Difference between revisions of "User talk:AngusT"
(→Argumentum Ad Hominem) |
(→"liberal") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Please avoid name calling, as you did at [[Talk:Main Page]]. If you are not aware of the rules, please take a look at them again. Calling brits "whiney", and insulting them is against the rules. Thank you. | Please avoid name calling, as you did at [[Talk:Main Page]]. If you are not aware of the rules, please take a look at them again. Calling brits "whiney", and insulting them is against the rules. Thank you. | ||
{{warning}} | {{warning}} | ||
| + | [[User:JonM|JonM]] 12:20, 14 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "liberal" == | ||
| + | |||
| + | After browsing some of your contributions, I have found your edits to be less than satisfactory. Attaching the accusation of "liberal" to completely non-partisan articles was a favored tactic of parodists, so I have my reservations about your edits. Consider yourself warned. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 19:58, 17 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | :I don't know what you're talking about, but I would ask you not to post accusations or "warnings" on my talk again. Or anything, for that matter. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 20:04, 17 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Back away from AngusT. He's a valuable contributor and whatever blocks you will inflict on him will be revoked by me. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 20:06, 17 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:06, June 18, 2013
Welcome!
Hello, AngusT, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, AngusT!
- JacobB 00:48, 14 December 2009 (EST)
AngusT, remember that the Conservapedia Commandments forbid excessive talk. Repeatedly arguing on talk pages is a blockable offense under the 90/10 Rule. Please be sure you make substantive contributions as well as discussions. Thank you.--Wuhao1911 19:46, 3 January 2010 (EST)
Editing
Please be sure you give citations and explain removal of already vetted facts. If you remove a citation, please replace it with another. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:33, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- I removed a broken link and the "facts" it supported. The site in question, even if the link worked, as for an obviously socialist group called the United States Institute for Peace. I don't think this is a reliable source by Conservapdia standards, but I could be wrong. The article as it stands basically accuses Pinochet of murdering thousands of innocent people, something communist apologetic liberals like to say but which has never been proved. The Pinochet article gives a much more accurate account than the Allende one, so it seems that one should to be edited for accuracy. In my opinion, Conservapedia shouldn't jump on the anti-Pinochet bandwagon like so many leftists in this country. I welcome your input in this area. AngusT 16:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
Lindbergh
Hi. Thanks for pointing this out about "Lucky Lindy". --Ed Poor Talk 14:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
- You're welcome. I'm a little surprised he wasn't mentioned already! AngusT 10:08, 16 September 2010 (EDT)
Argumentum Ad Hominem
Please avoid name calling, as you did at Talk:Main Page. If you are not aware of the rules, please take a look at them again. Calling brits "whiney", and insulting them is against the rules. Thank you. Template:Warning JonM 12:20, 14 February 2012 (EST)
"liberal"
After browsing some of your contributions, I have found your edits to be less than satisfactory. Attaching the accusation of "liberal" to completely non-partisan articles was a favored tactic of parodists, so I have my reservations about your edits. Consider yourself warned. brenden 19:58, 17 June 2013 (EDT)
- I don't know what you're talking about, but I would ask you not to post accusations or "warnings" on my talk again. Or anything, for that matter. AngusT 20:04, 17 June 2013 (EDT)
- Back away from AngusT. He's a valuable contributor and whatever blocks you will inflict on him will be revoked by me. - Markman 20:06, 17 June 2013 (EDT)
