Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roy and Silo"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(reply)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
::Ok, please give me a few minutes. I will try to address the issue. --[[User:NicholasM|NicholasM]] 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
::Ok, please give me a few minutes. I will try to address the issue. --[[User:NicholasM|NicholasM]] 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Isn't point two exactly opposite of the entire article...? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Isn't point two exactly opposite of the entire article...? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
Several here are either clueless about the very promiscuous homosexual lifestyle, or are aware of it and seek to mislead others.  We're going to remain factual here and will not post deceptive information for the [[gay agenda]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 18:10, November 25, 2008

The notion that homosexuality is seen in the wild may be contrasted with the apparently homosexual behavior of some animals in captivity. This must be distinguished from the argument that whatever animals do is "natural" and therefore normal for human beings.

Please rewrite the article to reflect this. --Ed Poor Talk 12:32, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Personally, I think this is an unnecessary article. -DrSandstone 12:33, 25 November 2008 (EST)
I am agree that apparent homosexual behavior in animal is used as an excuse to justify homosexuality in humans, This need to be mentioned. --NicholasM 12:41, 25 November 2008 (EST)

This highly misleading entry is going to be deleted unless it is completely changed to emphasize and reflect:

  • the politicization of this issue
  • the absence in the animal kingdom of any display of the homosexual lifestyle
  • the rarity of even homosexual acts among animals

--Aschlafly 12:52, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Homosexual and lesbian acts are frequent among bonobos. I think scientists can reasonably claim that bonobos have a bisexual lifestyle. StanleyJ 13:06, 25 November 2008 (EST)
Ok, please give me a few minutes. I will try to address the issue. --NicholasM 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)
Isn't point two exactly opposite of the entire article...? HDCase 12:54, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Several here are either clueless about the very promiscuous homosexual lifestyle, or are aware of it and seek to mislead others. We're going to remain factual here and will not post deceptive information for the gay agenda.--Aschlafly 13:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)