Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]] | [[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]] | ||
| + | ==War news== | ||
| + | *'''''[https://thepeacemonger.substack.com/p/provoked-how-decades-of-american Provoked: How Decades of American Policy Set the Stage for Catastrophe in Ukraine].''''' | ||
| + | :*[https://korybko.substack.com/p/russias-security-guarantee-requests Russia’s Security Guarantee Requests Would Have Restored Ukraine’s Full Independence]. | ||
| + | ::Comment: It's too late now to go back to 2014, or even 2022 with so many dead. | ||
| + | [[File:Wager.PNG|center|750px|thumb|]] | ||
| + | *''[[The American Conservative]]'': [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/trumps-broken-deals-make-foreign-policy-difficult/ Trump’s Broken Deals Make Foreign Policy Difficult]. ''America’s friends and adversaries alike believe the U.S. president can’t be trusted.'' | ||
| + | :Comment: As one commentator suggested, [[American foreign policy]] is not like [[New York]] [[real estate]], where you don't pay contractors, forcing them to sue and settle for less. | ||
| + | *[https://youtu.be/DjwDsQzZqOU No matter who you vote for, you always get John McCain]. | ||
| + | *[[Conflicts Forum]]: [https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/exaggerated-us-capabilities-unmasked Exaggerated US capabilities unmasked as US’ image collapses]. | ||
| + | *[[Richard Sakwa]]: [[NATO]] Is [[Escalating]] the [[Ukraine War]] - [[Moscow]] Rebuilds [[Deterrence theory|Deterrence]]. [https://youtu.be/7whRxywj3Ec] | ||
| + | *[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/trump-world-all-war-all-the-time Trump World: All War All The Time]. | ||
| + | :*[https://russiatruthdotcom.substack.com/p/trumps-schoolyard-geopolitics-and Trump’s Schoolyard Geopolitics and the "They Just Hate Each Other" Farce]. | ||
| + | *[[Steve Jermy]]: [https://youtu.be/BgVsAyukjMU End of U.S. Military Primacy - New Strategic Thinking Requried] | ||
| + | *[[Larry Johnson]]: Every turn of the [[economic sanctions|sanctions]] screw against [[Iranian]] and [[Russian]] [[oil]] tightens the global supply of it, and the [[price]] is paid at every pump in [[the West]]. ...The campaign to deny [[Tehran]] its [[revenue]] is simultaneously a campaign to raise the cost of [[energy]] for the sanctioning [[coalition]]’s own [[voter]]s." | ||
| + | *[[News Forensics]]: [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/both-sides-now-proxy-wars Both sides now: proxy wars]. | ||
| + | {{quotebox-float|[[Ukraine]] is a [[US]] and [[NATO]] [[proxy]] setup to conduct unprovoked full-scale [[war]] against [[Russia]], initially by attacking [[Russian]] [[people]] in [[Donbass]] and [[Lugansk]] and [[Odessa]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 2022 [[NATO]] had equipped [[Ukrainian]] armies creating the largest [[military]] force in [[Europe]] at the time for a “final solution” to kill or drive out Russian speaking Ukrainians in southern and [[eastern Ukraine]], an effort which had begun in 2014 when the [[neo-Nazi]]s overthrew the [[legal]]ly and [[democratic]]ally [[election|elect]]ed [[government]] of [[Ukraine]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Russian]]s call this [[war]] a "[[Special Military Operation]]" because it is not a [[war]] against [[Ukraine]] but rather a defensive operation against the [[Russophobic]] [[nation]]s of [[Europe]] and the [[Anglo]]sphere. Now of course the [[American]]s are pretending that the [[war]] is [[Ukraine]]’s, despite providing [[intelligence]] and targeting information to [[Ukraine]] as well as [[weapon]]s to [[US]] [[allies]] in [[Europe]] who provide those same [[weapon]]s to [[Kyiv]], although they get blown up on arrival for the most part. | ||
| − | + | The [[hypocrisy]] is obvious. But this is the [[American]] way of [[war]] since [[Vietnam]]...}} | |
| − | *[https:// | + | *[[Yanis Varoufakis]]: [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/yanis-varoufakis-eu-is-finished-and EU Is Finished & China Can Now Pull the Plug on the U.S. Economy]. |
| − | :*[[ | + | |
| − | :: | + | *[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/trump-the-screwup The Pentagon is the largest consumer of oil distillates on Earth and is facing the reality of having blown up, directly or unintentionally, too many refineries to be capable of further and wider war.] |
| − | + | :"Please read that last paragraph again. The idea that the US can launch a new major campaign against Iran without diesel or jet fuel—or with limited supplies—is absurd. Remember, if Trump runs supplies down to zero, Russia still has what it needs. | |
| − | *[[ | + | |
