Difference between revisions of "User talk:Brenden"
(→Re: Libertarians) |
(→Well Done: new section) |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
If by "social issues", you mean things like gay marriage, not things like social security, then yes. However, there's differing opinions on abortion. All libertarians are opposed to government funding for abortion (with most considering it a separate issue than government funding in general), but we differ on whether it should be legal at all, or under what circumstances. Also, there are different kinds of libertarians, some of which are more socially liberal/fiscally conservative than others. Libertarian socialists, for instance, would not be fiscally conservative. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:50, 28 June 2012 (EDT) | If by "social issues", you mean things like gay marriage, not things like social security, then yes. However, there's differing opinions on abortion. All libertarians are opposed to government funding for abortion (with most considering it a separate issue than government funding in general), but we differ on whether it should be legal at all, or under what circumstances. Also, there are different kinds of libertarians, some of which are more socially liberal/fiscally conservative than others. Libertarian socialists, for instance, would not be fiscally conservative. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:50, 28 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
: I should add that most of the time, when we say "libertarian", we're talking about right-wing libertarians, who are in fact fiscally conservative. Libertarian (should have small l but it starts a sentence) socialists are essentially "voluntary socialists", so to speak. They believe socialism should happen not because the government says so but because the people say so and do it voluntarily. Big-L Libertarianism refers specifically to the Libertarian Party, who is fiscally conservative and socially liberal. However, in 2008 they nominated Bob Barr for President, and he was pretty socially conservative - he supported DOMA and the War on Drugs. But a lot of us weren't happy about that. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:56, 28 June 2012 (EDT) | : I should add that most of the time, when we say "libertarian", we're talking about right-wing libertarians, who are in fact fiscally conservative. Libertarian (should have small l but it starts a sentence) socialists are essentially "voluntary socialists", so to speak. They believe socialism should happen not because the government says so but because the people say so and do it voluntarily. Big-L Libertarianism refers specifically to the Libertarian Party, who is fiscally conservative and socially liberal. However, in 2008 they nominated Bob Barr for President, and he was pretty socially conservative - he supported DOMA and the War on Drugs. But a lot of us weren't happy about that. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 12:56, 28 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Well Done == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello Brenden, good job with the creation of [[Template:Warning/misc|this template]]. It gives the user the opportunity to realize that he/she is not editing appropriately and correct his/her edits. This is much better than an immediate block, in my opinion. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 23:40, 28 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:40, June 29, 2012
Welcome!
Hello, Brenden, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Brenden!
The socks which were blocked, including yours, had a single IP, but I will accept your explanation. Please continue to edit in the site. Karajou 19:13, 17 April 2012 (EDT)
Greetings from a fellow gay (and very much out and proud!) editor at conservapedia! --JHunter 21:13, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
- I'm sorry, wut?
| Brenden. |
|---|
Contents
A special thank you
Thank you for helping to tag the contributions by User:Slaine for speedy deletion. I have blocked the user infinitely. GregG 17:28, 29 April 2012 (EDT)
Quick Thanks
Thank you for cleaning up my addition to Homosexual Agenda. Still learning to get the right 'tone' for articles, much appreciated. JRegden 02:57, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
thanks
Thank you for adding a category to Chomsky hierarchy. Perhaps you could have a look at the articles I'm interested in on my talk page and see if any of these need categorising. RolandPlankton 18:46, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
Marriage Privatization
I saw your comment on marriage privatization, but I think you pretty much answered your own question. Take a look at what I wrote. Gregkochuconn 18:19, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
Thanks
Dear Brenden, thanks for joining Conservapedia! Its great to see individuals with diverse views join the encyclopedia in order to help create and improve articles all around. With regards, AnupamTalk 19:37, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
Thin Ice
Keep your grimy hands off my pages before I get one of the admins to kick you to the curb. --FPhelps 00:02, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
- right...brenden 00:05, 15 May 2012 (EDT)
Your Welcome Message
Thanks for the welcome message! Glad to be here! PCorbett 00:56, 24 May 2012 (EDT)
You've got guts Brenden!
That's why I recommended you for promotion. Check user rights log! EJamesW 15:08, 9 June 2012 (EDT)
Stick to the point
Brenden, please don't make off-topic remarks like this. --Ed Poor Talk 14:47, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
- Eh, I'd rather see it as the Saloon bar style pages of social networking sites.brenden 19:11, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
ED POOR!!!
Sorry about the all caps, needed to get your attention. By what do you mean, that "refusing sysop direction about talk page use" is a a valid reason for a block? As I said before, sysops are janitors, not the thought police, and dissension was never a blockable reason, at least not in any of the CP commandments. brenden 12:19, 21 June 2012 (EDT)
Re: Libertarians
If by "social issues", you mean things like gay marriage, not things like social security, then yes. However, there's differing opinions on abortion. All libertarians are opposed to government funding for abortion (with most considering it a separate issue than government funding in general), but we differ on whether it should be legal at all, or under what circumstances. Also, there are different kinds of libertarians, some of which are more socially liberal/fiscally conservative than others. Libertarian socialists, for instance, would not be fiscally conservative. Gregkochuconn 12:50, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
- I should add that most of the time, when we say "libertarian", we're talking about right-wing libertarians, who are in fact fiscally conservative. Libertarian (should have small l but it starts a sentence) socialists are essentially "voluntary socialists", so to speak. They believe socialism should happen not because the government says so but because the people say so and do it voluntarily. Big-L Libertarianism refers specifically to the Libertarian Party, who is fiscally conservative and socially liberal. However, in 2008 they nominated Bob Barr for President, and he was pretty socially conservative - he supported DOMA and the War on Drugs. But a lot of us weren't happy about that. Gregkochuconn 12:56, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
Well Done
Hello Brenden, good job with the creation of this template. It gives the user the opportunity to realize that he/she is not editing appropriately and correct his/her edits. This is much better than an immediate block, in my opinion. With regards, AnupamTalk 23:40, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
