Page history
September 5, 2025
April 9, 2019
September 26, 2018
April 27, 2018
Sources.
+321
Reverted edits by Kingdamian1 (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot
m+408
no edit summary
-408
August 30, 2016
June 23, 2016
July 27, 2014
May 22, 2014
no edit summary
+1
no edit summary
+50
no edit summary
+37
no edit summary
+3
no edit summary
-1
no edit summary
+24
no edit summary
no edit summary
+17
no edit summary
-21
no edit summary
+362
no edit summary
no edit summary
+10
no edit summary
+13
no edit summary
+18
no edit summary
+1
no edit summary
+32
no edit summary
-276
no edit summary
+27
no edit summary
+200
no edit summary
-1
no edit summary
+2,218
August 6, 2013
September 5, 2012
November 7, 2011
February 11, 2009
December 1, 2008
October 27, 2008
October 25, 2008
October 24, 2008
September 18, 2008
Improve footnote. There's nothing "unreliable" about the source, unless you are bigoted against creationism.
+118
Significant is a weasel word. Cleaned up biased language, reference is not a reliable source and should be considered for replacement.
Remove addition: "significant" is a weasel word, and whether this change really constitutes evolution is yet to be determined.
-300
whoops
m-11
reference is better served as an external link
m+43
contradicting slow changes is irrelevant, and no claim is being made that the changes in themselves are complete macroevolution
-249
September 17, 2008
July 5, 2008
Revert again for reasons explained on talk page.
-2,772
Revert; previous version was opinion based/factually incorrect; added sources
+2,772
Revert; opinions presented as fact and incorrect claims made.
-633