User talk:RobSmith

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, RobSmith, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, RobSmith!


Block

You have been blocked indefinitely.

Blocked: RobSmith and VargasMilan

Reasons for action taken.

Substantial violation of key Conservapedia ethical and moral principles: To wit:

Conservapedia Commandments: number 3.

Conservapedia Guidelines#Duties:

Blocking for ideological reasons
Name Calling and Insults
Using Article Talk pages as Debate Forums for unresolved historical ideological and theological controversies
Unjustified threat of blocking and of massive deletion of all previous contributions (see below)

Conservapedia Guidelines#Civility:

Violation of Civility
Attacking for beliefs

Conservapedia Guidelines#Teamwork

number 2.

Conservapedia Guidelines#90/10 Rule

The sheer bulk of antagonistic responses of opinionated prejudicial point-of-view compared to the verifiable content of substantiated articles wrongly rejected as wrong and biased, refusal to accept reasonable replies with courtesy and respect, and refusal to let the matter rest.

Conservapedia:Topic bans: evidence of promoting a personal agenda as against well-founded research

Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia: numbers 12. and 15.

Bias#Encyclopedias: clear evidence of slanted bias in unjustified activities against multiple Conservapedia users

Trolling: evidence of, in exhibits below

Exhibits follow

A. Unjustified threat of blocking acted on and threat of obtaining a cooperative partner in plan to exercise massive deletion of all previous contributions

User talk:Dataclarifier#Suggestion "enjoy a block" unless a response is forthcoming
Talk:Salvation#Wow threat to get an administrator to "nuke all your contributions from day one"
User talk:Dataclarifier#Unjustified block

C. Talk:Infant baptism#Comment on page

Talk:Infant baptism: general tone of sheer bulk of numerous repetitive arguments and attacks with more of the same in an extensive archive of the page

D. Talk:Helpless babies and sinners: attack on an established doctrinal belief

E. User talk:Dataclarifier#Infant baptism

B. Debate: Infant baptism: repetitive attacks on beliefs and contentious arguing lacking civility

F. User talk:Dataclarifier#Ridiculous arguments

G. User talk:Dataclarifier#See Talk:Salvation

Exhibit A above suggests that RobSmith may have indeed elicited the cooperative agreement of VargasMilan to effect the intended [21 Feb to 1 May] unjustified block removed 25 Feb by AndyS. Further evidence from the comments made by VargasMilan on the linked talk and debate pages of the other exhibits strongly suggests a similar shared hostility and antipathy toward the fundamental key principles of Conservapedia which gradually becomes more evident from the reactions of other users in later postings on both their talk pages.

H. User talk:VargasMilan

I. User talk:RobSmith

Copies to Aschlafly, RobSmith, VargasMilan

--Dataclarifier (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2020 (EDT)

Hi Rob, when are you coming back? --Jpatt 13:54, 5 May 2020 (EDT)

I'm here. I'm trying to get back full time, but it's been one crisis after another since the CCP bioweapon attack. McDonald's isn't even selling hamburgers anymore. I've been helping some of my neighbors hunker down in their bunkers. But I'm monitoring CP and keeping up with the latest developments. RobSLive Free or Die 16:12, 5 May 2020 (EDT)

Can you tell me how to add text next to name

Hi RobS. I notice you have the text "Live Free or Die" next to your name. Can you tell me how to add the same? I want to add "For Christ the King".NishantXavier (talk) 11:58, 10 May 2020 (EDT)

Go to Preferences, New Signature. Use this code. Then hit Save.

[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup>

RobSLive Free or Die 17:30, 10 May 2020 (EDT)

Thanks!NishantXavierFor Christ the King 21:47, 13 May 2020 (EDT)

Remember that Obamagate page on Facebook?

