Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jack Chick"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Cool?)
(Cool?)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
I saw a cool comment was made in regards to this guys work and I admit to being baffled.  I think the guy is a crackpot but hey, this is America and he is entitled to his opinion, as long as he isn't inciting violence or a restriction of lifestyle against others.  Wait, he probably is doing that.   
 
I saw a cool comment was made in regards to this guys work and I admit to being baffled.  I think the guy is a crackpot but hey, this is America and he is entitled to his opinion, as long as he isn't inciting violence or a restriction of lifestyle against others.  Wait, he probably is doing that.   
 
--[[User:AGivenVoice|AGivenVoice]] 19:14, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 
--[[User:AGivenVoice|AGivenVoice]] 19:14, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yeah, all fundamentalists are going to be viewed as such by intolerant liberals. I think this guy is right-on. If you don't accept Jesus alone as salvation, you're not going to be saved! It's pretty simple, it is. '''<font color="#FFCC00">Scorp</font><font color="#773300">ion</font>'''<sup>[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]]</sup> 11:28, 4 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 12:28, 4 December 2007

Love him, hate him...those tracts were ALWAYS the bestest. --Crackertalk 23:01, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

I read my first one at a campground near Bar Harbor when I was a kid. I thought it was simultaneously cool and ridiculous. It was the Rapture one, where they declare One Church, the Pope is a tool of the Devil, and the little kid rats out his grandfather for being a Christian. Love love LOVE those things.--Dave3172 23:08, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
I first came across them in high school when I was volunteering at a soup kitchen in Denver that was handing them out. They had the "this was your life" one, which isn't especially controversial. I didn't realize until later just how controversial some of his tracts are. MountainDew 23:09, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
I was linked to one during a session of debate on IRC - we were making fun of the way he invaraiably shows pro-evolution teachers as wrinkly, old, crabby, irritable and aggressive. His tracts are highly entertaining, but I wouldn't think such shallow arguments make effective evangelism. He basicly just repeats 'Join us or go to hell' in different variations. - Suricou

Cool?

I saw a cool comment was made in regards to this guys work and I admit to being baffled. I think the guy is a crackpot but hey, this is America and he is entitled to his opinion, as long as he isn't inciting violence or a restriction of lifestyle against others. Wait, he probably is doing that. --AGivenVoice 19:14, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, all fundamentalists are going to be viewed as such by intolerant liberals. I think this guy is right-on. If you don't accept Jesus alone as salvation, you're not going to be saved! It's pretty simple, it is. ScorpionVote for Pedro 11:28, 4 December 2007 (EST)