Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nobel laureate"
From Conservapedia
(Questioning "liberal bias") |
JoshJGordon (Talk | contribs) (Citation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Liberal bias?== | ==Liberal bias?== | ||
How would you characerize [[Milton Friedman]], [[Friedrich Hayek]], and [[George Stigler]]? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:32, 21 October 2007 (EDT) | How would you characerize [[Milton Friedman]], [[Friedrich Hayek]], and [[George Stigler]]? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:32, 21 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Citation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems to have been almost 3 years since the 'citation needed' tag was added to the statement "there is strong evidence that recipients are chosen in a biased manner". | ||
| + | |||
| + | Has such a citation ever been found? If not should the statement not be removed. I believe 3 years is easily enough time to be able to find supporting evidence to a claim. [[User:JoshJGordon|JoshJGordon]] 09:03, 20 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:03, August 20, 2010
Liberal bias?
How would you characerize Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, and George Stigler? Dpbsmith 13:32, 21 October 2007 (EDT)
Citation
It seems to have been almost 3 years since the 'citation needed' tag was added to the statement "there is strong evidence that recipients are chosen in a biased manner".
Has such a citation ever been found? If not should the statement not be removed. I believe 3 years is easily enough time to be able to find supporting evidence to a claim. JoshJGordon 09:03, 20 August 2010 (EDT)
