View source for Talk:Grandiose narcissism

:Look, it's too easy to make a [[retard]]ed kid look or feel like an [[idiot]]. That's not necessarily [[narcissism]], despite whatever your mother taught you. 15:47, June 23, 2025 (EDT)

'''Question:''' Is this a [[narcissistic]] statement: "Three websites appeared in the public eye '''due to [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:User_complaints&diff=prev&oldid=2120851 my skill of being able to drive people crazy]''' by fully engaging their emotions, logical mind and conscience," or a confession to being a [[psychotic]] [[troll]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:01, June 23, 2025 (EDT)

Mark: I watched about 20 seconds of the first video in your playlist. Your "expert" doesn't even know how to spell "gradiosity". Why don't you challenge her to an [[IQ]] test? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:38, June 23, 2025 (EDT)

[[File:Grandiose narcissism.PNG|center|650px|thumb|Another Mark Miller "expert" can't even spell whatever she's supposedly holds expertise in on the [[Conservapedia]] educational resource webserver.]]

:'''Question:''' Did the doctor commit the spelling error or was it a video editor on her team?

:""Style over substance" is a logical fallacy where someone prioritizes the presentation or delivery of an argument over its actual content or logical reasoning. It occurs when the way something is said or presented is considered more important than whether the claims are actually true or well-supported."[https://www.google.com/search?q=style+over+substance+logical+argument&oq=style+over+substance+logical+argument&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQLhhA0gEJMTU2ODVqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8]

:Please endeavor to put forth factual and logical arguments. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:23, July 20, 2025 (EDT)
::What makes you think she's got a team? Looks like she can't even afford an office. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:33, July 20, 2025 (EDT)
:::I didn't claim she has a team. I just threw out the question. Furthermore, the style over substance fallacy you committed shows how poor and illogical your "argument" was. Conservative (talk) 16:37, July 20, 2025 (EDT)
::::bla bla bla you're not going to spam your way out of this mess.

::::Only a [[narcissist]] brags about his [[IQ]]. [https://sites.google.com/view/intellectual-dual-challenge/home] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:05, July 21, 2025 (EDT)
:::::If a person has called multiple Conservapedia editors dumb, it is certainly legitimate to challenge him to a IQ test challenge. Doing so moves things from mere subjective opinion to something based on facts/data. Facts/data are generally far more valuable that one person's subjective opinion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:30, July 21, 2025 (EDT)
::::::I calls em as I sees em. It's called being honest and [[transparent]], especially when an editor is warned about [[spamming]].

::::::I would rather call an [[idiot]] like yourself a "dummy" after you are warned about abusive editing practices than to bring down the banhammer without warning like Karajou is/was in the habit of. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 14:40, July 21, 2025 (EDT)

::::::[[User:Conservative]]: Get over yourself [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/workspace&diff=next&oldid=2118761]