From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Click here to post a new message

Please read this

The editor using the User:Liberaltears account will be checking this message area. You can leave a message in the message area below.

If you want to provide feedback concerning content created using the User: Liberaltears account at Conservapedia, please use the talk pages of the respective articles.

If you need assistance sooner, there is a list of Conservapedia administrators HERE


I sent an upload request to your email as an attachment cause I had to create it myself. Thanks. RobSFree Kyle! 22:11, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Done; see here. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 22:21, 19 February 2021 (EST)

About Royal/King Templates

It would make those articles make sense, instead of using a Infobox Person template. --Yeschayi ~ Talk (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Yeah, fair point. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 23:58, 19 February 2021 (EST)

Timely article

Here's a timely article on an historical subject there evidently is a lot of interest in right now. [1] RobSFree Kyle! 03:16, 1 March 2021 (EST)


Do you have Move rights? RobSFree Kyle! 23:13, 16 March 2021 (EDT)

Unfortunately, no. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Wednesday, 23:23, 16 March 2021 (EDT)
This is what I mean by no collaboration, cooperation, or communication between users. You make a simple typo like this on an important article, a week later nobody cares, and you can't talk to anyone for fear of being accused of being a RW infiltrator or Nazi spy. RobSFree Kyle! 00:30, 17 March 2021 (EDT)

Thanks for your great work LT!

Thank you for all your great work promoting Conservapedia and the Conservative Cause, and the Gospel, LT! I've been away, as you know, and have returned mainly thanks to you! Thanks for following up and keeping me involved. God bless all your good efforts and richly reward you for it.

In Christ, Nishant X. NishantXavierFor Christ the King 00:11, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

You're welcome, and it's a great honor to have you back! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Monday, 00:15, 22 March 2021 (EDT)

Hi again Liberal Tears. Please see, if you have time, if you can improve this article:

Thanks and God Bless, Nishant Xavier. NishantXavierFor Christ the King 04:39, 26 March 2021 (EDT)

Whoops, sorry for not responding to this sooner. Right now I'm working on some other projects outside of CP, and I'll try to get to that article/debate if I can sometime soon. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Wednesday, 11:50, 31 March 2021 (EDT)


First, you don't ever speak for me, nor do you apologize for me. Second, you don't reverse my blocks because it makes you feel good. Apparently, you ignored this individual's own history in this site, in Wikipedia, and in other sites where he decided on his own accord to try to force his own personal viewpoint on various subjects, which included the identification and calling out of an edit war by you in the Santa Claus article. His own viewpoint on Conservapedia as a whole is in this page[2], where he condemns us for believing God created the earth in a week. No, we do not this this guy back at all; he can take his viewpoint somewhere else. Karajou (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

It's not a big deal. The search engines like original content. If he were to write original content at Conservapedia and then give it some time and then later copy it to Wikipedia that would be better. This way, Conservapedia would get the credit for it to be original content. Conservapedia states in its commandments or guidelines that we don't want people copying content at Wikipedia and posting it at Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
In other words, we are better off without that editor if he was going to do nothing but copy his Wikpedia content to Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
That type of lousy attitude is why our Alexa ranking has fallen so much. Furthermore, editors here are allowed to bring over content they write on WP. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 16:34, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
The lousy attitude is yours. He was blocked for edit wars, and you have the nerve to change it to my own attitude, and a disallowing by me for his WP articles? You need to change your way of thinking. Karajou (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
All I was saying is that it could have been worse. It doesn't appear to be a tragedy.Conservative (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
Well Karajou, speaking of me needing to change my mind, at least now you're maybe half recognizing that the role of an admin is to convince and persuade others than to outright use the banhammer. I'll hand that to you. Thank you for changing your way of thinking! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 15:35, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

I spoke to RobS today

I spoke to RobS today. We improved the 90/10 rule at Conservapedia and Andy approved the improvement to the rule. Conservative (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2021 (EDT)

Awesome! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 14:59, 9 May 2021 (EDT)
Please see: Conservapedia:90/10 rule
I realized I said I would be talking to RobS much later, but I changed my mind about this. Conservative (talk) 14:58, 9 May 2021 (EDT)