Sprint/United Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NathanG (Talk | contribs) at 21:49, May 4, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning employment discrimination:[1]

  • Should an age discrimination plaintiff have been allowed to introduce the testimony of co-workers who also claimed the employer used age as a factor in implementing a reduction in force?

References

  1. Sprint/United Management Co v. Mendelsohn, No. 06-1221. Certiorari granted June 11, 2007. Ruling below: 466 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2006).