Difference between revisions of "Fallacy of exclusion"
From Conservapedia
m (fix cat) |
(added "See Also" section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''fallacy of exclusion''' is a [[logic|logical]] fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence'<ref>http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/exclus.htm</ref>. | The '''fallacy of exclusion''' is a [[logic|logical]] fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence'<ref>http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/exclus.htm</ref>. | ||
| − | + | ==See Also== | |
| + | *[[Cherry picking]] | ||
| + | *[[Nutpicking]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 17:54, December 11, 2012
The fallacy of exclusion is a logical fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence'[1].
