Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientific truth"
From Conservapedia
(Created page with 'I'd suggest that this person's opinion concerning scientific truth can simply be incorporated into another article, e.g. the scientific method, rather than being one in its own r...') |
(merge) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd suggest that this person's opinion concerning scientific truth can simply be incorporated into another article, e.g. the scientific method, rather than being one in its own right. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 18:25, 17 November 2009 (EST) | I'd suggest that this person's opinion concerning scientific truth can simply be incorporated into another article, e.g. the scientific method, rather than being one in its own right. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 18:25, 17 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Agreed. Please merge as suggested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:05, 20 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:05, November 20, 2009
I'd suggest that this person's opinion concerning scientific truth can simply be incorporated into another article, e.g. the scientific method, rather than being one in its own right. DWiggins 18:25, 17 November 2009 (EST)