| − | *[https:// | + | *[https://youtu.be/YYYRKxtsPaQ Dissecting the deep state cadaver]. |
| − | *[[ | + | |
| − | *[[ | + | *[[User:Conservative]] Update: [https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/10/democratic-establishment-angie-nixon-abdul-el-sayed-rahm-emanuel.html Democratic Establishment Stuck in Groundhog Day of Neoliberal Economics and Neocon Foreign Policy]. |
| − | * | + | |
| − | {{quotebox-float| | + | *''[[Responsible Statecraft]]'': [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/burrito-war-affordability/ Let them eat burritos: Out of touch influencers risk all for Trump war]. ''Republicans on pro-war autopilot are mocking Americans who are concerned about rising prices. Not a good look ahead of the midterms.'' |
| + | |||
| + | *[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/ToksxXw0e_Q US quest for global domination comes apart as Europe burns]. | ||
| + | :*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/the-war-of-grand-design-transforms The 'War of Grand Design' Transforms to More Narrowly Bolster US Hegemony]. | ||
| + | {{quotebox-float|The networked supra-national stratum that long has pursued its global ‘'[[History_of_NATO#Origins_and_mission_creep|Grand Design]]’ through manufacturing public consent for wars of imposed compliance has, at last, run up against the limits to power. We are, indeed, at an ‘emperor has no clothes’ moment. All can see it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Its traditional tools — the [[US]] [[military]], the [[dollar]] system, the credit trap, the [[Bretton Woods]] structures, shock [[economic]] therapy and [[currency]] [[war]]s — are failing to preserve the [[US]] [[elitism|élite]] ''weltanschauung'' wherein it would be ‘unimaginable’ that the US having won the [[Cold War]] were it to face a world in which the US did not continue to dictate the blueprint | ||
| + | |||
| + | “In the golden light of an [[Athens]] evening, with the [[Acropolis]] over his shoulder”, [[US Secretary of State Marco Rubio]], on 7 October, openly praised [[colonialism]]; he engaged in egregious erasures of [[history]], and demanded a return to [[Western]] domination of the world. Rubio asserted that [[the West]] must use [[military]] force to “maintain its place at the head of the world”; [[the West]] is “the greatest [[civilization]] in the world”, he declared, emphasizing that it is a “civilization that we must fight to defend today with the same passion as our forefathers did”. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But now, those traditional tools to preserve its place at the head of the world are proving less effective against states that possess alternatives — [[China]], [[Russia]] and [[Iran]] are clear pointers to the trend that [[economic]], [[financial]] and even [[kinetic]] [[war]]s are failing to produce quick results. Quick victories for the Matrix are no longer so readily available. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To suggest, on the other hand, that [[civilisational state]]s could stand up to the [[US]] more forcefully ignores everything about the deep nature of this conflict. The ‘[[One Global Government]] Grand Design’, is a war to eliminate those [[Civilisational States]] that offer a different consciousness through which to view and understand the world.}} | ||
| + | *[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/what-trade-off-could-trumps-grand What Trade-Off Could Trump’s Grand Deal Between Putin & Zelensky Realistically Entail?] | ||
| + | *[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/10/coffee-break-armed-madhouse-weapons-fetishism-when-the-tools-of-war-no-longer-serve-strategic-ends.html Armed Madhouse – Weapons Fetishism: When the Tools of War no Longer Serve Strategic Ends]. | ||
| + | *[[Patrick Lawrence]]: [https://consortiumnews.com/ Trump & the Rrrrussians]. | ||
| + | {{quotebox-float|Given the gush of vitriol and condemnation since Oct. 9, when [[Donald Trump]] announced his deal to import 5 million metric tons of [[Russian]] [[diesel]], roughly 37 million barrels, one would think the president had surrendered the [[United States]]’ [[sovereignty]] to the [[Kremlin]], or handed over the [[Ukrainian]]s to the [[Russian army]], or rankly betrayed the [[European]]s or altogether renounced what we picturesquely call [[Western civilization]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is, indeed, what we read daily in the [[MSM|corporate press]] these days and what we are supposed to think. It is 2016 redux, it seems. Another round of [[Russiagate]] may not be far off, given 16 House Democrats have introduced a Prohibit Corrupt Russia Oil Deals Act and 12 