Changes

Debate:Atheism vs. Pastafarianism

1,628 bytes added, 13:56, April 29, 2007
I suppose cut and paste is the sincerest form of flattery. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:54, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Here's what I actually wrote:
 
==Why Atheism is ridiculous==
Stick with me, this can get confusing for those who aren't highly verbal and good with spatial concepts. "God" is another word for "everything." God equals everything. Everthing is God. To deny that "God" exists is silly because the universe and everything in it exists. Thus, atheism is prepostorous if God is everything.
 
The only question (and it is a valid question) is whether Everything when taken as a whole is sentient or not.
 
In other words, does God (or "everything" if you prefer) think? Does God have a plan? Or is Everything (''i.e.'' God) just ... here?
 
Some people prefer to believe that Everything is just randomness with no plan. "Everything" is just does its thing with no guiding force, no rules, no anything. Everything, of course in an ever changing but non-planned form, has always been here. Everything will always been here. Everything is nicely organized into protons and electrons and stars and galaxies. Lives come and go with no meaning whatsoever. All of this and more is "Everything".
 
Some people have come to realize that Everything seems to have a design and a plan, and that the Grand Architect planned everything. Some people (Einstien included) believe that time is an illusion and that the infinitely complex organizational structure of Everything implies one undeniable conclusion: Everything (or God) is sentient. God has a plan. That plan is far more complicated than we can possibly imagine or understand. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 11:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT) [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 09:56, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
 
767
edits