View source for Talk:Neoconservative

What about William Buckley, et. al? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:32, 23 December 2007 (EST)

: Buckley started out as a [[conservative]] decades ago, but he allowed his publication [[National Review]] to become [[neoconservative]].  Buckley himself has not been a factor in the [[conservative]] movement for at least the last 20 years.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:41, 23 December 2007 (EST)

::Okay, I wanted to add National Review to the list of neoconservative publications, but thought I'd run it by you first. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)

::: That's fine with me!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)

== Hmm… ==

Isn't the standard definition of "neoconservative" something along the lines of "an individual with a political alignment that advocates strong foreign policy and capitalism"? I know because neo-Nazis aren't very fond of them, being xenophobes. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 21:47, 26 December 2007 (EST)

Is this really the definition of neoconservatism? I always thought the neoconservative movement was a reaction to the radical liberalism of the 1960s etc., and emphasized a return to the traditional social values Americans had always held (hence, the "neo"). I'd never heard of liberals masquerading as conservatives counting as neocons.--[[User:Sandalphon|Sandalphon]] 22:43, 27 December 2007 (EST)

== Reversion ==

I reverted some pro-neoconservative propaganda (which had at least one glaring mistake in it).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

== Redirect ==
There are two of the same page here; [[neoconservative]] and [[neoconservatism]].  We should make one a redirect.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 22:30, 13 January 2009 (EST)

: Wow, that's an oversight.  I wonder what the differences are between the articles.  The better one should remain, and incorporate any extra material the other one has, I suppose!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:10, 13 January 2009 (EST)