senators now attack the diesel accord as “a gift to our adversary.” | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there is one thing essential to recall about those dreary years it is that the wobbly-from-the-first [[Russiagate]] edifice, the whole of it, was made of mis– and [[disinformation]], hyperbole, innuendo, extravagant abuses of office and [[propaganda]] incessantly disseminated in [[MSM|corporate media]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It was, in short, the [[Deep State]]’s attempt to scuttle any effort to advance beyond the poisonous [[Russophobia]] it had spent a decade cultivating (taking my date from [[Vladimir Putin]]’s era-defining speech to the [[Munich Security Conference]] in 2007). | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is the same again as Trump tries once more to end the [[war in Ukraine]] and refashion East–West relations, a project the old “[[MIC]]IMATT”— the [[MIC|military-industrial]], [[congressional]], [[intelligence]], [[media]], [[academic]] and [[think tank]] [[The Blob|blob]] — simply cannot abide.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[User:Conservative]]'s hero [[John Mearsheimer]]: [https://youtu.be/dFcCJtCE4Ig Are Aircraft Carriers Obsolete?] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Will Schryver]]: [https://imetatronink.substack.com/p/war-is-a-moral-argument War Is A Moral Argument]. | ||
| + | :[[User:Conservative]]'s argument that a lack of [[flush toilet]]s in the frozen north justifies [[war]] under [[Thomas Aquinas]]' [[Just War Theory]] fails the [[moral]]ity test. It also fails the [[common sense]] and [[sanity]] test. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{quotebox-float|Take out a pencil, draw a line down the center of the page and on the left hand-column write out every individual, nation, organization, institution and political movement that is aligned with, and advanced the [[global warming]]/[[climate change]] agenda. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then, on the right-hand column, write out every individual, nation, organization, institution and political movement that is aligned with, advances the interests of, and [[Ukraine aid|support for Ukraine]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Notice something in the commonality? | ||
| + | |||
| + | They are a perfect match. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 25+ years of [[Global Warming]], [[Climate Change]], [[Net Zero]], Carbon Trading, Carbon Taxing, [[Build Back Better]] etc. advocacy, revolves around the singularity of one issue, [[energy]] production. | ||
| + | |||
| + | From that baseline the [[western]] nemesis of a multi-trillion [[investment]] and [[banking]] system, built around the destruction of the [[coal]], [[oil]] and [[gas]] [[carbon]]-based [[energy]] sector is [[Russia]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, over the past 10 years as [[western]] interests have stopped building [[oil]] refining capacity, [[Russia]] has expanded oil refining capacity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | All ‘modern’ opposition to Russia in the last 25 years, is now culminating…. But the root is something everyone misses. The root commonality of interests is Energy Production. | ||
| − | + | The advocates for the system of dependencies created by the “[[climate change]]/net zero” energy processes are the same advocates supporting Ukraine and specifically supporting the targeting of [[Russian]] [[energy]] production vis-a-vis Russian oil refineries.}} | |
| − | [...] | + | *[https://www.military.com/pentagon-nuclear-review-could-expand-war-options-outside-public-view Pentagon Nuclear Review Could Expand War Options Outside Public View]. ''The [[Pentagon]] is reviewing limited [[nuclear war]] options, raising questions about [[escalation]] risks and public disclosure of its findings.'' |
| − | + | *[[Pentagon]] operates without its chief [[military]] planner: [[Hegseth]]’s dismisses and makes [[criminal]] referral of Joint Staff J5 Lieutenant General Brett Sylvia. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | *[[ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *[[CNN]]: [https://youtu.be/0cPRdwHWf64 Republicans turn against Hegseth after election losses]. | |
| − | + | ::This ain't gonna work. More heads have to role, beginning with [[Susie Wiles]]. Trump's best bet at this point is to whack [[Zelensky]] and resign, turn things over to [[JD Vance]]. [[User:RobSmith|Foghorn Leghorn]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 21:05, November 4, 2026 (EST) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | === | + | ===Strategic Summary Late October - Early November 2026=== |
