Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Censorship"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
::No, it was [[User:Conservative|Conservative]].  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::No, it was [[User:Conservative|Conservative]].  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
:::Oh, my bad. Well, I don't know, it just might become a sysop war (if it hasn't already) I would adive to just stay out of it.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:59, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
+
:::Oh, my bad. Well, I don't know, it just might become a sysop war (if it hasn't already) I would advise to just stay out of it.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:59, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:59, 1 May 2008

I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like this quote regarding the Evolution article is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action?

"the article is protected to keep it a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article as the website leadership wants it to be a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article"

I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia', no? EngelUmpocker 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--ITSAMEMARIO 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
No, it was Conservative. EngelUmpocker 18:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
Oh, my bad. Well, I don't know, it just might become a sysop war (if it hasn't already) I would advise to just stay out of it.--ITSAMEMARIO 18:59, 1 May 2008 (EDT)