View source for Michael Bromwich

===Lawyer conduct===
During testimony, the Committee learned [[Dr. Christine Blasey Ford]]'s attorneys had withheld from her the fact that Committee staff investigators were willing to travel to [[California]] to obtain sworn testimony and maintain confidential information.<ref>https://youtu.be/wPouKN05IDo</ref> By not informing their client, the attorneys forced a public hearing of her allegations against her wishes.

Her lawyers also claimed to have the results of a polygraph examination in the form of audio, video and charts attesting to the veracity of her allegations which they refused to share with the Committee. Chairman [[Chuck Grassley]] demanded material evidence relevant to allegations  the attorneys claimed to have had against [[Judge Brett Kavanaugh]].<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/389991842/Letter-to-Ford-attorneys#from_embed</ref><ref>http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/02/grassley-ford-boyfriend-polygraph/</ref>  

The Judiciary Committee issued a statement suggesting that Blasey Ford's legal team may have violated the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct by apparently withholding key information from their client.<ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/36684/senate-judiciary-committee-statement-suggests-james-barrett</ref> Blasey Ford's attorneys may face sanctions by the DC Bar Association.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>

On October 30, 2018 Judicial Watch filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of [[Debra S. Katz]], Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Blasey Ford before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Kavanaugh nomination hearings.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-bar-complaint-against-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>