| − | + | The [[Persian Gulf]] is Closed on [[Tehran]]’s Terms: With three more tankers burning and US unmanned reconnaissance systematically downed, [[Western]] [[naval]] presence has failed to reopen the [[Strait of Hormuz]] to hostile commerce. | |
| − | + | [[Economic sanctions]] have failed: The 10-fold increase in [[China]]-[[Iran]] rail freight traffic proves that continental integration across the [[Eurasian]] landmass provides a resilient alternative to [[Western]]-controlled sea lanes. | |
| − | + | The multi-front [[reality]] is locked: From the [[Black Sea]] to the [[Gulf of Oman]], [[asymmetric warfare|asymmetric maritime]] and aerial strike systems have rewritten the rules of [[naval]] engagement, leaving [[capital]] fleets vulnerable to low-cost attrition. | |
| − | [ | ||
| − | [[ | ||
| − | + | The [[delusion]] that the [[United States]] can launch a localized, painless strike against [[Iran]] to reassert authority is collapsing before the operation even begins. | |
| − | [ | ||
| − | + | If [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] launches its planned post-[[Midterm election|midterm]] assault, it will not trigger [[Iranian]] submission. It will detonate a multi-trillion-dollar regional conflagration that shuts down the global [[energy]] [[supply]], breaks the remaining [[naval]] architecture of the [[Middle East]], and delivers a fatal blow to the [[economic]] foundation of the late [[Western]] [[empire]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *[https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/tucker-carlson-claims-trump-planning Tucker Carlson Claims Trump Planning to Nuke Iran. But Could the US Really Pull It Off?] ''We examine the likelihood of such a mission being successful, and how it would potentially be carried out.'' | |
| − | * | + | The nuclear option breaks down into two separately related but slightly different bombs: the B61-11 and B61-12. Their differences are crucial in understanding the potential options against Iran. |
| − | + | :*[https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/when-stealth-meets-the-bomb-inside When Stealth Meets the Bomb: Inside the US-Israel Nuclear Strike Scenario on Iran’s Deep Bunkers]. | |
| − | : | ||
| − | :* | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | : | + | *[https://global21.substack.com/p/the-use-of-a-nuclear-weapon-in-iran The use of a nuclear weapon in Iran may not destroy the mountain, but it destroys an entire model of international relations.] |
| + | The use of tactical missiles and direct attacks against a regional power like [[Iran]] would redefine traditional concepts of [[state]] [[sovereignty]], respect for [[border]]s, and, above all, the [[logic]] of global [[nuclear deterrence]]. | ||
| + | In [[international law]] and [[International relations|relations between states]], territorial [[sovereignty]] is the fundamental pillar. A direct attack with tactical missiles would transform that dynamic and bring an end to traditional red lines. It would demonstrate that possessing a robust conventional army or a vast territory no longer prevents invasion or direct bombardment by [[technological]]ly superior forces. | ||
| − | + | This would consolidate the idea that states can violate the [[sovereignty]] of others on the basis of anticipated threats, a precedent we already live with, but one that would reach another level with [[nuclear weapon]]s. | |
| − | The | + | The most dangerous shift would occur in how countries view [[nuclear weapon]]s. [[Historical]]ly, [[deterrence]] works on the premise that the cost of attacking a country is too high. If Iran, a country on the threshold of nuclear development, is attacked in a conventional and tactical manner, the [[geopolitical]] message would first and foremost be one of encouragement to [[proliferate]]. |
| − | + | '''[[Joe Kent]]:''' [[America]] is no longer providing [[security guarantee]]s, that we're no longer capable of projecting power in the way that we once were. I think, you know, as dumb as the [[Iraq war]] was, [[Saddam Hussein]] had one of the bigger militaries at the time, especially in '91 when we went into [[Kuwait]] and expelled Saddam from there, we kept [[economic sanctions|sanctions]] on, we choked off [[Iraq]], and then in ' 03, we ran through the [[Iraq]]i [[army]] like a hot knife through butter and we just showed how muscular and powerful we were. We got humiliated because we didn't understand, you know, the [[insurgency]] factor. We didn't learn any of our lessons from [[Vietnam war|Vietnam]]. But we still had a lot of [[military]] might. We could still project power. We could still dominate the [[Persian Gulf]] with our [[aircraft carrier]]s. We dominated the skies. Like we never even thought other than like, some rockets and mortars here and there. We never thought about having to be threatened from the skies. | |