500 new like this week. That page is on fire simply because of the hashtag. Is it okay with you if I make Karajou and TerryH admins on that page? I don't even remember what our goal was with that page. DMorris (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2020 (EDT)

Sure/ I forgot my password. Haven't been there in years. The page was the genesis of CP's Obamagate series. RobSLive Free or Die 23:21, 12 May 2020 (EDT)

Thanks

I took your suggestion about clarifying some of the wording for my recent essay plus I added some great quotes by you. I decided to give it less space on your web page as many people at CP prefer I mention this subject sparingly.Conservative (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2020 (EDT)

it now reads,
  • Ace has yet to restore User: GiuoccoPiano's content that User: GiuoccoPiano added;
whereas
  • Ace has yet to restore the content User: GiuoccoPian added
avoids redundancy. RobSLive Free or Die 04:00, 14 May 2020 (EDT)
I fixed it.
By the way, I added: I thought the Old Testament prophets gave some grave proclamations to people filled with gloom and doom until I saw this! Woe unto you editors! You are "far less welcoming"! Far less welcoming is atheist-speak for you guys are quarrelsome, socially challenged, male atheist. See also: Atheism and social skills and Atheism and women.
Maybe they should have fruit baskets delivered to new editors residences. That might stop their precipitous decline.Conservative (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2020 (EDT)
Ace: I see that you are a new editor. May I have your name and address please?
New editor: Why do you want that?
Ace: To deliver a fruit basket to your residence.
New editor: No thanks. I'm good.
If you could mention the fruit basket idea to Ace, I would appreciate it.Conservative (talk) 06:25, 14 May 2020 (EDT)

When creating a table, is there any way to change font and align text within the table?

Hi Rob, I have another question. When we create a table on Conservapedia, is there any way to align the text to the centre like we do in Excel? Or to change the font of one of the rows, e.g. boldface for the total rows? NishantXavierFor Christ the King 15:53, 15 May 2020 (EDT)

Ewww, I'm not the technical expert who knows those things. For boldening, maybe you can try and experiment with the code here; for font color you'd have to experiment with the code <font color="brown"></font> (brown or whatever color) but I'm not sure where to place it. RobSLive Free or Die 16:07, 15 May 2020 (EDT)
Alright, so I was able to align the text to the center. However, about changing the color of the rows/columns, I'm not sure. For the latter, I think DavidB4 will know more about the technical details. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 16:31, 15 May 2020 (EDT)

Thanks! I figured out how to bold the figures for the total rows. It turned out to be simple enough, just use the bold for the table text as we do normally. It's done. Please check, guys, to see if it's fine. https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Unofficial_2020_presidential_election_predictions Next, we can move on to the projections. Be back soon.NishantXavierFor Christ the King 17:00, 15 May 2020 (EDT)

I saw it, and it looks great! --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 17:06, 15 May 2020 (EDT)

Thanks, Liberal Tears, for your great help, that made it easy. And Rob also.

If fine, we can start compiling available polling for each individual state.

I did it for Alabama: https://www.270towin.com/2020-polls-biden-trump/alabama/

Do either of you have picture rights? I don't. If the pic is fine, can we use it?

We can put the map next to the table. Shall I create a table for 2020 predictions? NishantXavierFor Christ the King 12:17, 16 May 2020 (EDT)

For "picture rights", I think you're referring to upload rights. I unfortunately don't have the "upload" tag, but Rob does. --LiberaltearsJust say no to quid pro joe! | Free Roger Stone! 12:21, 16 May 2020 (EDT)

Awan investigation

Rob, I read somewhere that the police investigation, where they examined devices the Awans used, was closed the day after it opened. Since you followed and wrote about the case, I thought you might find that interesting! Had you heard that yet, or is it something you already know about? VargasMilan (talk) Saturday, 21:50, 16 May 2020 (EDT)

