View source for OfficeMax v. Levesque

In ''OfficeMax v. Levesque'', the [[First Circuit]] held that:
{{cquote|Contract interpretation, when based on contractual language without resort to extrinsic evidence, is a ‘question of law’ that is reviewed de novo.}} 
658 F.3d 94, 97 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing ''Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Racal-Datacom, Inc.'', 233 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2000)). 
[[category:breach of contract]]
[[category:First Circuit]]