Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rachel Carson"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(too upsetting for words)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I would like to write more about her - and other environmentalist nitwits, but they disgust me so much it's actually physically painful to write. They've killed more people with the [[DDT ban]] alone than Hitler's [[Holocaust]]. No wonder Ann Coulter calls them [[druids]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:38, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I would like to write more about her - and other environmentalist nitwits, but they disgust me so much it's actually physically painful to write. They've killed more people with the [[DDT ban]] alone than Hitler's [[Holocaust]]. No wonder Ann Coulter calls them [[druids]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:38, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Baloney. That's an offensive and an outrageous claim.
 +
 +
::I find it fascinating that you find it "physically painful" to write about Rachel Carson but are eager to lap up the work of Ann "Let's-tell-another-joke-about-a-liberal's-dead-relative" Coulter.--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:59, 30 June 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 16:59, June 30, 2007

I would like to write more about her - and other environmentalist nitwits, but they disgust me so much it's actually physically painful to write. They've killed more people with the DDT ban alone than Hitler's Holocaust. No wonder Ann Coulter calls them druids. --Ed Poor 17:38, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Baloney. That's an offensive and an outrageous claim.
I find it fascinating that you find it "physically painful" to write about Rachel Carson but are eager to lap up the work of Ann "Let's-tell-another-joke-about-a-liberal's-dead-relative" Coulter.--PF Fox 12:59, 30 June 2007 (EDT)