Difference between revisions of "User talk:Harmil"
From Conservapedia
Hojimachong (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This ''is'' Conservapedia, and though many of us (myself included) don't take the Bible as pure and wholesome truth, it is treated as the ultimate authority for writing here. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | This ''is'' Conservapedia, and though many of us (myself included) don't take the Bible as pure and wholesome truth, it is treated as the ultimate authority for writing here. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :And yet the note in question a) didn't cite the Bible b) wasn't quoting the Bible and c) didn't make a coherent case. -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] 13:01, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:01, March 12, 2007
This is Conservapedia, and though many of us (myself included) don't take the Bible as pure and wholesome truth, it is treated as the ultimate authority for writing here. --Hojimachongtalk 12:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- And yet the note in question a) didn't cite the Bible b) wasn't quoting the Bible and c) didn't make a coherent case. -Harmil 13:01, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
