Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Hunger Games"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fascist or Liberal?)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
An excellent compromise, I think. I'm reluctant to call it liberal because I'm British and "liberal" instinctively means something different to me, but "big government" is a perfect description. Thanks for this. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 22:23, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
An excellent compromise, I think. I'm reluctant to call it liberal because I'm British and "liberal" instinctively means something different to me, but "big government" is a perfect description. Thanks for this. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 22:23, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 +
:Actually, neither works. This book is a piece of young adult literature, not a soapbox to lament big government/liberalism.23:02, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
==Plot==
 
==Plot==
 
Has anyone even read this book? It's not bad, I have read it. [[User:JonM|JonM]] 22:35, 26 March 2012 (EDT)
 
Has anyone even read this book? It's not bad, I have read it. [[User:JonM|JonM]] 22:35, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:02, March 27, 2012

Fascist or Liberal?

An excellent compromise, I think. I'm reluctant to call it liberal because I'm British and "liberal" instinctively means something different to me, but "big government" is a perfect description. Thanks for this. --SamCoulter 22:23, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Actually, neither works. This book is a piece of young adult literature, not a soapbox to lament big government/liberalism.23:02, 26 March 2012 (EDT)

Plot

Has anyone even read this book? It's not bad, I have read it. JonM 22:35, 26 March 2012 (EDT)