Difference between revisions of "Correlation"
(no one ever finished writing the "in other words...") |
(Made the entry actually deal with correlation, instead of the utter disaster that it was before. Seriously, people, this is MATH for crying out loud!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''' | + | The '''correlation coefficient''', also known as '''Pearson's r''', is a statistical measure of association between two ratio variables. It is defined as: |
| − | + | '''r'''= ΣZ<sub>x</sub>Z<sub>y</sub>/n | |
| − | + | Where: '''Z<sub>x</sub>'''= the Z-score of the independent variable X, '''Z<sub>y</sub>'''= the Z-score of the dependent variable Y, and '''n'''= the number of observations of variables X and Y. | |
| − | ==Correlation and causation== | + | Thus, Pearson's r is the arithmetic mean of the products of the variable Z-scores. The Z-scores used in the correlation coefficient must be calculated using the population formula for the standard deviation and thus: |
| + | |||
| + | '''Z<sub>x</sub>'''= (X-M<sub>x</sub>)/SD<sub>x</sub> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where: '''M<sub>x</sub>'''= the arithmetic mean of the variable x and '''SD<sub>x</sub>'''= the standard deviation of the variable x. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''SD<sub>x</sub>'''= Σ(X-M<sub>x</sub>)<sup>2</sup>/n | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where: '''n'''= the number of observations of variables x and y | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Z<sub>y</sub>'''= (Y-M<sub>y</sub>)/SD<sub>y</sub> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where: '''M<sub>y</sub>'''= the arithmetic mean of the variable Y and '''SD<sub>y</sub>'''= the standard deviation of the variable Y. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''SD<sub>y</sub>'''= Σ(Y-M<sub>y</sub>)<sup>2</sup>/n | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where: '''n'''= the number of observations of variables X and Y | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pearson's r varies between -1 and +1. A value of zero indicates that no association is present between the variables, a value of positive one indicates that the strongest possible positive association exists and a value of negative one indicates that the strongest possible negative association exists. In a positive relationship as variable X increases in value, variable Y will also increase in value (e.g. as number of hours worked (X) increases, weekly pay (Y) also increases). In contrast, in a negative relationship as variable X increases in value, variable Y will decrease in value (e.g. as number of alcoholic beverages consumed (X) increases, score on a test of hand-eye coordination (Y) decreases). | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is important to note that while a correlation coefficient may be calculated for any set of numbers there are no guarantees that this coefficient is statistically significant. That is to say, without statistical significance we cannot be certain that the computed correlation is an accurate reflection of reality. Significance may be assessed using a variant on the standard [[Student's t-test]] defined as: | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''t'''= (r)√(n-2)/√(1-r<sup>2</sup>) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The results of this test should be evaluated against the standard t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to n-2. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is important to note that the correlation coefficient should not be calculated when either of the variables are non-ratio. That is, when they do not vary continuously and have a meaningful zero. As such, correlating a dichotomous variable (e.g. sex) with a ratio variable (e.g. IQ) is inappropriate and will return uninterpretable results. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, correlation estimates a linear relationship between X and Y. Thus, an increase in variable X is assumed to exert the same influence on Y across all values of X and Y. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Correlation and Causation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Correlation is a linear statistic and makes no mathematical distinction between independent and dependent variables. As a consequence, it is impossible to assert [[causation]] based on a correlation even if that correlation is statistically significant. Therefore, when a significant correlation has been identified it is possible that X -> Y (i.e. X causes Y), Y -> X (i.e. Y causes X), or that X <- Z -> Y (i.e. Both X and Y are caused by an additional variable, Z). Caution must be exercised in asserting causation using correlation and claims to this effect (e.g. atheism causes suicide) must be viewed with considerable skepticism. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Correlation and Language== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The term "correlation" or "correlated" has entered common usage as meaning "is associated with." It is important to note, however, that correlation is actually a technical term denoting a very specific class of relationship. Many common usages of the term are, therefore, substantively incorrect. | ||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | Aron, Arthur, Elaine N. Aron and Elliot J. Coups. 2008. ''Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course.'' 4/e. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. | |
[[Category:statistics]] | [[Category:statistics]] | ||
Revision as of 21:18, June 15, 2008
The correlation coefficient, also known as Pearson's r, is a statistical measure of association between two ratio variables. It is defined as:
r= ΣZxZy/n
Where: Zx= the Z-score of the independent variable X, Zy= the Z-score of the dependent variable Y, and n= the number of observations of variables X and Y.
Thus, Pearson's r is the arithmetic mean of the products of the variable Z-scores. The Z-scores used in the correlation coefficient must be calculated using the population formula for the standard deviation and thus:
Zx= (X-Mx)/SDx
Where: Mx= the arithmetic mean of the variable x and SDx= the standard deviation of the variable x.
SDx= Σ(X-Mx)2/n
Where: n= the number of observations of variables x and y
Zy= (Y-My)/SDy
Where: My= the arithmetic mean of the variable Y and SDy= the standard deviation of the variable Y.
SDy= Σ(Y-My)2/n
Where: n= the number of observations of variables X and Y
Pearson's r varies between -1 and +1. A value of zero indicates that no association is present between the variables, a value of positive one indicates that the strongest possible positive association exists and a value of negative one indicates that the strongest possible negative association exists. In a positive relationship as variable X increases in value, variable Y will also increase in value (e.g. as number of hours worked (X) increases, weekly pay (Y) also increases). In contrast, in a negative relationship as variable X increases in value, variable Y will decrease in value (e.g. as number of alcoholic beverages consumed (X) increases, score on a test of hand-eye coordination (Y) decreases).
It is important to note that while a correlation coefficient may be calculated for any set of numbers there are no guarantees that this coefficient is statistically significant. That is to say, without statistical significance we cannot be certain that the computed correlation is an accurate reflection of reality. Significance may be assessed using a variant on the standard Student's t-test defined as:
t= (r)√(n-2)/√(1-r2)
The results of this test should be evaluated against the standard t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to n-2.
It is important to note that the correlation coefficient should not be calculated when either of the variables are non-ratio. That is, when they do not vary continuously and have a meaningful zero. As such, correlating a dichotomous variable (e.g. sex) with a ratio variable (e.g. IQ) is inappropriate and will return uninterpretable results.
Additionally, correlation estimates a linear relationship between X and Y. Thus, an increase in variable X is assumed to exert the same influence on Y across all values of X and Y.
Correlation and Causation
Correlation is a linear statistic and makes no mathematical distinction between independent and dependent variables. As a consequence, it is impossible to assert causation based on a correlation even if that correlation is statistically significant. Therefore, when a significant correlation has been identified it is possible that X -> Y (i.e. X causes Y), Y -> X (i.e. Y causes X), or that X <- Z -> Y (i.e. Both X and Y are caused by an additional variable, Z). Caution must be exercised in asserting causation using correlation and claims to this effect (e.g. atheism causes suicide) must be viewed with considerable skepticism.
Correlation and Language
The term "correlation" or "correlated" has entered common usage as meaning "is associated with." It is important to note, however, that correlation is actually a technical term denoting a very specific class of relationship. Many common usages of the term are, therefore, substantively incorrect.
References
Aron, Arthur, Elaine N. Aron and Elliot J. Coups. 2008. Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course. 4/e. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