| − | + | "But the world has changed and we're no longer going to be the guarantors of [[security]] for the entire [[Persian Gulf|Gulf]]. | |
| − | + | "I do think too, that we've shown a lot of our weakness, and that is going to affect the [[Petrodollar]], and that's pretty dangerous. So I think we should be trying to mitigate that as much as we possibly can. We've already basically shown the [[GCC|Gulf countries]] that we can't keep our word. Our part of the bargain was, 'you guys use the [[Petrodollar]], you cut us in on all the transactions by using the [[dollar]] that you're making with the [[oil]], and we'll provide you [[security guarantee]]s. Well, our security guarantees bought them a bunch of [[ballistic missile]]s and [[Shahid]] [[drone]]s that took out a lot of their [[infrastructure]]. | |
| − | + | "So that part's changing. But also like the ability, I think, of like any kind of [[Great Power]] to go and to conquer another country just with [[Air defense|ballistic missiles and drone defense]]. That's proven that it's almost a [[zero-sum]] game. And [[Russia]], to a certain extent, is running into this in [[Ukraine]]. Now, obviously, we're backing the [[Ukrainian]]s and accelerating that [[war]], and that's dangerous as well. But in terms of the old way that we thought where, like one of the [[Great Power]]s could just go smack around another country and accomplish whatever their objectives were. That has changed. Overall, in terms of more moving towards a [[planet]] that actually has less conflict, that's a good thing. Countries are going to see they really have a limited ability to go in and enforce their will in other countries. We do need to rely on [[diplomacy]] on mutually beneficial [[trade]] and [[commerce]] as opposed to the big country can go smack around the little country." [https://youtu.be/KrDogTjN9eQ?t=1526] | |
| − | + | ===Europe=== | |
| + | *[[Black Mountain Analysis]]: [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/the-geopolitical-trap-structural The Geopolitical Trap: Structural Incentives Prolonging the War in Ukraine [i] ''The war in Ukraine that will not stop...'' | ||
| + | *[[Ian Proud]]: [[AfD]] in [[Germany]] and [[Nigel Farage|Reform UK]] show why [[Europe]]’s [[liberal]] [[government]]s are trapped — continue the [[Ukraine war]] and they lose the [[voter]]s; end it and they lose them anyway. [https://thepeacemonger.substack.com/p/they-cant-stop-the-war-they-cant] | ||
| + | :*[https://youtu.be/mD4W7f9SyMw Europe’s Winter of Starvation, Ukraine Collapse Underway] | [[Stas Krapivnik]] | ||
| + | {{quotebox-float|'''[[Poland]]’s ruling [[liberal]]s plotting major [[escalation]]''' against [[Russia]]. [https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/09/polands-ruling-liberals-appear-to-be-plotting-a-major-escalation-against-russia.html] [[Fico]] warns:''' '[[The West]] wants to provoke [[NATO]]-[[Russia]] [[war]]' '''- [[Lavrov]] warns of devastating response. [https://youtu.be/rks0CcmC2zc] [[Donald Tusk]]: '''[[Ukraine]] losing 27,000 men per month.''' [https://www.military-stuff.org/russia-closes-orekhov-trap-tusk-admits-ukraine-loses-27k-each-month-us-diesel-export-ban-shocks-eu/]}} | ||
| + | It's pretty obvious what this is all about: Now that [[the West]] has fought [[Russia]] "to the last [[Ukrainian]]", it's time to send in the [[German]] & [[Polish]] [[proxies]]. [[NATO]] was banking on a [[Ukraine]] win, although that was never a realistic hope. It did serve to exterminate much of the [[male]] [[Slavic]] [[population]] and advance the cause of weaning us off [[fossil fuels]], however. | ||
| + | *[https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/the-faulty-premises-underlying-europeans The Faulty Premises Underlying Europeans’ 'War on Russia' Hyper-Ventilation]. | ||
| + | :*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/09/amid-eu-war-hysteria-bloc-rearmament-remains-a-joke.html Amid EU War Hysteria, Bloc Rearmament Remains a Joke]. | ||
| + | :*[https://korybko.substack.com/p/european-nato-fears-that-the-us-wont European NATO Fears That The US Won’t Rush To Its Rescue If It Provokes A War With Russia]. | ||
| + | *[[John Helmer]]: Will [[Kaliningrad]] be the spark that ignites a [[nuclear war]]? [https://youtu.be/lqy_fLCfe3w] | ||
| + | *[https://youtu.be/bfmO8LHbm3w Russia Would Win a Nuclear War Against Europe Quickly] | [[Sergei Karaganov]] | ||
