Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jpatt"
From Conservapedia
(→Thank you) |
(username removed) (→Thank you) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST) | I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST) | ||
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST) | :You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:28, January 16, 2012
Contents
Archive 2008
Archive 2009
Archive 2010
Archive 2011
Blank3r
Good job stopping him.JonM 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Adambro
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by "AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X". Is he a sockpuppet ? --PhilipN 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)
- AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--Jpatt 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)
- I will, thanks for the info. --PhilipN 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Thank you
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? Lansing 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --Jpatt 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- What a shame, indeed. Lansing 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. DynaboyJ 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)