the powersn that be don't like it when you point out that they not only have an agenda, but sometimes and axe that needs grinding. Tread lightly at first, then tell the truth. Flippin 14:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
  • "Facts are stubborn things." That statement is just someone's opinion. --Staple -Sysop 14:15, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Abortion Study

Activate email (and then email me) or catch me on IRC to get the study. ColinRtalk 14:10, 25 April 2007 (EDT)

Ok, just email me (click here) and I'll send you the study. IRC is Internet Relay Chat, which is similar to AIM, etc. 13:41, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

I appreciate your vote! Flippin 13:35, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Question

could you put the Aberdeen Football Club article in your soccer category? I would do it but i might mess up somehow.Bohdan

Nazi Flag

??? ColinRtalk 16:52, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Can't I add the image?--StapleYour comments are welcomed! 16:52, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

I see no reason why not. I was just curious as to why. ColinRtalk 16:54, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
My user page looked kind of bland and so I wanted to add an image. There weren't too many good ones to choose from so I picked the nazi flag.--StapleYour comments are welcomed! 16:55, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Fair enough. ColinRtalk 16:56, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Liberal user category

Careful adding it to pages, it will bring up memories of Richard. Tmtoulouse 22:18, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Who is Richard? I just figured this site needs to show which editors are liberal and which are conservative.--StapleYour comments are welcomed! 22:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
I appreciate the label! Thanks! GodlessLiberal 22:23, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

I would have added it myself, if it had been an act of free will. HOWEVER, you have chosen to edit my user page. Why did you not have the simple courtesy to mention the category on my talk page? I consider this to be a grave breach of wikiquette. Human 22:53, 27 April 2007 (EDT)