Page history
December 28, 2025
April 13, 2024
October 2, 2020
April 9, 2019
September 26, 2018
July 13, 2016
July 1, 2016
April 29, 2015
April 4, 2015
May 20, 2013
not of science working as intended, since the fraud was easily detectable immediately if scientific methods had been used by evolutionists
+109
correcting a refuted hypothesis and condeming results that cannot be duplicated is a central principle of science
+34
May 19, 2013
October 15, 2011
September 28, 2011
September 21, 2011
August 22, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 8, 2011
June 30, 2010
January 31, 2010
Rather than admit the defects in their methods that facilitate hoaxes, many evolutionists simply rewrote their alleged tree of ancestors without the Piltdown man in it.
-24
The refusal of evolutionists to adhere to the scientific method and allow independent scrutiny of their claims enabled this fraud to persist for over forty years.
+155
→Questions begin
m+53
→History
madded some detail
+2,668
January 30, 2010
October 7, 2009
February 15, 2009
January 15, 2009
January 4, 2009
December 27, 2008
September 29, 2007
September 20, 2007
Removing category where there is already a subcategory, see talk
-21
Since we're asking questions: Why the silent revert?
-78
Wasn't this a hoax? Why remove the category tag?
+99
Tagging with (fact)
-78
Category
-21
hoax
+12
what it was, then "fraud"
-1
no edit summary
m+20
September 17, 2007
September 12, 2007
May 4, 2007
Speculation for fabrication, fabrication implies bad faith (which is not supported by the source)
m-1
Source shows him making a tool, not tools and no tiger wife or child. Fixed sentence to reflect source cited.
-54