Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tesseract"
(→What exactly is this article about?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Sort of, the theory was used in a wrinkle in time though definitivy not elaborated upon. | Sort of, the theory was used in a wrinkle in time though definitivy not elaborated upon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could you rephrase that in a complete sentence without non-words like "definitivy" and then explain why this concept is encyclopedic? [[User:Claude|Claude]] 14:21, 6 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:21, December 6, 2007
Description
I don't want to step on toes, while this page is being created, but it would be better to say that a tesseract can be "depicted in three dimensions as a cube suspended inside another cube, with connections at each if the corresponding vertices." The three dimensional representation is not an actual tesseract, any more than a drawing of a cube on a flat piece of paper is actually a cube. Boomcoach 14:05, 6 December 2007 (EST)
What exactly is this article about?
Is this something from a children's book or something? Claude 14:16, 6 December 2007 (EST)
Sort of, the theory was used in a wrinkle in time though definitivy not elaborated upon.
Could you rephrase that in a complete sentence without non-words like "definitivy" and then explain why this concept is encyclopedic? Claude 14:21, 6 December 2007 (EST)