It's complicated and much remains unknown. The usual Deep State suspects are involved - the DNC chair, DOJ prosecutors, and Paul Ryan - the same cohorts in the Obamagate scandal and coverup. What you may be referring to is, that after years of waiting for some prosecutorial action, the day Imran Awan pled guilty to some minor charge, it was revealed the case had been closed months earlier.
All we have right now is some speculation and theory. It appears about 60 Democrat Congresspeople were victims of a scam and blackmail perpetrated by Debbie Wasserman Schultz. But that may be minor compared to what actually did happen, and what Paul Ryan and Debbie Wasserman Schultz covered up. Apparently someone or entity in Pakistan and possibly elsewhere were receiving real-time information from Congressional Committees and offices. Why? Donations? Blackmail? Who knows? Wasserman Schultz most certainly was wittingly involved in this treason; Paul Ryan turned the other cheek, possibly because the DNC had some offsetting blackmail information to use against the RNC. Who knows?
There are two likely trails to follow here: (1) is the information being transmitted to Pakistan. Who, what, when where, why? (2) In a very similar circumstance, which may or may not be related, simultaneously Hillary Clinton's illegal server was transmitting to China real time information from the State Department and the Secretary of State's office.
Because of the similarity in mode, method, timeframe, and personalities involved, and the subsequent coverups, I'd pursue both questions as one investigation. RobSLive Free or Die 22:07, 16 May 2020 (EDT)
IOWs, the setup Imran Awan had in house was very similar to the setup Hillary Clinton had in her house, designed to transmit real time national security information to foreign entities. RobSLive Free or Die 22:19, 16 May 2020 (EDT)
My guess, and I'll take a shot in the dark, is this treasonous activity on the part of the Democrat party from its highest levels and the Obama administration was a sale of national security information in exchange for illegal foreign donations, some of which ended up in the hands of Democrat candidates at all levels, federal and state. Conversely, Paul Ryan and his cohort Reince Prebius may have been involved in something of equal dubiousness, having turned a blind eye and assisted in the coverup. RobSLive Free or Die 22:26, 16 May 2020 (EDT)
Not to go off on a tangent, but let me editorialize some observations:
  • Clinton opponents waited for years for prosecutorial action against Clinton. It never happened.
  • Democrat critics waited for years for prosecutorial action in the Awan case. It never happened.
  • Trump critics waited for years for prosecutorial action in the Mueller probe. It never happened.
  • Obama critics have waited for years for prosecutorial action from John Durham. The precedents aren't encouraging.
In the Clinton case, Hillary Clinton may have received a secret pardon from Obama early on, making the FBI probe moot and window dressing. If true, Obama granting a pardon, and Hillary accepting a pardon for felonious conduct and treason, would have been an issue before Hillary received the DNC nomination and in the general election. This would simply amount to one more count in the Obamagate scandal for misuse of the FBI to conduct a loaded investigation and interfere in 2016 election as cover for a secret pardon to deceive the American people. RobSLive Free or Die 23:15, 16 May 2020 (EDT)

Articles for Deletion

Hi Rob. I have selected the article "Indian Occupied Kashmir" for deletion. The article was created by RepublicanRichard who is parroting the same narrative that Pakistani Military and ISI propagandists push. The sources he uses are all Turkish and Pakistani.Bytemsbu (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2020 (EDT)
Actually, I wasn't aware there was an alleged Indian occupation of Kashmir, but I'm not surprised. Last I heard a few days ago was a military confrontation at the China/Indian border. RobSLive Free or Die 23:30, 24 May 2020 (EDT)
Just to give you background, Pakistan invaded the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in the year 1947. Under the threat of the Pakistani invasion, the Maharaja of the Jammu and Kashmir princely state acceded to India. You can read more about it here [[1]].Bytemsbu (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2020 (EDT)
I made some changes. Why don't you add that to a ==History== section and then more information could be added about the current dispute. RobSLive Free or Die 23:55, 24 May 2020 (EDT)
Right now, the page is an orphan; you just need to watch for other page links to "Indian Occupied Kashmir" and replace it with "the disputed territory of Jammu_and_Kashmir." RobSLive Free or Die 23:58, 24 May 2020 (EDT)
I screwed up - I misspelled the name. Now it needs to be deleted. Can you Merge the contents of Jammu_and_Kashmi at Jammu_and_Kashmir? RobSLive Free or Die 00:13, 25 May 2020 (EDT)
I'll see what I can do.Bytemsbu (talk) 00:16, 25 May 2020 (EDT)
Sorry, I think I'm half awake. I am going to take all the contents from Jammu_and_Kashmi and merge them at Jammu_and_Kashmir, then deleted the misspelled title. Jammu_and_Kashmir then needs to be reorganized. RobSLive Free or Die 00:24, 25 May 2020 (EDT)