| + | *[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/natos-de-facto-expansion-to-the-caspian NATO’s De Facto Expansion To The Caspian Sea Is Inevitable]. | ||
| + | *[[Martin Armstrong]]: [[Forecasting]] [[Europe]]an [[False Flag]] Operations to Start [[War]] with [[Russia]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/martin-armstrong-forecasting-european] | ||
| + | *[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/10/unrest-across-europe-is-the-result-of-the-collapse-of-the-social-contract.html Unrest Across Europe Is the Result of the Collapse of the Social Contract]. | ||
| + | *''[[NYT]]'': [https://archive.is/oy10K It’s Not Just France. Europe’s Political Center Is Crumbling]. | ||
| + | {{quotebox-float|The mass [[riot]]s in [[France]], which started as protests over underfunded [[school]]s, are a shocking example. | ||
| − | + | But the [[phenomenon]] has been building for years, with the perceived failure of [[liberal democracy]] to make good on its promises of a better [[future]], especially for the young and the salaried [[working class]]. | |
| − | + | There is a growing perception among many [[Europe]]ans that [[tradition]]al [[political party|parties]] of the [[center-left]] and [[center-right]] do not offer real alternatives and are led by an [[education|educate]]d [[elitism|elite]] that has lost its connection to the poor, the [[work]]ers and the young. | |
| − | + | Facing rising [[deficit]]s, expenses and [[interest rate]]s, [[government]]s feel constrained in what they can do to respond.}} | |
| + | {{quotebox-float|[[Russia]]n leadership has made it clear that once the remaining 10% of [[Donetsk]] Oblast is cleared, the [[diplomatic]] focus will not center on border adjustments, but on the complete [[demilitarization]] of the [[Ukrainian]] [[state]] and a [[legal]]ly binding revision of the [[Europe]]an [[security architecture]]. Late October 2026 marks the point where operational realities are overtaking [[Western]] [[political]] [[narrative]]s,}} | ||
| − | + | *[https://responsiblestatecraft.org/kaliningrad-nato-russia/ Slouching toward Kaliningrad]. | |
| − | + | *[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-post-war-european-security-architecture The Post-War European Security Architecture Is Beginning To Take Shape]. | |
| − | + | *Off Cape Kaliakra in [[Bulgaria]]’s Exclusive Economic Zone, an [[Israel]]i-owned, [[Liberia]]n-flagged container vessel—the K-Ship Jet—was disabled by three unmanned subsurface vessels (UUVs). The attack confirms that stand-off [[maritime]] interdiction is no longer confined to the [[Persian Gulf]] or [[Red Sea]], but actively targets Israeli-linked [[commercial]] shipping across [[NATO]] waters in the [[Black Sea]]. | |
| − | + | :The operation occurred 20 nautical miles off the coast of a NATO member state, demonstrating that [[Western]] [[naval]] [[alliance]]s cannot guarantee [[maritime]] [[security]] within their own declared economic zones. | |
| − | + | :The deployment of low-cost unmanned submersibles capable of mission-killing large [[commercial]] container ships exposes the obsolescence of [[capital]]-intensive naval planning. While [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] allocates hundreds of billions of dollars toward heavy surface [[combat]]ants and [[nuclear]]-powered destroyers, the operational environment is dominated by autonomous, low-observable [[maritime]] [[drone]]s costing a fraction of a single missile interceptor. | |
| − | + | :With [[Iran]], [[Russia]], and regional resistance axes deploying these capabilities, traditional sea lines of communication are contested across multiple theaters simultaneously. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | *[[Pentagon]] Tells [[Baltic States]] to Tone it Down, Stop Antagonizing [[Russia]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/10/30/pentagon-tells-baltic-states-to-tone-it-down-stop-antagonizing-russia/] | |
| + | *[https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/the-ground-on-which-europe-stands The Ground on which Europe Stands is Shaking]. ''[[European Commission]] proposing 81% increase in annual contributions to [[EU]] budget by member states for next year.'' | ||
| + | :Won't do much to quell [[riot]]s. In fact, they'll only increase, | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ====Ukraine==== | |
| − | *[https:// | + | *[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/putin-always-wanted-a-truly-independent Putin Always Wanted A Truly Independent Ukraine]. |
| − | : | + | *[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/27/russian-airforce-lt-col-killed-in-st-petersburg-car-bomb-attack/ Russian Airforce Lt Col Killed in St Petersburg Car Bomb Terror |