Difference between revisions of "User talk:VonShroom"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Warning)
m
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Well since Crocoite has yet to slap on a welcome template here, let me do the honours instead. As a fellow "liberal atheist" (although by American terms I am probably on a par with socialists in terms of political views), I am glad to see you here. My mission is very much similar to yours, I guess, in discovering new points of view. Right now I am working on the [[macroeconomics]] article if you fancy helping out on something strictly NPOV. See you around, I hope... --[[User:TJ|Crookles]] 17:41, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
Well since Crocoite has yet to slap on a welcome template here, let me do the honours instead. As a fellow "liberal atheist" (although by American terms I am probably on a par with socialists in terms of political views), I am glad to see you here. My mission is very much similar to yours, I guess, in discovering new points of view. Right now I am working on the [[macroeconomics]] article if you fancy helping out on something strictly NPOV. See you around, I hope... --[[User:TJ|Crookles]] 17:41, 3 March 2008 (EST)
  
==Warning==
+
A fellow monkey in the machine.  Good luck avoiding being sweeped into a generalization (I have already being classified as deceitful).  Here's to being the odd-men out. [[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 23:10, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Your edit [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ZTak&rcid=433276] is not appropriate and has been deleted. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 17:57, 5 March 2008 (EST)
+
 
 +
== meh ==
 +
 
 +
I had enough of him for the time being.
 +
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 22:18, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Asking Questions ==
 +
 
 +
Don't expect much when asking valid questions except being called a filthy liberal and suffering from liberal denial/hysteria/bias/deceit/germs/etc. I've tried. Oh lord how I have tried.
 +
<br />Good luck, though. Liberal On!--[[User:Iconoclastbeggar|Iconoclastbeggar]] 23:35, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== What exactly is "offensive?" ==
 +
 
 +
Since outright ad hominem attacks upon liberals is not allowed here, what exactly qualifies as an "offensive statement?" [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 12:46, 5 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:Well,the best example is this site's use of the phrase ''pro-abortion'' instead of ''pro-choice''.  I am NOT ''pro abortion'', and I am not familiar with ANYONE who considers themselves so.  This site only uses that phrase to make it seem like liberals enjoy killing babies, which is very classy.
 +
:Also, I wouldn't say that blatant attacks upon liberals are not allowed here; just look at the infamous [[professor values]] article. Is there a single conservative educator listed there? No. Can a conservative educator even be listed there? No, Schlafly personally reverts the addition. Apparently only liberal professors commit heinous acts. [[User:VonShroom|VonShroom]] 18:04, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:10, May 25, 2008

Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, VonShroom, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, VonShroom!


BrianCo 18:02, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Hello!

Well since Crocoite has yet to slap on a welcome template here, let me do the honours instead. As a fellow "liberal atheist" (although by American terms I am probably on a par with socialists in terms of political views), I am glad to see you here. My mission is very much similar to yours, I guess, in discovering new points of view. Right now I am working on the macroeconomics article if you fancy helping out on something strictly NPOV. See you around, I hope... --Crookles 17:41, 3 March 2008 (EST)

A fellow monkey in the machine. Good luck avoiding being sweeped into a generalization (I have already being classified as deceitful). Here's to being the odd-men out. Snotbowst 23:10, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

meh

I had enough of him for the time being. MetcalfeM 22:18, 13 March 2008 (EDT)


Asking Questions

Don't expect much when asking valid questions except being called a filthy liberal and suffering from liberal denial/hysteria/bias/deceit/germs/etc. I've tried. Oh lord how I have tried.
Good luck, though. Liberal On!--Iconoclastbeggar 23:35, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

What exactly is "offensive?"

Since outright ad hominem attacks upon liberals is not allowed here, what exactly qualifies as an "offensive statement?" Jinxmchue 12:46, 5 April 2008 (EDT)

Well,the best example is this site's use of the phrase pro-abortion instead of pro-choice. I am NOT pro abortion, and I am not familiar with ANYONE who considers themselves so. This site only uses that phrase to make it seem like liberals enjoy killing babies, which is very classy.
Also, I wouldn't say that blatant attacks upon liberals are not allowed here; just look at the infamous professor values article. Is there a single conservative educator listed there? No. Can a conservative educator even be listed there? No, Schlafly personally reverts the addition. Apparently only liberal professors commit heinous acts. VonShroom 18:04, 8 April 2008 (EDT)