Running a Checkuser

I have a suspicion that RepublicanRichard is actually a Pakistani Muslim who works at the University of Houston. I have given more details about this at [[2]]. Can you run a checkuser on his account to see if the IP's are coming from Houston?Bytemsbu (talk) 14:36, 25 May 2020 (EDT)
Simply because somebody may or may not be a Muslim isn't cause to invade their privacy; while the user's creation of a somewhat biased or slanted article may be controversial, it didn't really contain anything that couldn't be fix. Bottomline, he hasn't done anything yet to warrant blocking. But I hope you keep me informed on these contributions cause I just can't be everywhere at once monitoring everything. Thank you. RobSLive Free or Die 14:47, 25 May 2020 (EDT)
I think the fact that he is Muslim is an important detail. I question how this person even found out about this website. Which only leads me to believe that it could be an attempt to purposely infiltrate Conservapedia.Bytemsbu (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2020 (EDT)
Latest news reports show Pakistan supporting Uighur Muslims in the war against Communist China; [3] India is a solid ally, but if Pakistan were to change sides then we'd have something to worry about. RobSLive Free or Die 20:06, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
Pakistan is hand in glove with China. They refuse to condemn China's actions against the Uighurs and in fact will dodge around it when questioned [[4]]. Bytemsbu (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2020 (EDT)

Question

Has there been a confirmation yet whether RepublicanRichard's IP address goes back to Houston?Bytemsbu (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
Also, I believe that the IP of Kamran Riaz's Blog site is 129.7.97.54.Bytemsbu (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
I haven't checked cause he hasn't really violated any site policy. RobSLive Free or Die 15:55, 26 May 2020 (EDT)

Created a New Page

I created a new page about the country East Turkestan which is currently under Chinese occupation. Can I have some help categorizing it? Bytemsbu (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
I added a cat. but it remains an orphan. RobSLive Free or Die 23:06, 26 May 2020 (EDT)

Map of China

Can the Map of China be changed so that Tibet and East Turkestan are shown as separate countries? Bytemsbu (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
What about Outer (or Inner, depending on context) Mongolia? RobSLive Free or Die 16:37, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
I think you are referring to South Mongolia. But yes, that should be shown as separate.Bytemsbu (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
I agree we definitely need a good map showing disputed territories with the indigenous populations; replacing the main map in the China article is probably a long way off. Alternatively, we have a People's Republic of China article where I believe a whole section with subsections on disputed territories should be included. I'd be happy to work with you on that.
Also, find a good map and I'll upload it. RobSLive Free or Die 18:31, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
I found some good antique maps, [[5]], [[6]]. Bytemsbu (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
There here. RobSLive Free or Die 22:20, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
So, am I now able to upload it to the article on China?Bytemsbu (talk) 22:21, 27 May 2020 (EDT)
Why don't you start with the PRC article and we can develop some good narrative text, then integrate things into History of China and eventually the full China article. RobSLive Free or Die 22:30, 27 May 2020 (EDT)

Hi there

Hey rob I need something to work on. Ty BorisKhlivski (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2020 (EDT)

How about Trump administration and the CCP with this as your primary source. RobSLive Free or Die 22:28, 27 May 2020 (EDT)