Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flipperpithecus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
There aren't too many hits even on this. Are there any sources more recent than 1983? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:30, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 
There aren't too many hits even on this. Are there any sources more recent than 1983? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:30, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 
::It was misspelled before.  I fixed it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:31, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 
::It was misspelled before.  I fixed it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:31, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::I think that the 1983 material is sufficient.  I don't think the evolutionists want to write about this now since it was an embarrassment.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:33, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:33, August 15, 2007

Obviously it's not my call, but I actually thought this article was vandalism until I saw who worked on it. The *only* google hits on this word are on this article. Are you sure you haven't been had on this? Aziraphale 15:46, 23 July 2007 (EDT) <-king of the sea...

There aren't too many hits even on this. Are there any sources more recent than 1983? DanH 19:30, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

It was misspelled before. I fixed it. Conservative 19:31, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
I think that the 1983 material is sufficient. I don't think the evolutionists want to write about this now since it was an embarrassment. Conservative 19:33, 15 August 2007 (EDT)