Difference between revisions of "User talk:JohnD"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Contentious Edits)
(reply and request)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Contentious Edits==
 
==Contentious Edits==
 
If you are going to make an edit that is contentious, maybe discuss it on the talk-page first. I have spoken to Rick too. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 09:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)
 
If you are going to make an edit that is contentious, maybe discuss it on the talk-page first. I have spoken to Rick too. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 09:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)
 +
:I appreciate your concern. I did try to dicuss it on the talk page, but Rick stopped replying. I would like to propose this compromise. Since you are a sysop and someone I respect, I would like you to make the finally decision regarding the article. I personally do not think it is fair to accusse someone of hate speech without providing any proof, but whatever decision you make I will respect. Thanks for you help.--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 09:56, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 14:56, January 4, 2009

Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, JohnD, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, JohnD!


User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:59, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

Use the article's talk page, not an edit comment, for stuff like this:

It is widely accepted that homosexuals were targeted during the holocuast. The second sentance even admitts there were gay people in the camp, and that they indentified as such.

Okay? --Ed Poor Talk 09:31, 12 November 2008 (EST)

Avoid nonsense about nanotechnology and help me with Homosexuals and the Holocaust. If you know something, contribute. --Ed Poor Talk 09:48, 12 November 2008 (EST)

Nanotechnology

Thanks for your edits as well. I don't work in the field, but have a great interest in it from both a real-world and science-fiction perspective. I like to contribute to the fact-based articles on CP since my viewpoint is not in the mainstream, and this is a topic I'm looking forward to expanding over time. Have a great Thanksgiving! --DinsdaleP 12:41, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Contentious Edits

If you are going to make an edit that is contentious, maybe discuss it on the talk-page first. I have spoken to Rick too. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 09:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)

I appreciate your concern. I did try to dicuss it on the talk page, but Rick stopped replying. I would like to propose this compromise. Since you are a sysop and someone I respect, I would like you to make the finally decision regarding the article. I personally do not think it is fair to accusse someone of hate speech without providing any proof, but whatever decision you make I will respect. Thanks for you help.--JohnD 09:56, 4 January 2009 (EST)