I got skip captcha! I have a question: What is it? Is a virus? (Just a joke) I love proving I am not a robot as much as the next guy, but does this mean I have a certain, specific role in this wiki project? Let me know. - --CharlesShirley (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2021 (EST)
- Already did --User:Yeschayi (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2021 (EST)
I'm noticing that the addition you made to Windows 95 looks a lot like what Wikipedia has...did you write this text yourself, or did some of it come from other people on Wikipedia?
Thanks! --DavidB4 (TALK) 14:38, 18 January 2021 (EST)
- Its a placeholder, im writing the entire thing now, i'm using another tab to type this. --Yeschayi (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2021 (EST)
- What I meant is that i'm writing the entire article again. --Yeschayi (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2021 (EST)
Wildlife infobox heading
I reverted your edit to the Eurasian Blue Tit. What it did was to make the heading too wordy and weighty, so it was unnecessary. However, in the portion of the infobox labled "caption" I generally place a name / scientific name there, and usually if the image shows a specific subspecies, or if the article is of a group of species. Karajou (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2021 (EST)
- With regard to this particular bird, I have not been able to identify the subspecies. If you are able to do so, place the scientific name in the caption section. Karajou (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2021 (EST)
- Just confirming that I have received and read the message above. --Yeschayi ~ Talk (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2021 (EST)
Re: Why are you and rob fighting
In response to your question, I'll repost what I originally posted before Rob removed it under his false claim of "flaming":
This goes back to a post RobS left on my talk page last January that falsely accused me of "trolling", and when I confronted him about it and suggested that the link in that post had caused him to become irrational and go rogue, and I also removed that post in my talk page, he proceeded to unjustly block me on a dubious claim of "reverting a sysop warning" (which really was nothing more that him resorting to trolling me himself with that post), then he blocked me four more times after that for dubious and unjust reasons, such as for "undoing the actions of a sysop" (i.e. his hiding of comments made by another editor, Pokeria1, by putting a warning template around the comments to hide them and adding uncivil snark in his reasoning for hiding the comments because he did not like what Pokeria1 had to say, followed by my removal of the template to reveal the comments and make them known) and another false accusation of "trolling" for calling out what he was doing. Karajou subsequently unblocked me and called out what RobS was doing for what it is, an abuse of power. RobS also proceeded to make more false accusations against me and other posters in the time since and even denied (and continues to do so) what he did wrong and followed that with further incivility (which violates Conservapedia guidelines regarding civility) and snark on his part, which he continued with right up until Andy revoked his administration and sysop powers. That should bring context to the whole issue. Northwest (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2021 (EST)
Don't copy from Wikipedia
Re: Republic of Molossia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Molossia | It's classed as a Dictatorship ruled Micronation, it is notable and many people know what Molossia is, the only people living their are the so called "Baugh Clan", which is for people related by blood or marriage, it also has its own website: http://molossia.org/, they seem to get a decent amount of views per day from different countries, not just the USA. --Yeschayi (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2021 (EDT)
- Adding on to that, he claims thousands of people wanted citizenship in his micronation but he insists on keeping the "Baugh Clan" only. --Yeschayi (talk) 04:29, 17 April 2021 (EDT)
Friendly editor notice about a discussion
Hey Yeschayi. I just wanted to let you know I started a discussion about new content (Maybe a new article for it) about content on Wikipedia. You can see the discussion here: Conservapedia:Community Portal#Discussion for a possible new Wikipedia Article. I am letting the active editors know about the discussion. Feel free to drop your opinion in it! --Elijahandskip (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2021 (EDT)
We're trying to clean up some dead weight on the wiki which will help our search engine rankings and results. I noticed you have several uncategorized page creations. You might want to find the appropriate category for these pages so they don't get accidentally caught up in deletions. Thanks. RobSFree Kyle! 21:47, June 14, 2021 (EDT)
There seems to be some discussion about a page you created.  While no one has hung a formal Deletion tag on it, perhaps you can answer the questions about why the page was created. Thanks. RobSFree Kyle! 21:37, July 18, 2021 (EDT)
We're going on an anti-stub jihad, and uncategorized orphan pages like this  may become victim. You may want to categorize, de-orphan, and expand it with some outside links so it doesn't fall victim. Thanks. RobSFree Kyle! 02:15, August 11, 2021 (EDT)
Thank you for your contributions.
If you create new pages in the future, please put category tags on the them and don't have them be orphan pages. Also, Conservapedia recently updated its Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages page. I would suggest reviewing that page.