Essay:Man is not the descendant of monkey

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Man is not the descendant of monkey is a true statement that liberal academia refuses to adhere to. They falsely prefer to interpret man through an evolution stage, beast to man. In addition, they wrongly assert biology as proof of 'Mankind from beast' nonsense. They cling to the dishonest notions developed by Charles Darwin.

The Bible has great insight into who Man really is.

Genesis KJV Bible

Man is of God, not of beast.

  • So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Genesis 1:27 (God did not create monkey in his image)
  • And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul. Genesis 2:7 (There was nothingness and then God made Man from dust, not from beast)
  • And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Genesis 2:19 (God formed every beast...and monkey.)
  • And the man gave names to all cattle, and to the birds of the heavens, and to every beast of the field; but for man there was not found a help meet for him. Genesis 2:20 (Man named every beast- including 'Monkey'. No other previous historical connection existed)
  • By the sweat of your face You will eat bread, Till you return to the ground, Because from it you were taken; For you are dust, And to dust you shall return. Genesis 3:19 (Man's biological roots are dust, not ape, chimp, nor gorilla)